Author Topic: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?  (Read 4556 times)

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Usually guys with low calf insertions seem to automatically have good ones; what has been your observation?
I hate the State.

Petrucci

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1969
  • Team Kratos!!!
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2009, 04:25:27 AM »
i think so...there are some exceptions, but in general this is the case...i myself have very high insertions so you can imagine how poor my calves are...  :-\ But its a genetic thing, since everyone in my family has the same case....

There are very few guys with high insertions and good calves...I dont know if im mistaken but Shawn Ray is a case maybe?
!

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2009, 04:25:35 AM »
It can vary for different people. I have seen people with high insertions, yet the calf muscle belly is quite large and they can develop decent calves. Likewise i have seen people with low calf insertions whose calves look like tree stumps and have good size yet poor shape.

I'd say my calves are somewhat "high", yet they are ok size (44cm) and i have a fairly small ankle, which gives them a good taper, so to speak.
No doubt about it...

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23433
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2009, 04:26:36 AM »
Of course - the shorter the muscle the higher the suckage.
Look at folks with long muscle bellies - look way better.

p.s.: Webcke's explanation is way better   :D
.

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16942
  • MAGA
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2009, 04:31:11 AM »
Usually guys with low calf insertions seem to automatically have good ones; what has been your observation?
yes.

short muscle bellie means you will have less to 'fill out'.

so you cant say one with a full muscle bellie have more capacity in that muscle in terms of size.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2009, 04:32:06 AM »
yes.

short muscle bellie means you will have less to 'fill out'.

so you cant say one with a full muscle bellie have more capacity in that muscle in terms of size.

Kind of like high lats?
I hate the State.

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2009, 04:33:18 AM »
Kind of like high lats?

Embrace your high lats!!
No doubt about it...

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2009, 04:34:38 AM »
I've got high insertions in my calves which probably explains why they are shit.  :-\

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16942
  • MAGA
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2009, 04:36:03 AM »
Kind of like high lats?
yep. same thing.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2009, 04:36:30 AM »
Embrace your high lats!!

I embrace my piss poor genetics; Ihave no choice. :-\
I hate the State.

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2009, 04:40:57 AM »
I embrace my piss poor genetics; Ihave no choice. :-\

Such a defeatist attitude....... :'(
No doubt about it...

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2009, 04:45:02 AM »
Such a defeatist attitude....... :'(

Just accepting reality mate, only thing we can do.
I hate the State.

CoolDuck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 290
  • Getbig!
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2009, 04:57:51 AM »
Usually guys with low calf insertions seem to automatically have good ones; what has been your observation?

Yes, this is always the case imo. Impossible to develop much if insertions are high.

CD

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2009, 04:59:09 AM »
Usually guys with low calf insertions seem to automatically have good ones; what has been your observation?
Agreed.

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2009, 05:02:51 AM »
Just accepting reality mate, only thing we can do.

So.......you don't compete, don't think about them. Stop putting so much emphasis on genetics. Even people with the worst genetics can improve their physiques. I'm sure the average person doesn't give a shit that you have high lats.
No doubt about it...

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Do high calf insertions definitionally imply poorly developed calves?
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2009, 05:15:09 AM »
So.......you don't compete, don't think about them. Stop putting so much emphasis on genetics. Even people with the worst genetics can improve their physiques. I'm sure the average person doesn't give a shit that you have high lats.

I don't really. These days I just want a lean atheletic look and maybe improve on some lifts, not much else and I think ultimately attainable. :)
I hate the State.