Author Topic: Haney vs. Yates in 1991. (Read 7117 times)

webcake · « **Reply #2 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:05:03 PM »

Doz getting owned into oblivion.....

tony b · « **Reply #3 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:06:00 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on March 25, 2009, 11:03:07 PM

...

Haney's legs are definitely underrated

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #4 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:17:13 PM »

Quote from: tony b on March 25, 2009, 11:06:00 PM

Haney's legs are definitely underrated

yes i always say this.. may be because of his huge wide torso they looked smaller than their reality!!..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #5 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:18:44 PM »

also lee's calves were good which is something rare among black guys..

11venthhour · « **Reply #6 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:52:17 PM »

this was probably the best contest for his legs, some of his early O wins he looked like he was walking on sticks!

but i think dorian holds his own in this one. i also think haney was a way better poser than dorian.

Wiggs · « **Reply #7 on:** March 25, 2009, 11:55:03 PM »

Haney wins...

11venthhour · « **Reply #8 on:** March 26, 2009, 12:02:24 AM »

Quote from: Wiggs on March 25, 2009, 11:55:03 PM

Haney wins...

no doubt!

but i don't think it was a complete wash out.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #9 on:** March 26, 2009, 12:16:59 AM »

Quote from: 11venthhour on March 26, 2009, 12:02:24 AM

no doubt!

but i don't think it was a complete wash out.

of course it was not..

dorian was the most comparable with lee haney among all his runner ups..

pumpster · « **Reply #10 on:** March 26, 2009, 12:17:35 AM »

They're comparable but Haney Haney the edge in detail and muscle maturity, to be expected of someone nearing the end of the line vs. someone just rising to prominence.

At their best no contest Yates over Haney; they were already close there with Yates far from his best.

Haney's legs looking better there than what was seen prior to that.

11venthhour · « **Reply #11 on:** March 26, 2009, 12:21:19 AM »

i think 92' yates would probably have edged out 91' haney, polotics aside.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #12 on:** March 26, 2009, 01:55:13 AM »

Quote from: 11venthhour on March 26, 2009, 12:21:19 AM

i think 92' yates would probably have edged out 91' haney, polotics aside.

yates 93 for sure but yates 92 was nearly the same as yates 91..

brendan_192 · « **Reply #13 on:** March 26, 2009, 02:04:19 AM »

Dorian's colour is better-its white...he wins hands down

kyomu · « **Reply #14 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:03:31 AM »

Haney wins.

Dorians pec is thin.

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #15 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:52:42 AM »

haney kills him..

calfzilla · « **Reply #16 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:53:47 AM »

Why doesn't Haney get more talk here on GB?

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #17 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:55:02 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on March 26, 2009, 04:53:47 AM

Why doesn't Haney get more talk here on GB?

lack of gh gut, too aesthetic, didn't train to tear tendons, etc

webcake · « **Reply #18 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:55:15 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on March 26, 2009, 04:53:47 AM

Why doesn't Haney get more talk here on GB?

Don't know.....

I think he is overrated though. Good for a few O titles.....but not 8 of them.

BroadStreetBruiser · « **Reply #19 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:56:34 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on March 26, 2009, 04:53:47 AM

Why doesn't Haney get more talk here on GB?

getbig seems to have 2 camps: before yates and after yates. BY & AY

RZA · « **Reply #20 on:** March 26, 2009, 04:58:15 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on March 26, 2009, 01:55:13 AM

yates 93 for sure but yates 92 was nearly the same as yates 91..

Not that much different but still improved and probably would have won. Haney doesn't destroy Dorian here. they're pretty close. Both are complete but haney's chest is much fuller and shoulders a bit fuller also. More muscle maturity of course for Haney. But it's close still.

RZA · « **Reply #21 on:** March 26, 2009, 05:00:14 AM »

Quote from: BroadStreetBruiser on March 26, 2009, 04:56:34 AM

getbig seems to have 2 camps: before yates and after yates. BY & AY

Well, BBing is divided in twoeras: before and after Yates.Non one not even Arnold had such an impact on the Bbing criterias. You might not like those criterias (personnaly I'm against it) but there's no doubt Yates changed the rules like no one before.

lovemonkey · « **Reply #22 on:** March 26, 2009, 05:01:44 AM »

Quote from: calfzilla on March 26, 2009, 04:53:47 AM

Why doesn't Haney get more talk here on GB?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_human_ beings)

Sam · « **Reply #23 on:** March 26, 2009, 05:08:58 AM »

Quote from: webcke on March 26, 2009, 04:55:15 AM

Don't know.....

I think he is overrated though. Good for a few O titles.....but not 8 of them.

So which ones of the 8 did he not deserve?

This should be interesting

RZA · « **Reply #24 on:** March 26, 2009, 05:36:05 AM »

The most controversial of Hany's Sandows is the '90 against Labrada. '89 also could or should have gone to Labrada but it wasn't as clear. I've never seen the picture of '87 but I've heard a lot of people sayin' that Gaspari should have won. So that's five clear wins. Same could be said for Arnold, Yates, Coleman or Zane BTW.