Author Topic: SHIT economy....we all agree BUT why is no one directly placing the blame .... (Read 2826 times)

ToxicAvenger · « **on:** March 23, 2009, 05:41:48 AM »

where is belongs

BUSH!

lemme explain something in simple math to yall (i need the need to, cause of the "no mor err child left behind" initiative, which means plenty of morons actually got to graduate, and millions of yrs of nature rule (darwanism) got ignored.

when you have (lets say) $100 in the bank, you cant take out $35 (war), and NOT EXPECT TO BE POORER AS A RESULT.

wrong as it sounds.....call it poetic justice.....the mor...err bipeds (cant really quantify em as humans) that did elect him 2cie are the ones losing their jobs homes and hopefully healthcare. Soon they'll croak off of one disease or the other. Hey wait..darwanism again.

the end

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #1 on:** March 23, 2009, 06:14:13 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 05:41:48 AM

where is belongs

BUSH!

lemme explain something in simple math to yall (i need the need to cause of the "no mor err child left behind" initiative, which means plenty of morons actually got to graduate, and millions of yrs of nature rule (darwanism) got ignored.

when you have (lets say) $100 in the bank, you cant take out $35 (war), and NOT EXPECT TO BE POORER AS A RESULT.

wrong as it sounds.....call it poetic justice.....the mor...err bipeds (cant really quantify em as humans) that did elect him 2cie are the ones losing their jobs homes and hopefully healthcare. Soon they'll croak off of one disease or the other. Hey wait..darwanism again.

the end

Sorry, that dog dont bark. The Dems have controlled congress for three years now and have made things much worse.

Both share a ton of blame.

However, Obama is just a continuation of Bush with what he is doing.

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #2 on:** March 23, 2009, 07:35:48 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 06:14:13 AM

Sorry, that dog dont bark.

so the DEMs ignored Osama bin Ladin and went to war with saddam and spend billions , created more Osamas and <ahem> found weapons of mass destruction!

Which BTW SADDAM WOULDA USED IF HE HAD HAD EM (makes sence no? ....huge army about to invade....might have been a good time to use em...??)

plez..dont breed

thankyou

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** March 23, 2009, 07:40:09 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 07:35:48 AM

so the DEMs ignored Osama bin Ladin and went to war with saddam and spend billions , created more Osamas and <ahem> found weapons of mass destruction!

Which BTW SADDAM WOULDA USED IF HE HAD HAD EM (makes sence no? ....huge army about to invade....might have been a good time to use em...??)

plez..dont breed

thankyou

They all voted for the war.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #4 on:** March 23, 2009, 07:57:18 AM »

I love how conservative keep quiet about Bush spending billions of American dollars in Iraq on rebuilding another country while our own country was run into the ditch.

Now Obama wants to spend a fraction of that cost within the US and they are whining all over the place.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #5 on:** March 23, 2009, 08:04:14 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 23, 2009, 07:57:18 AM

I love how conservative keep quiet about Bush spending billions of American dollars in Iraq on rebuilding another country while our own country was run into the ditch.

Now Obama wants to spend a fraction of that cost within the US and they are whining all over the place.

Its not a fraction, its many times more.

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #6 on:** March 23, 2009, 09:53:07 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 08:04:14 AM

Its not a fraction, its many times more.

kinda makes more sence spending on our own country dontcha think?

or does the concept elude you?

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #7 on:** March 23, 2009, 09:55:07 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 07:40:09 AM

They all voted for the war.

sure they did....just like i shat myself right now....

didn't feel like it.....but did it just outta fun....

i know..i know...the analogy eludes you...

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #8 on:** March 23, 2009, 09:57:04 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 09:53:07 AM

kinda makes more sence spending on our own country dontcha think?

or does the concept elude you?

Bingo! I mean, it's not like a single American gained anything from the BILLIONS that was spent on Iraq? Did you get a timeshare? I didn't. And wouldn't want one either. So what has Americans got to show for the money spent over there? Nothing.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #9 on:** March 23, 2009, 09:58:20 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 08:04:14 AM

Its not a fraction, its many times more.

Post numbers.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #10 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:00:16 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 07:40:09 AM

They all voted for the war.

No, what they voted on was a utter LIE and DECEPTION that was presented to them by Cheney and Bush.

Funny how you blindly follow along and defend little Bush just as blindly as he march through 8 years of complete failure to this nation. Good job!

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #11 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:01:50 AM »

Moron. It goes way deeper than 1 person. Bush is to blame for Iraq and that is/was costly, but the recession has more to do with a meltdown of the financial system which dates back to the early to mid 90s. I also believe its a change in culture, both greed and entitlements. Obama is doing more than his share of increasing our national debt, far more than Bush if you read the #s.

There are incentives for short selling in the market, which creates a volitile system. Bush didn't have anything to do with this. This needs to be addressed. Steve Forbes talks inteligently on this subject.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #12 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:02:35 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 09:53:07 AM

kinda makes more sence spending on our own country dontcha think?

or does the concept elude you?

it does not matter if you are spending money you dont have. Even the CBO is saying Obama is lying and grossly inflating his estimates for what the economy will do.

Option D · « **Reply #13 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:04:02 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on March 23, 2009, 07:57:18 AM

I love how conservative keep quiet about Bush spending billions of American dollars in Iraq on rebuilding another country while our own country was run into the ditch.

Now Obama wants to spend a fraction of that cost within the US and they are whining all over the place.

Hilarious.. We dont see an ROI on the WMD war at all. Atleast this is emercency spending to get us on the right track like FDR did. This spending is investment (from what i can see but i might be wrong) Bush was throwing money down a big dry toilet called IRAQ and got some of our men and women killed in the process. Also to the point that "they all voted for war"....it was based off intelligence that was false. So they voted it under false pretences

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #14 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:09:10 AM »

Quote from: big_mal on March 23, 2009, 10:04:02 AM

Hilarious.. We dont see an ROI on the WMD war at all. Atleast this is emercency spending to get us on the right track like FDR did. This spending is investment (from what i can see but i might be wrong) Bush was throwing money down a big dry toilet called IRAQ and got some of our men and women killed in the process. Also to the point that "they all voted for war"....it was based off intelligence that was false. So they voted it under false pretences

So the dumbest ever president Bush was able to fool the brilliant Kerry & Hillary?

Option D · « **Reply #15 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:10:53 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 10:09:10 AM

So the dumbest ever president Bush was able to fool the brilliant Kerry & Hillary?

They got intelligence from the presidents people. Now did they think he was gonna lie and get 2k soliders killed. im guessing no. They followed the intelligence that was given by their president.

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #16 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:33:44 AM »

I am going to post this link everywhere so that you americans can see what Obama is about and figure out what not only Bush was about, but what all presidents were about. They are all tools for the corporate world and the influential. NONE OF THEM HAVE BEEN ANYTHING BUT DISASTROUS FOR AMERICA AND ITS PEOPLE

PLEASE WATCH

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7886780711843120756

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #17 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:47:11 AM »

Mal, I agree about Iraq...at least from the info the general public gets. Perhaps it will lead to a better Iraq but we should never have gone in there and Bush wasted a lot of our taxpayor monies.

However, if you think all the spending the Obama administration is doing is well focused to battle the recession, you are mistaken. He is creating big gov and big programs that cause reliance on gov. This administration will spend more of our money in 20 months than Bush did the whole last 4 years, including war expendatures. Obama is printing and spending money like crazy. Much of it is for democratic projects that have little to directly do with the current recession. We will be paying for his spending over the next decade....and our taxes will have to go up. Some of the $ is well intended but gov is so wasteful and not all the money will be well spent. Look at AIG...look at blank checks being given to the states.

shootfighter1 · « **Reply #18 on:** March 23, 2009, 10:48:48 AM »

Many historical experts believe it was WWII, not FDRs new deal spending that got the US out of the great depression.

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #19 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:32:51 AM »

Quote from: shootfighter1 on March 23, 2009, 10:01:50 AM

Bush didn't have anything to do with this.

translation.....i'm an idiot loving, trunk driving, confederate flag flying , fox watching, weeping while masterbating to sarah palin, trying REALLLLLLLLLLY hard to prove my whiteness ...guy

http://costofwar.com/

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #20 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:35:06 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 10:02:35 AM

it does not matter if you are spending money you dont have.

1) Obama = spending money we dont have FOR OUR OWN COUNTRY

2) Bush did it cause he thought Saddams cock ws bigger....ie NO WMDs found or existed

Translation....Obama is trying to fix the pile of shit left behind by bush

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #21 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:42:14 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 11:35:06 AM

1) Obama = spending money we dont have FOR OUR OWN COUNTRY

2) Bush did it cause he thought Saddams cock ws bigger....ie NO WMDs found or existed

Translation....Obama is trying to fix the pile of shit left behind by bush

QFT

But yet... the onionheads will act as though this simple fact doesn't exist.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #22 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:44:42 AM »

Quote from: ProteinFarts! on March 23, 2009, 11:35:06 AM

1) Obama = spending money we dont have FOR OUR OWN COUNTRY

2) Bush did it cause he thought Saddams cock ws bigger....ie NO WMDs found or existed

Translation....Obama is trying to fix the pile of shit left behind by bush

Grow up. Even Krugman is saying Obama sucks.

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #23 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:48:32 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 23, 2009, 11:44:42 AM

Grow up. Even Krugman is saying Obama sucks.

think i hurts its feeluns......and i didn't even use the word inbred...owell...ya try to be nice... $:-\$

NOW SLOOOOOLY re read the thread title...

its NOT "bush is better than Obama or vice versa"

i wouldn't insult a pile of dog shit by comparising it to bush

the topic pertains to why we aren't seen more blame flung at bush

headhuntersix · « **Reply #24 on:** March 23, 2009, 11:50:41 AM »

The blame Bush crowd starting blaming bush in Jan of 01'. Its Obama's ship now..and its sinking.