Author Topic: 1998 Mr. O DVD PICS - Ronnie, Flex & Nasser (Read 12110 times)

bigbobs · « **Reply #50 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:31:32 PM »

Thanks for the pics but it doesn't really say much unless they are together on stage at the same time. The pics presented are each from different distances and it it's hard to tell how they look next to each other.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #51 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:31:35 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:30:08 PM

98 ronnie fears 99 ronnie

Hulkster · « **Reply #52 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:31:40 PM »

damn ronnie had smooth quads in 98 compared to 99.

probably because his conditioning was better in 99...

Hulkster · « **Reply #53 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:37:13 PM »

Quote from: FreedomFighter on February 21, 2009, 03:51:05 PM

i think Ron is the best Mr.O ever but it wasn't his best 98-
look at 99- he was killer

exactly. but ND clings to a quote from peter mcgough that says ronnie was harder in 98, which is clearly wrong and everything shows this, but he clings to the quote anyway because he is an idiot and can't think for himself...he spends his life looking to other people for his opinions. he can't malke up his own.

99>>>98:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #54 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:37:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:31:40 PM

damn ronnie had smooth quads in 98 compared to 99.

probably because his conditioning was better in 99...

Ronnie what was your best Olympia and why?

Ronnie Coleman : I would have to say my first , because my conditioning was spot-on. "

Hulkster · « **Reply #55 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:38:13 PM »

damn. ronnie's quad cuts are so much deeper in 99, its clear in every pic.

must be that inferior conditioning LOL

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #56 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:39:57 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:37:13 PM

exactly. but ND clings to a quote from peter mcgough that says ronnie was harder in 98, which is clearly wrong and everything shows this, but he clings to the quote anyway because he is an idiot and can't think for himself...he spends his life looking to other people for his opinions. he can't malke up his own.

99>>>98:

See above and FYI both of these people were there live & in person and BOTH come to the same conclusion

if assuming what you do say is true 1999 Mr Olympia would be considered to be his best ever showing and NOT the much lighter & harder 2001 Arnold Classic

once again you can't back up your claims I can and did

Hulkster · « **Reply #57 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:40:43 PM »

isn't it funny how quotes don't match up to real life, eh ND?:

99>>>98 as always..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #58 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:43:02 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:38:13 PM

damn. ronnie's quad cuts are so much deeper in 99, its clear in every pic.

must be that inferior conditioning LOL

You keep typing this and pics show his quads were just as cut and hard in 98 than 99 albeit a tad smaller which explains why they mention his quads are BIGGER not better

review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page 90:

257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98. In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer presen

opppsssss sorry to own you yet again

Hulkster · « **Reply #59 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:44:14 PM »

Quote

if assuming what you do say is true 1999 Mr Olympia would be considered to be his best ever showing and NOT the much lighter & harder 2001 Arnold Classic

just because 99 is better than 98 does not mean that the 2001 AC is not better than both of them in the eyes of many.

how you came to the conclusion that if 99 is better than 98 that it must be better than the 2001 AC also is stupid.

ps McGough feels 99>98 but that the 2001 AC is better than both.

see for yourself:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614

so saying that since 99 is not considered his best that it must not be as good as 98 is completely stupid.

you truly have no sense of logic do you?

oh thats right. I keep teaching you philosophy on this board just like I teach you bodybuilding..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #60 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:44:28 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:40:43 PM

isn't it funny how quotes don't match up to real life, eh ND?:

99>>>98 as always..

since when is your pics ' real life ' ? where you at this contest? NO was Ronnie? YES was Peter McGough? YES thanks for playing real life

and stopping running from the question why is 1999 NOT considered his best showing ever? we're all waiting

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #61 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:46:52 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:44:14 PM

just because 99 is better than 98 does not mean that the 2001 AC is better than both of them in the eyes of many.

how you came to the conclusion that if 99 is better than 98 that it must be better than the 2001 AC also is stupid.

ps McGough feels 99>98 but that the 2001 AC is better than both.

see for yourself:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614

He doesn't say ANYWHERE that he was better conditioned in 1999 see FAIL what does he say about his conditioning in 1999 compared to 1998? yeah I thought so thanks for playing

Hulkster · « **Reply #62 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:47:10 PM »

Quote

and stopping running from the question why is 1999 NOT considered his best showing ever?

it is by many. look a few posts above you moron.

just not by Peter McGough.

there is more to bodybuilding than Peter McGough.

Hulkster · « **Reply #63 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:48:02 PM »

Quote

He doesn't say ANYWHERE that he was better conditioned in 1999 see FAIL

see ND backpeddling as always..

I caught him and owned him like I always do.

now he has to change his original story.

nice try..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #64 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:49:32 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:44:14 PM

just because 99 is better than 98 does not mean that the 2001 AC is not better than both of them in the eyes of many.

how you came to the conclusion that if 99 is better than 98 that it must be better than the 2001 AC also is stupid.

ps McGough feels 99>98 but that the 2001 AC is better than both.

see for yourself:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614

so saying that since 99 is not considered his best that it must not be as good as 98 is completely stupid.

you truly have no sense of logic do you?

oh thats right. I keep teaching you philosophy on this board just like I teach you bodybuilding..

Where is 1999? yeah I thought so , thanks for playing

Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004

As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #65 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:50:44 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:47:10 PM

it is by many. look a few posts above you moron.

just not by Peter McGough.

there is more to bodybuilding than Peter McGough.

See above moron and where are all the 1999 is Ronnie's best showing quotes? thanks for playing moron

jtsunami · « **Reply #66 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:51:31 PM »

Quote from: tendonitis on February 21, 2009, 11:52:27 AM

Ronnie is the clear winner.

in what the who has the largest GYNO competition? That should automatically disqualify him there.

Hulkster · « **Reply #67 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:52:08 PM »

ND, you truly are a master at saying one thing, being proven wrong and then changing your original story...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #68 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:52:21 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:48:02 PM

see ND backpeddling as always..

I caught him and owned him like I always do.

now he has to change his original story.

nice try..

Where does it say he was better conditioned? WHERE? it doesn't in fact quite the opposite he says he's not as hard and dry as he was in 1998

which back's up Ronnie's claims

How does it feel knowing once again your OWN hero crushes your bullshit?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #69 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:54:34 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 21, 2009, 04:52:08 PM

ND, you truly are a master at saying one thing, being proven wrong and then changing your original story...

Ha ha ha owned

Ronnie says he;s better conditioned in 1998 YOU claim he' wrong , Peter McGough claims he's better conditioned in 1998 YOU claim he's wrong too lol Shawn Perine says Ronnie's best showings are 1998 & 2001 yes YOU claim he's wrong LMFAO

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #70 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:56:16 PM »

Quote from: jtsunami on February 21, 2009, 04:51:31 PM

in what the who has the largest GYNO competition? That should automatically disqualify him there.

Bitch tits on the greatest bodybuilder on the planet lol Ronnie made a career out of bitch tits

Necrosis · « **Reply #71 on:** February 21, 2009, 04:57:02 PM »

Quote from: kyomu on February 21, 2009, 12:21:00 PM

Ronnie won all except front double biceps pose.
(This goes to Nasser)

is biceps look like bags of oil. you serious?

jtsunami · « **Reply #72 on:** February 21, 2009, 05:05:17 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 21, 2009, 04:56:16 PM

Bitch tits on the greatest bodybuilder on the planet lol Ronnie made a career out of bitch tits

sure did, as well has the whole being pregnant look, god I hate Ronnie, he is disgusting all that is wrong with BB, I mean he drive a Bentley and doesn't spend good $$ on a quality doc to take out his Gyno?

What an idiot.

jt

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #73 on:** February 21, 2009, 05:09:48 PM »

Quote from: jtsunami on February 21, 2009, 05:05:17 PM

sure did, as well has the whole being pregnant look, god I hate Ronnie, he is disgusting all that is wrong with BB, I mean he drive a Bentley and doesn't spend good $$ on a quality doc to take out his Gyno? What an idiot.

jt

Hulkster · « **Reply #74 on:** February 21, 2009, 05:13:36 PM »

Quote

as well has the whole being pregnant look

the whole Mr. O with a gut was started by none other than ND's hero, Dorian Yates hahahha

you can thank him.