Author Topic: Estrogen good for you?  (Read 2420 times)

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Estrogen good for you?
« on: March 27, 2009, 01:49:25 PM »
There is a thread on powders that briefly mentioned the effects of estrogen. tbombz, io856 and Dustin all claimed that it was good for you and is anabolic and may increase androgen receptors. io856 even went as far as saying that Duchaine claimed that power lifters use to inject themselves directly with estrogen. Dustin claims there are various misconceptions and said that if a cattle rancher had just one drug to choose from to bulk up their cattle it would be estrogen. As far as I know there are basically two compounds used for this, Fina and Synovex. Fina has no estrogen and syno has estrogen at 10% (for every 100mg of test you have 10% of estrogen). So based on that it seems that estrogen plays a secondary role and wouldn't be the first drug of choice. But I'm no cattle rancher.

My question is, if estrogen plays a pivotal role in anabolism why do home brewers go through so much trouble, so much chemical machinations, trying to squeeze out the estrogen inherent in synovex? I mean, 10mg for every 100mg of test doesn't seem like much. Or is it? (Dustin? tbombz? io856?) If you shoot just converted syno sans estrogen removal I doubt that letro/arimidex will blunt the estrogenic effects much because it's suppose to inhibit aromatization. That's pointless if the estro is already there. Maybe nolva would be a better choice since it will inhibit some of the estrogen as it binds directly to the receptors.

staxripa

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2009, 03:06:35 PM »
You end up with an excess of e2 when cycling due to the conversion of test to e2, it then binds with receptors and allows them to do nothing, along with gyno and enlarged prostate.

Just an exercise in memory form me here I'm sure I'm leaving out a lot of science.

luvvsuNOT

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 834
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2009, 04:29:11 PM »
Comments regarding estrogen by previous posters:


from tbombz:

"im tired so im not going deep into it right now. its midnight in cali and ive got schhol in the morning.

-estrogen is anabolic, it may increase the number of androgen receptors, it may have a dose dependant effect on gh[igf1(MGF)]  levels, it improves glucose metabolism, it retains water....etc etc"

From Dustin:

It's been demonized because of the misconceptions floating around the boards and in local steroid circles. Taylor elaborated on it a little. Ask any cattle rancher what one drug he'd pick for bulkin' up his bitches if he had to choose, and it will be ESTROGEN.

Like everything else, it has it's downsides. When people think about estrogen they think about bloat and gyno... all of us do. It's just another part of the bigger picture. More people need to understand it's role before they run to their source, order letro and bang back mgs of that shit with the intent on eradicating it. "HELLO TURTLE DICK!!! Let me introduce you to cock-starved and PISSED OFF girlfriend!!!!!!!!!!11!!1!one!1"   
 
 

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2009, 05:10:50 PM »
You end up with an excess of e2 when cycling due to the conversion of test to e2, it then binds with receptors and allows them to do nothing, along with gyno and enlarged prostate.

Just an exercise in memory form me here I'm sure I'm leaving out a lot of science.

You are correct though.  Those are classic symptoms of excessive aromatase.  1 gm of test a week blows my prostate up.

I think what the posters mentioned saying some E was a good thing is that for overall health it is and for overall weight and strength gains E &T seem to be synergistic. Sex drive is also affected by E   In homeostasis E is present in the adult male. 

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2009, 05:30:23 PM »
You are correct though.  Those are classic symptoms of excessive aromatase.  1 gm of test a week blows my prostate up.

I think what the posters mentioned saying some E was a good thing is that for overall health it is and for overall weight and strength gains E &T seem to be synergistic. Sex drive is also affected by E   In homeostasis E is present in the adult male. 

Balance is the important thing to note.  Excess estrogen is not a good thing no matter what anyone of those guys say.  Yes it plays an important role and having too much or too little can cause problems.

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2009, 06:30:56 PM »
Balance is the important thing to note.  Excess estrogen is not a good thing no matter what anyone of those guys say.  Yes it plays an important role and having too much or too little can cause problems.
QFT

Vet

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Immortal
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2009, 12:17:31 PM »
The estrgen is added to the cattle implants for one thing----bodyfat manipulation which ultimately affects meat flavor.  That flavor comes from intramuscular fat--ie marbeling, that will improve drammatically with a small amount of estrogen added to the anabolc effects of trenbolone.  Steers no longer have their testicles and are dependant on the adrenal glands for all steroid hormones.  The trenbolone maximizes muscle gains, but the estrogen keeps the steers from becoming excessively lean--which will result in "dry", poorly flavored meat.   If you notice, the heiffer labeled implants have lower amounts of estrogen or none at all. Thats because of natural production from the heifers ovaries. 

I really dont' see where this will help a bodybuilder at all. 

liquid_c

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 876
  • Getbig!
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2009, 01:16:36 PM »
A little excess estrogen, good for growth.  Too much, bad.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2009, 02:19:39 PM »
i would say estrogen is "good for you". i would say that estrogen is indirectly anabolic through several different pathways some of which are very potent.



vet, estrogen wont inhibit a bodybuilder from getting lean, in fact it will help them get lean. estrogen in no way promotes fat storeage,  it does however affect fat distribution patterns... where fat is stored. 

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2009, 02:43:21 PM »
i would say estrogen is "good for you". i would say that estrogen is indirectly anabolic through several different pathways some of which are very potent.



vet, estrogen wont inhibit a bodybuilder from getting lean, in fact it will help them get lean. estrogen in no way promotes fat storeage,  it does however affect fat distribution patterns... where fat is stored. 
Oh fuk up dickwad  ::)

Vet

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Immortal
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2009, 05:37:25 PM »
i would say estrogen is "good for you". i would say that estrogen is indirectly anabolic through several different pathways some of which are very potent.



vet, estrogen wont inhibit a bodybuilder from getting lean, in fact it will help them get lean. estrogen in no way promotes fat storeage,  it does however affect fat distribution patterns... where fat is stored. 

And with that, you'd say this is why women naturally carry so much more muscle mass than men do?   

DIVISION

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16278
  • Bless me please, father.....
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2009, 07:01:42 PM »
There is a thread on powders that briefly mentioned the effects of estrogen. tbombz, io856 and Dustin all claimed that it was good for you and is anabolic and may increase androgen receptors. io856 even went as far as saying that Duchaine claimed that power lifters use to inject themselves directly with estrogen. Dustin claims there are various misconceptions and said that if a cattle rancher had just one drug to choose from to bulk up their cattle it would be estrogen. As far as I know there are basically two compounds used for this, Fina and Synovex. Fina has no estrogen and syno has estrogen at 10% (for every 100mg of test you have 10% of estrogen). So based on that it seems that estrogen plays a secondary role and wouldn't be the first drug of choice. But I'm no cattle rancher.

My question is, if estrogen plays a pivotal role in anabolism why do home brewers go through so much trouble, so much chemical machinations, trying to squeeze out the estrogen inherent in synovex? I mean, 10mg for every 100mg of test doesn't seem like much. Or is it? (Dustin? tbombz? io856?) If you shoot just converted syno sans estrogen removal I doubt that letro/arimidex will blunt the estrogenic effects much because it's suppose to inhibit aromatization. That's pointless if the estro is already there. Maybe nolva would be a better choice since it will inhibit some of the estrogen as it binds directly to the receptors.

A small degree of estrogen is good for the heart and can decrease cardiovascular disease and has other healthy properties that have to do with the skin, hair and nails.  Basically, your body needs an amount of estrogen to operate optimally.

In terms of raising cattle, most are injected with a mixture of hormones, including estrogen for optimal growth.

It really depends on what the cattle are being raised for.  (Vet can cover that).

As far as Dustin, io856 and tbombz, you really have to consider the source before you believe what comes out of their mouths.

Dustin is somewhat knowledgeable and he's a Moderator on BOS.

io856 is not a veteran, nor would I call him the most experienced.....

tbombz is a virtual anabolic virgin, and in case you haven't noticed he got exposed as something more of a "google" veteran than anything else.

You learn by doing through experience, not by simply listening to other people who you don't trust nor know personally.

Nolvadex competes for estrogen receptors but doesn't block aromatization at all.

Nolvadex is inferior to any AI.



DIV
I'm a ghost in these killing fields...

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2009, 07:05:32 PM »
Balance is the important thing to note.  Excess estrogen is not a good thing no matter what anyone of those guys say.  Yes it plays an important role and having too much or too little can cause problems.

Yes for sure.  I seem to feel more focused and less emotional with less E floating around LOL.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2009, 12:43:58 AM »
i would say estrogen is "good for you". i would say that estrogen is indirectly anabolic through several different pathways some of which are very potent.



vet, estrogen wont inhibit a bodybuilder from getting lean, in fact it will help them get lean. estrogen in no way promotes fat storeage,  it does however affect fat distribution patterns... where fat is stored. 

can you provide any studies to back this claim up ? i have never heard estrogen burns fat, except from you.
175lbs by 31st July

io856

  • Guest
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2009, 02:20:28 AM »
io856 is not a veteran, nor would I call him the most experienced.....
somebody has a beef  ::)

I was quoting somebody else...

How is that a reflection of my experience or knowledge?

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2009, 02:55:04 AM »
somebody has a beef  ::)


Give it some estrogen  ;D

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2009, 03:44:02 AM »
So what will happen if you inject 400mg/wk of test prop using converted
synovex without removing the estrogen? How much nolva would you have to use to prevent any estro problems since anti-aromatase would be pointless as the estro is already there?

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2009, 11:28:43 AM »
And with that, you'd say this is why women naturally carry so much more muscle mass than men do?   

due to much lower levels of testosterone and a plethora of other biological differences.


can you provide any studies to back this claim up ? i have never heard estrogen burns fat, except from you.

article on how estrogen works

http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/karl-hoffman/contrarian-endocrinology-revisited-estrogen-for-men



Quote
by: Karl Hoffman

Estrogen has been reported to confer a number of health benefits in both males and females, such as the well described effects of increasing bone mass density. Here I want to examine some aspects of estrogen that may be of more immediate interest to bodybuilders and athletes. These include the lipolytic (fat mobilizing) and fat oxidizing properties of estrogen, as well as its anorectic (appetite suppressing) effect. Finally we will look at an emerging area of research: the relative contributions of the various metabolites of estrogen to the overall effects of the parent steroid.

Estrogen as a Lipolytic Hormone
Are male (and many female) bodybuilders misguided in their attempts to limit their exposure to estrogen? After all, it makes a person fat doesn’t it? And cause gynecomastia? Well, certainly for men using anabolic steroids that aromatize, too much estrogen can lead to gynecomastia in susceptible individuals. But what about those of us not using steroids? Should we treat estrogen as our fat producing enemy and even go so far as to attempt to prevent its production by using aromatase inhibitors? Or block its action at the estrogen receptor with agents like tamoxifen?

In fact, there are a wealth of data that implicate estrogen as both an anorectic and antiadipogenic hormone. It is much more likely that progesterone is the culprit in supporting higher levels of gluteofemoral fat that is prominent in women (men tend to store more fat in the abdominal area) (1). The model described in (1) has progesterone as the lipogenic hormone. Before menopause, both estrodiol and progesterone are secreted by the ovaries. After menopause, estrone becomes the primary circulating estrogen produced from aromatization of adrenal androgens (primarily the aromatization of androstenedione to estrone by adipose tissue), while progesterone levels drop dramatically since adrenal production of progesterone is minimal.

In premenopausal women progesterone increases lipoprotein lipase activity, which is greater in the gluteofemoral region, while estrogen suppresses it. Lipoprotein lipase is the body’s primary fat storage enzyme; it is responsible for allowing fats to leave the circulation and enter adipocytes. The progesterone wins out though and before menopause, women tend to have more gluteofemoral fat and less abdominal fat.

From an adaptational viewpoint, it has been argued that women's fat is designed to be stored until needed for lactation and child rearing. Men's is designed to be readily mobilized for fight or flight situations during defense and hunting. This theory may be a bit simplistic as well as sexist; but it does make sense to some degree.

Most likely the notion of estrogenic fat originated from the belief that estrogen upregulates alpha 2 receptors in fat cells, retarding lipolysis. This may be just one facet of estrogen’s actions. If one looks at the net result of estrogen’s effects, to quote a leading expert in the field “Testosterone and GH inhibit LPL and stimulate lipolysis markedly. Oestrogens seem to exert net effects similar to those of testosterone.” (2)

For example, animal studies have shown that testosterone and the nonaromatizing DHT promote alpha 2 adrenoreceptor mediated antilipolytic activity, just as they promote beta adrenoreceptor mediated lipolysis (25).

Interestingly, recent research has even attributed at least part of testosterone's fat burning properties to its local aromatization to estradiol (3). For example when testosterone is administered along with an aromatase inhibitor, LPL activity has been shown to increase (4). This suggests that the aromatization of testosterone to estradiol is responsible for the noted ability of testosterone to inhibit LPL.

There are a number of animal studies where estradiol administration led to significant weight and fat loss. Citing just one, for example

The administration of 17 beta-estradiol (500 micrograms/kg, 2 or 4 weeks) to male rats significantly reduced the body weight...Basal lipolysis and adrenaline-induced lipolysis [due to increase in HSL action] were also significantly enhanced in the epididymal adipose tissue from the male rat treated either with 7 mg/kg estradiol 12 h ahead or with 500 micrograms/kg estradiol for 2 weeks. These results indicate that estradiol exerts strong effects on metabolism of the adipose and these effects seems to be mediated through cyclic-AMP. (5)

This research indicates that in addition to the abovementioned inhibition of LPL, estrogen also stimulates the lipolytic enzyme hormone sensitive lipase.

Some of the most compelling evidence for the antiadipogenic effect of estrogen in both males and females comes from studies of estrogen receptor knockout mice and humans with aromatase deficiency. Both the afflicted humans and the knockout mice exhibit obesity. A detailed look at this topic can be found in a study of estrogen receptor knockout mice (6) Quoting from that study,

The one known human male lacking ER had a body weight approximately 2 SD greater than normal. However, this individual also had increased height because of a lack of epiphysial plate fusion. Thus, continued growth may mitigate potential increases in WAT that might normally occur because of a lack of ER. However, men and women lacking aromatase manifest truncal obesity. This and the insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance observed in both humans lacking ER or aromatase and their murine counterparts emphasize that similar effects accompany loss of ER in both species and strongly suggest ER may regulate adipose tissue in men.


Estrogen as an Anorectic Hormone
I also mentioned that estrogen is a potent anorectic, hunger-suppressing hormone. This effect is thought to be due to an estrogen-induced inhibition in melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) signaling (7). MCH is a neuropeptide found in the hypothalamus that is also thought to be involved in leptin’s regulation of appetite. Leptin, an anorectic hormone secreted from adipose tissue, acts on the specific receptor present on its target neurons in the brain, and suppresses the expression of both MCH and its receptor. So we see that the actions of both estrogen and leptin are at least partly mediated through interactions with MCH. In rats and mice, intracerebroventricular administration of MCH induces hyperphagia, whereas MCH deficiency induced by targeted gene deletion leads to a hypophagia syndrome and loss of body fat.

Under normal conditions, restricted food availability leads to a drop in leptin. Falling leptin levels in turn elevate Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a hunger inducing peptide, and decrease expression of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), the precursor of the anorexic melanocortin -MSH, a hunger suppressing hormone. Both these changes result in elevated MHC, and food seeking behavior is initiated. When high levels of estrogen are present, the normal food seeking brought on by the changes in NPY, POMC, and MHC described above is blocked, as depicted in the diagram below, adapted from (7)

Figure 1. Proposed model of the effects of estrogen on hypothalamic neuronal pathways involved in the regulation of energy balance. A, In response to energy restriction, circulating leptin and insulin levels decrease, resulting in increased gene expression of orexigenic peptides (e.g., NPY) and decreased gene expression of anorexic peptides (e.g., POMC) in neurons of the ARC. These neuronal responses are proposed to increase expression of the orexigenic neuropeptide MCH in neurons of the LHA, which in turn promote increased food intake. B, Estrogen-mediated weight loss and anorexia also lower plasma leptin and insulin, but the expected activation of MCH neurons fails to occur in the presence of estrogen, despite the preservation of "upstream" ARC NPY and POMC neuronal responses to reduced adiposity signaling. This inhibition of MCH neurons by estrogen is hypothesized to contribute to the sustained anorexia observed with chronic estrogen exposure in male rodents. Adapted from Mystkowski et.al. J Neurosci. 2000 Nov 15;20(22):8637-42.


Estrogen Promotes Fat Burning During Exercise
For ethical reasons, the bulk of the research described was carried out in females and male animals. However, one recent study looked at the effects of estrogen administration on energy expenditure in exercising men (8). In this study male subjects cycled for 90 min at an intensity of 65% VO2max following eight days of either estrogen supplementation (2 mg 17beta-estradiol/day) or placebo. Estrogen supplementation significantly decreased carbohydrate oxidation by 5-16% and leucine oxidation by 16% (indicating a sparing effect on glycogen and muscle) whereas it significantly increased lipid oxidation by 22-44% at rest and during exercise. The authors concluded that estrogen influences fuel source selection at rest and during endurance exercise in men characterized by a reduced dependence on amino acids and carbohydrate and an increased reliance on lipids as a fuel source.

The administered dose of estrogen in (8) resulted in an increase in plasma estradiol from a baseline of 125 pM/L to 876 pM/L.

The authors suggest that the change in substrate use during exercise caused by estrogen may result for estrogen related stimulation of beta and possibly alpha adrenergic receptors. I see a problem with this hypothesis, however, since research has shown that beta receptor stimulation during exercise actually has the opposite effect, sparing fat at the expense of glycogen oxidation (9). Whatever the underlying mechanism is, estrogen clearly promotes fat burning in men.

Studies Involving Male to Female Transsexuals
Studies where hormonal treatment was administered to male to female transsexuals are often cited as evidence that estrogen administration to men leads to accumulation of subcutaneous fat.

These studies are typically confounded by the co-administration of progestational antiandrogens along with estradiol (24). The observed increase in subcutaneous fat in these subjects could very well be due to the progestational antiandrogens and the resulting drop in testosterone, which itself is a lipolytic hormone in subcutaneous adipose tissue.

All Estrogens are Not Created Equal
So far we have dwelt on the effects of estrogen itself. However, considerable work has shown that the major metabolites of estradiol and estrone are those hydroxylated (possess an OH group) at either the C-2 or the C-16alpha positions, although forms hydroxylated at the C-4 and C-15alpha are present, but in relatively lesser amounts. There exists a complete divergence in the biological properties of the 2- and 16alpha-hydroxylated metabolites of estradiol. 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1) has been found to exert a modest anti-estrogenic effect in some tissues (10) and is popularly called the “good estrogen”. Studies on its ability to alter Lutienizing Hormone (LH) have yielded variable results, with some studies showing it increases LH production while others report either no change or a slight drop in LH with large doses of 2-OHE1.16alpha-hydroxyestrone on the other is a potent estrogen (11). In addition, it is associated with various cancers and has been shown to be a mutagen (cancer promoting agent).

Figure 2. Pathways of Estradiol metabolism, showing the so-called “good” metabolite 2-hydroxyestrone and the “bad” metabolite 16alpha-hydroxyestrone.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the metabolic pathway depicted in figure 2 showing additional estrogenic metabolites affected by DIM.

Phytochemicals such as indole-3-carbinol (I3C) are components of cruciferous vegetables, which exhibit antitumor activity associated with altered carcinogen metabolism and detoxification. The compound 3,3'-diindolylmethane, (DIM), is a major metabolite of I3C now available in supplement form. DIM directs estrogen metabolism away from “bad” estrogen to the good 2-hydroxyestrone/estradiol metabolites. Moreover, DIM itself exhibits antiestrogenic properties according to some researchers, and estrogenic activity according to others, much as if it were a SERM (12, 24). Among the hypothesized mechanisms of chemoprevention by I3C and DIM is their ability to induce a number of phase I enzymes in liver and colon, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP 3A. Increased activity of phase I drug-metabolizing enzymes can protect against some carcinogens by increasing their rate of oxidative metabolism to less toxic metabolites.

So by taking supplements containing 3,3'-diindolylmethane we can possibly lessen the likelihood of developing prostate and possibly other cancers, since research has shown that 3,3'-diindolylmethane has direct anticancer effects on the prostate independent of its ability to suppress “bad” estrogen (13). However, at least part of the ability of DIM to help prevent prostate cancer may lie is its antiandrogenic as well as antiestrogenic properties. Studies using prostate cancer (LNCaP) cells show that at physiologically obtainable levels DIM acts as a pure androgen antagonist that blocks expression of androgen-responsive genes and inhibits AR nuclear translocation (14).

One theory is that DIM appears to exert its antiestrogenic/antiandrogenic properties by acting as a weak agonist at the so-called aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) (15). The AhR has been extensively studied due to the fact that a number of environmental toxins such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exert their effects by acting as strong agonists of the AhR. Dioxins are well known to disrupt reproductive activity in animals by deranging gonadal, pituitary, and CNS function. TCDD, like DIM acts as an antiestrogen in numerous tissues. At least part of TCDD’s antiestrogenic activity results from activation of proteosomes that degrade the estrogen receptor (16).

It’s intriguing to speculate whether DIM might also be capable of ER degradation in the pituitary, which we noted possesses AhR receptors and is sensitive to TCDD. If so, DIM might block estrogen related negative feedback on the HPTA. Yet another theory on DIM action proposes that in some tissues it activates the estrogen receptor independently of the presence of estrogen by activating the so-called PKA- and MAPK signaling systems (22).

As noted above, some studies show 2-hydroxyestrone has no suppressive effect on the HPTA while other research shows either suppression or enhancement. Another metabolite of estradiol, depicted in figure 3, is 2-hydroxyestradiol. Animal experiments have shown that administration of 2-hydroxyestradiol can override the suppressive effect of estradiol on pituitary LH secretion in males (17). The same study showed that the bad estrogen 4-hyroxyestradiol was able to suppress LH production

As can be seen in figures 3 and 4, both 2-hydroxyestradiol and 2-hydroxyestrone are methylated during their metabolism by the body. Interestingly, 2-methoxyestradiol (2-MeOE2) has a significantly higher affinity for Sex Hormone Binding Globulin than do estradiol and even testosterone (18). This is significant in that 2-MeOE2, by virtue of its higher affinity for SHBG than testosterone, can displace testosterone from SHBG, possibly enlarging the fraction of free, or bioactive testosterone.

16alpha-hydroxyestrone may play a role in a number of diseases other than cancers. For example, the estrogen found in the synovial fluid of rheumatoid arthritis patients is primarily the proinflammatory 16alpha-hydroxyestrone and may be responsible for the inflammation associated with that disease (19, 20). DIM may prove useful in treating or ameliorating the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and other estrogen related autoimmune diseases that primarily affect women. Also of interest is the observation that while estradiol has well-known neuroprotective actions, 2-hydroxy-estradiol appears to be significantly more neuroprotective than its parent, estradiol (21). Of course, standard medical protocols should be followed and a physician’s advice obtained, before self-medicating with DIM to treat any disease.

Since some evidence suggests DIM might generate estrogen metabolites that suppress LH production, it might not be advisable to use DIM as the sole agent during Post Cycle Therapy. When used post cycle with a SERM such as Clomid that stimulates the HPTA, DIM could offer a number of potential health advantages by shunting estrogen metabolites towards the more healthful 2-OH series while at the same time elevating free testosterone levels. Similarly, during a cycle of aromatizable steroids, when estrogen is high and the HPTA is suppressed, DIM use may offer a number of health benefits due to its actions described above.

For a person not using anabolics and unconcerned about the complexities of Post Cycle Therapy, DIM use may confer enough health benefits, such as possible cancer prevention, to warrant its use as a supplement. And, as mentioned above, we may get a boost in free testosterone as well. Long term safety studies in animals have failed to detect any toxicity due to DIM (23).

In summary, while certainly not advocating estrogen supplementation for men, I also believe it is not the evil hormone it is often made out to be. We should accept it for what it is, a naturally occurring part of or normal hormonal milieu, that can be manipulated in form and quantity to better suit the needs of male athletes and bodybuilders by focusing on altering the byproducts of estrogen metabolism.
.



estrogen also has appetite suppresing effects, which would help keep one leaner.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2009, 11:47:45 AM »
Quote
References
1) Price TM, O'Brien SN, Welter BH, George R, Anandjiwala J, Kilgore M. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 Jan;178(1 Pt 1):101-7

2) Bjorntorp P. Hum Reprod 1997 Oct;12 Suppl 1:21-5

3) Ramirez ME, McMurry MP, Wiebke GA, Felten KJ, Ren K, Meikle AW, Iverius PH Metabolism 1997 Feb;46(2):179-85

4) Zmuda JM, Fahrenbach MC, Younkin BT, Bausserman LL, Terry RB, Catlin DH, Thompson PD. Metabolism 1993 Apr;42(4):446-50

5) Tomita T, Yonekura I, Okada T, Hayashi E Horm Metab Res 1984 Oct;16(10):525-8

6) Heine PA, Taylor JA, Iwamoto GA, Lubahn DB, Cooke PS. Increased adipose tissue in male and female estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12729-34

7) Mystkowski P, Seeley RJ, Hahn TM, Baskin DG, Havel PJ, Matsumoto AM, Wilkinson CW, Peacock-Kinzig K, Blake KA, Schwartz MW. J Neurosci 2000 Nov 15;20(22):8637-42

8) Hamadeh MJ, Devries MC, Tarnopolsky MA. Estrogen supplementation reduces whole body leucine and carbohydrate oxidation and increases lipid oxidation in men during endurance exercise. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Mar 8

9) Mora-Rodriguez R, Hodgkinson BJ, Byerley LO, Coyle EF. Effects of beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on substrate metabolism during submaximal exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001 May;280(5):E752-60.

10) Schneider J, Huh MM, Bradlow HL, Fishman J. Antiestrogen action of 2-hydroxyestrone on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 1984 Apr 25;259(8):4840-5

11) Dalessandri KM, Firestone GL, Fitch MD, Bradlow HL, Bjeldanes LF. Pilot study: effect of 3,3'-diindolylmethane supplements on urinary hormone metabolites in postmenopausal women with a history of early-stage breast cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2004;50(2):161-7.

12) Chen I, McDougal A, Wang F, Safe S. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated antiestrogenic and antitumorigenic activity of diindolylmethane. Carcinogenesis. 1998 Sep;19(9):1631-9.

13) Sarkar FH, Li Y. Indole-3-carbinol and prostate cancer. J Nutr. 2004 Dec;134(12 Suppl):3493S-3498S.

14) Le HT, Schaldach CM, Firestone GL, Bjeldanes LF. Plant-derived 3,3'-Diindolylmethane is a strong androgen antagonist in human prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 6;278(23):21136-45.

15) Chen I, McDougal A, Wang F, Safe S. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated antiestrogenic and antitumorigenic activity of diindolylmethane. Carcinogenesis. 1998 Sep;19(9):1631-9.

16) Wormke M, Stoner M, Saville B, Walker K, Abdelrahim M, Burghardt R, Safe S. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates degradation of estrogen receptor alpha through activation of proteasomes. Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Mar;23(6):1843-55.

17) Franks S, MacLusky NJ, Naish SJ, Naftolin F. Actions of catechol oestrogens on concentrations of serum luteinizing hormone in the adult castrated rat: various effects of 4-hydroxyoestradiol and 2-hydroxyoestradiol. J Endocrinol. 1981 May;89(2):289-95.

18) Avvakumov GV, Grishkovskaya I, Muller YA, Hammond GL. Crystal structure of human sex hormone-binding globulin in complex with 2-methoxyestradiol reveals the molecular basis for high affinity interactions with C-2 derivatives of estradiol. J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 22;277(47):45219-25

19) Cutolo M, Sulli A, Capellino S, Villaggio B, Montagna P, Seriolo B, Straub RH Sex hormones influence on the immune system: basic and clinical aspects in autoimmunity. Lupus. 2004;13(9):635-8.

20) Cutolo M, Villaggio B, Seriolo B, Montagna P, Capellino S, Straub RH, Sulli A. Synovial fluid estrogens in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2004 Mar;3(3):193-8.

21) Teepker M, Anthes N, Krieg JC, Vedder H 2-OH-estradiol, an endogenous hormone with neuroprotective functions. J Psychiatr Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):517-23.

22) Leong H, Riby JE, Firestone GL, Bjeldanes LF. Potent ligand-independent estrogen receptor activation by 3,3'-diindolylmethane is mediated by cross talk between the protein kinase A and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Mol Endocrinol. 2004 Feb;18(2):291-302.

23) Leibelt DA, Hedstrom OR, Fischer KA, Pereira CB, Williams DE. Evaluation of chronic dietary exposure to indole-3-carbinol and absorption-enhanced 3,3'-diindolylmethane in sprague-dawley rats. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Jul;74(1):10-21

24) Elbers JM, Asscheman H, Seidell JC, Gooren LJ. Effects of sex steroid hormones on regional fat depots as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in transsexuals. Am J Physiol. 1999 Feb;276(2 Pt 1):E317-25.

25) Bouloumie A, Valet P, Dauzats M, Lafontan M, Saulnier-Blache JS. In vivo upregulation of adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptors by androgens is consequence of direct action on fat cells. Am J Physiol. 1994 Oct;267(4 Pt 1):C926-31.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2009, 06:09:49 PM »
cheers, very interesting  8)
175lbs by 31st July

DIVISION

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16278
  • Bless me please, father.....
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2009, 08:27:00 PM »
somebody has a beef  ::)

I was quoting somebody else...

How is that a reflection of my experience or knowledge?

That kid threw your name out, so you got included in the mix.   ;D



DIV
I'm a ghost in these killing fields...

shrek

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #21 on: March 29, 2009, 11:20:07 PM »
goddamn google whore

shrek

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Estrogen good for you?
« Reply #22 on: March 29, 2009, 11:22:14 PM »
as for cattle goes they use a large amount of estrogen with tren at the end of their grazing to marbleize their flesh also bulking them up before slaughter