Typical one-dimensional dogma-Wheeler's arms lacked detail in general in comparison. Very little inner-arm detail and bis didn't have much detail or vascularity in comparison either.
Then there's the amateurish arbitrary claim that size is irrelevant , simply because Yates is killed in those comparisons.
The problem with Coleman is that he never did the side-tri pose properly. If he had, the size differential would be far more obvious.
Did anyone mention Wheeler's biceps? you go off on tangents about shit no one is talking about
size ALONE is irrelevant which is my point despite not having triceps as large as Ronnies his side triceps is leaps better
And nice default excuse , if Ronnie did the pose correctly

again don't mistake a size differential for being a better pose , more to a pose than who has the bigger ' show muscles '
Lets say for arguments sake Ronnie's triceps are leaps & bounds better , this means what? NOTHING his entire side triceps pose sucks in comparison so it's a moot point