How do you know? Are you aN expert on genes?
Larry Scott was a great bber for sure, but to compare him to a 90's era bber is stupid.
I
Whats stupid is having 16000 posts and challenging something that is so obvious to anyone with any REAL bodybuilding knowledge, Structurally they are light years apart, Scott has no real weaknesses, Nasser has no genetics for back, even with a great mind for modern day bodybuilding and the drugs of the modern era, he couldnt overcome this huge weakness, as he had in other weaknesses such as his delts arms and calves, even you must realise that if they werent weak points he wouldnt have needed to shoot the shit out of them so that he actually had more scar tissue than muscle in the end.
Nasser was a great modern day bodybuilder, and in the modern age he overcame a shortfall on his genetic structure, by being more massive, in an age where mass was overly rewarded in my opinion. He got close to the top of the sport and would have won an olympia if he had a better back, every front and side pose of the man is top 6 at the olympia, but when he turned around he wasnt even top 10 and this is what hurt his placings not politics.