Author Topic: A dose of Reality for Team Nasser (Read 4720 times)

theworm · « **Reply #25 on:** February 17, 2009, 06:32:08 PM »

i am going with Hukster on this one...

ronnie is probably the best BB to ever have lived

nasser will be completely forgotten in a few years...if not already forgotton, other than these useless threads at getbig.

disturbia · « **Reply #26 on:** February 17, 2009, 06:48:04 PM »

the main thing I dont get about these Nasser lovers is,...he has no Olympia titles. Not even one. And Ronnie has what,..8? Isnt that kind of like,..end argument right there?

calfzilla · « **Reply #27 on:** February 17, 2009, 06:49:09 PM »

Quote from: disturbia on February 17, 2009, 06:48:04 PM

the main thing I dont get about these Nasser lovers is,...he has no Olympia titles. Not even one. And Ronnie has what,..8? Isnt that kind of like,..end argument right there?

Exactly. And Gunter has even beaten the great Ronnie. Has Nassoil ever beaten either one of them?

Sharma · « **Reply #28 on:** February 17, 2009, 07:26:02 PM »

Quote from: disturbia on February 17, 2009, 06:48:04 PM

the main thing I dont get about these Nasser lovers is,...he has no Olympia titles. Not even one. And Ronnie has what,..8? Isnt that kind of like,..end argument right there?

No, not at all. You miss many points.

Ronnie was lucky to win a few of his Olympias - he did not deserve them.

Nasser did deserve 2/3 Olympias at least so the actual number they should have won is much closer.

Nasser compete in the greatest ever era - against peak levrone, Ray, Wheeler and the Yates creature.

Ronnie compete at a much easier time against mediocre and over the hill athletes.

Ronnie is an American and that already gives you a headstart at the Olympia.

The sport is finally rejecting mass at unacceptable levels of condition and aesthetic flow. This why Dex is the champ now. Nasser had better aesthetics than ANY mass monster in history. If he compete now, he win the Olympia against anybody because he has the greatest combination of mass and aesthetics ever seen.

So the fact he don't have the trophies in a corrupt and fixed crooked fraud is immaterial. In fact, the sheer injustice of it all is exactly why i support the guy.

the_swami · « **Reply #29 on:** February 17, 2009, 07:27:46 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 17, 2009, 07:26:02 PM

No, not at all. You miss many points.

Ronnie was lucky to win a few of his Olympias - he did not deserve them.

Nasser did deserve 2/3 Olympias at least so the actual number they should have won is much closer.

Nasser compete in the greatest ever era - against peak levrone, Ray, Wheeler and the Yates creature.

Ronnie compete at a much easier time against mediocre and over the hill athletes.

Ronnie is an American and that already gives you a headstart at the Olympia.

The sport is finally rejecting mass at unacceptable levels of condition and aesthetic flow. This why Dex is the champ now. Nasser had better aesthetics than ANY mass monster in history. If he compete now, he win the Olympia against anybody.

So the fact he don't have the trophies in a corrupt and fixed crooked fraud is immaterial. In fact, the sheer injustice of it all is exactly why i support the guy.

ANOTHER BRILLIANT TRUTHFUL POST from one of getbig's finest

Sharma · « **Reply #30 on:** February 17, 2009, 07:29:39 PM »

Quote from: the_swami on February 17, 2009, 07:27:46 PM

ANOTHER BRILLIANT TRUTHFUL POST from one of getbig's finest

Thankyou bro.

the_swami · « **Reply #31 on:** February 17, 2009, 07:56:15 PM »

you are most welcome sharma

theworm · « **Reply #32 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:20:01 PM »

you are saying Nasser is was a better BB than ronnie?

i agree with the above: Ronnie 8, Nasser 0

you can;t bullshit your way out of those facts, ever.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #33 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:28:38 PM »

Naszero couldn't win a camel beauty pagent looking like he did at the last shows he limped through.

superthick · « **Reply #34 on:** February 18, 2009, 01:54:57 PM »

nasser = oil bag loser who never won the O

Ruffneck · « **Reply #35 on:** February 18, 2009, 02:12:02 PM »

Quote from: theworm on February 18, 2009, 01:20:01 PM

you are saying Nasser is was a better BB than ronnie?

i agree with the above: Ronnie 8, Nasser 0

you can;t bullshit your way out of those facts, ever.

X2.

I think a majority actually think Nasser was a very good bodybuilder, just not the legendary one you claim nor should be held in the same light as esteemed legends such as Ronnie and Dorian.

Good - without a shadow of a doubt

Great - No fucking chance im afraid.

delta9mda · « **Reply #36 on:** February 18, 2009, 02:26:52 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 17, 2009, 03:45:23 PM

nasser is soft and oily in every pic compared to ronnie.

every one:

im a Yates fan and you know this hulky, but your boy Ronnie is KILLING Nasser.

Hulkster · « **Reply #37 on:** February 18, 2009, 06:49:38 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on February 18, 2009, 02:26:52 PM

im a Yates fan and you know this hulky, but your boy Ronnie is KILLING Nasser.

absolutely.

Ronnie crushes Nassoil.

Tyr · « **Reply #38 on:** February 18, 2009, 10:16:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2009, 06:49:38 PM

absolutely.

Ronnie crushes Nassoil.

Haha

Its quite telling that NONE of the multiple Olympia winners ever had to offer worn clothing on their websites.

BatistaSL · « **Reply #39 on:** February 18, 2009, 10:24:16 PM »

Ronnie Is great;
Nassar is Good;
Team Nassar is GAY!!

wes · « **Reply #40 on:** February 18, 2009, 10:29:26 PM »

...

Sharma · « **Reply #41 on:** February 19, 2009, 09:49:59 AM »

A dose of gyno for team hulkster

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #42 on:** February 19, 2009, 09:51:22 AM »

Posing trunks worn by a Mr Olympia is worth 100X the amount of one worn by naszero.

bigbobs · « **Reply #43 on:** February 19, 2009, 10:01:15 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2009, 06:49:38 PM

absolutely.

Ronnie crushes Nassoil.

Brutal posting a pic of Nasser before he's even fully-flexed! Like I questioned before, why don't you simply use comparisons where they are both ON THE SAME STAGE AT THE SAME TIME and near or at their all-time best, i.e. the 98 Olympia? That would be the unbiased thing to do as opposed to finding pictures from different shows with different lighting. Oh yeah, because your arguments won't fly anymore

BuffD · « **Reply #44 on:** February 19, 2009, 04:50:17 PM »

It's funny that you are arguing that Nasser should have won 2 or 3 Mr O's and he finished 2nd in the Mr O what maybe once?

You think he should have won in 98 and he took 3rd. Get over it. He wasn't good enough to win plain and simple.

the_swami · « **Reply #45 on:** February 19, 2009, 04:56:58 PM »

Quote from: the_swami on February 17, 2009, 05:27:31 PM

Hulkster
are you friends with Ronnie?

i think both Ronnie and Nasser are all time greats of BB. also if you watch Nasser on the Way Part 4 , you can see both guys have a great deal of respect for each other and whats done on the battefield is part of competition.

but when it comes to rapport, friendliness, and the ability to converse with fans- Nasser easily outshines Ronnie.

Ronnie just comes across as aloof and stand-offish- i dont know whether its his southern drawl, his personality being a bit introverted or whether he really could give a shit but ive tried to converse with ROnnie and it seemed it was really hard for him to string more than few sentences together.

Conversely, Nasser is down to earth, friendly, has a great dry sense of humor, is very well spoken and can converse on ANY topic!

Hulkster · « **Reply #46 on:** February 19, 2009, 05:34:27 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on February 19, 2009, 10:01:15 AM

Brutal posting a pic of Nasser before he's even fully-flexed! Like I questioned before, why don't you simply use comparisons where they are both ON THE SAME STAGE AT THE SAME TIME and near or at their all-time best, i.e. the 98 Olympia? That would be the unbiased thing to do as opposed to finding pictures from different shows with different lighting. Oh yeah, because your arguments won't fly anymore

uh. this has been done a million times and Nasser gets crushed every time.

I like to give nasser a chance though - thats why I pick pics of him when he was in better shape - eg. 95/96/97.

98 he was already going downhill..

problem is, even in 95/95/97, Ronnie still CRUSHES nasser...

IceCold · « **Reply #47 on:** February 19, 2009, 06:07:31 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 17, 2009, 03:45:23 PM

nasser is soft and oily in every pic compared to ronnie.

every one:

that "oily" pic of nasser was taken before synthol even existed.

try again.

Hulkster · « **Reply #48 on:** February 19, 2009, 06:21:33 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on February 19, 2009, 06:07:31 PM

that "oily" pic of nasser was taken before synthol even existed.

try again.

thats even worse then.

it means that the quality of Nasser's muscle was even worse than previously thought.

its easy to blame his mediocrity on oil, but now, we can see that didn't need the oil to be mediocre.

thanks icecold.

keep up the great work.

Sharma · « **Reply #49 on:** February 19, 2009, 06:45:52 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on February 19, 2009, 06:07:31 PM

that "oily" pic of nasser was taken before synthol even existed.

try again.

hulkster doesn't worry about facts. all he cares about is his opinion and sexual desire of ronnie coleman - a guy who has never rang him, talked to him , or even given him the time of day.