hmmm i don't know why i'm bothering with you.
you claimed thoughts and emotions are not a measurable force - i showed you they are as they can effect a random event generator. They also effect living organisms - read he book the life of plants where studie have shown that negative emotions directed at plants and fruit make them rot/wither quicker etc, while positive emotions have the opposite effect.
Humans are effected in a similar way. As stress has health consequences etc. If someone is mean to you or insults you it can annoy and bother you. Some people who have a shity day at work can take it out on other people. Karma in effect someone is mean to you, that is passed on sooner or later to someone else, which then is transfered to another, etc etc till it reaches the person who started it.
You argue that a dog cannot tell if we are happy or sad 
lets be clear - thoughts and emotions are not random events with humans having no control over them like you claim. We are in command of our thoughts and emotions. Also anger, love, etc alL give off a specific frequency, not a randomly changing one. Also if you are mean to a dog for years, chances are it will become vicious and dangerous.
karma does not know what emotions are, its simply a force that is always trying to balance positive and negative forces out.
regarding reincarnation, there is losts of reports that can not be explained but i cannot prove with science that it exists or not, the same way you cannot disprove if it exists of not.
your claims about human evolution is nonsensicle. And one i can easily counter with the fact that ina hunter gatherer setting more humans living togerther = more food needed, which in a hunter gatherer setting = conflict and death.
this is an argument neither can win, you cannot disprove karma, and although i can explain karma as a force like any other, you will not accept anything i nor any other will say.
Ok, we're just running around in circles about this emotion force thing. Perhaps I'm explaining it wrong or someone here is seriously retarded.
Usually when my ex girlfriend had moments of manic depression where she could throw hissy fits I calmed her down and did not fire back at her. Sometimes I just ignored her until she was calm enough to talk with me. Where was her karma?
According to your theory we're dealing with law of physics here, there can not be an exception. She was mentally unstable and mad and in the end both of us usually ended up spending a nice evening together even though she stirred up mad shit. There was a whole lotta "force" from her side but practically none from mine, there should have been a huge imbalance according to you. "Karma" did not bite her in the ass directly or as a chain of events, not the nanosecond after she got angry or even two days after. I can come up with hundreds of more scenarios where your theory falls flat.
What you're describing is simple communication between human beings. Since we're flock animals we depend on each other and if someone is in a state of distress the rest of group need to know. Therefore facial expressions and different sounds evolved as a tool to communicate. Our ability to speak and form languages is thought to be a bit of a mishap though, scientists are pretty sure they've now found the gene that mutated enabling us to speak and separate ourselves from the rest of the animal kingdom.
Our emotions and expressions are not a force in the same sense a traveling bullet is, they are complicated patterns of messages and interpretations. An emotion is NOT an emotion until it is interpreted by the messenger or the receiver. I highly doubt a plant can interpret a human emotion, actually it was tested by Mythbusters and they said "Busted!".
And of course I know dogs can identify happiness or anger. But it is always not the case and how humans and dogs communicate those feelings are sometimes very different, at least for the dog. Do you have any idea how many times dogs have misinterpreted a human smile for aggression? Happens all the time. And dogs have at least 10,000x the ability of a plant to interpret human emotions and they still get it wrong a big % of the time. As said, human emotions are not absolutes and can not be compared to simple Newtonian physics. Same thing with morse code, those beeps means shit until anyone interprets them.
Does a bullet heading from the barrel towards your skull in 600mph need an interpretation in order to make an impact? No.
Does an emotion being sent by my vocal cords and facial expressions need an interpretation in order to make an impact? Yes. Otherwise they would just be seemingly random patterns of energy waves just floating by without anyone giving a shit.
You do realize that the terms "positive" and "negative" in no matter what language or math are made up by humans? They are only means to interpret/explain forces, not something the "universal order" works by.
But really, you should submit some of your articles to NewSciene, seems like you've come up with some groundbreaking stuff. I bet Stephen Hawking would interested in this "karma" thing. Maybe karma is the explanation for dark matter?
