LOL, you post editing wanker, no matter though.
You still havent given a source for the numbers you claim.
So fatty, go on and cite a source that states the romans took 30 million plus slaves.
You do have this information, do you not? if you do not, you are a piss and wind merchant, quel surprise.
BTW:
THE WORLD POPULATION CIRCA ROMAN TIMES WAS APPROX 200-300 MILLION, THUS YOU ARE CLAIMING THE ROMANS HAD 10-15% OF THE WORLDS POPULATION AS SLAVES LOL, YES, YOU REALLY ARE THAT STUPID LOL
LOL, fat fool.
another self owning
this is beyond easy.
when someone edited a post it states that post was edited.
hence you can clearly see my post was not edited.
the entire board can also clearly see you are the dumbest girl ever to type on getbig.
as for your fantasy's regarding the population of the roman empire
remember it lasted for nearly 1500 years. The population in Europe alone now is 731,000,000 people.
here is part of an article to further metaphorically slap you across the face with my cock:
It is impossible, however, to put an accurate figure on the number of slaves owned by the Romans at any given period: for the early Empire with which we are concerned conditions varied from time to time and from place to place. Yet, some estimates for Rome, Italy, and the Empire are worth attempting. The largest numbers were of course in Italy and especially in the capital itself. In Rome there were great numbers in the imperial household and in the civil service - the normal staff on the aqueducts alone numbered 700 (Frontin. Aq. 116-7). Certain rich private individuals too had large numbers - as much for ostentation as for work (Sen. Ep.110.17). Pedanius Secundus, City Prefect in AD 61, kept 400 slaves (Tac. Ann. 14.43.4), Gaius Caecilius Isidorus, freedman of Gaius Caecilius, left 4116 in his will in 8 BC, while some owners had so many that a nomenclator had to be used to identify them (Pliny HN 33.135; 33.26). However, there is evidence to suggest that these cases were not typical - even for great houses. Sepulchral inscriptions for the rich noble gens the Statilii list a total of approximately 428 slaves and freedpersons from 40 BC to AD 65. When these figures are analysed, the number of slaves and freedpersons definitely owned by individual members of the gens is small, e.g. Statilius Taurus Sisenna (consul of AD 16) and his son had six, Statilius Taurus Corvinus (consul ordinarius of AD 45) had eight, and Statilia Messalina, wife of Nero, four or five. Seneca, a man of extraordinary wealth, believed he was travelling frugally when he had with him one cartload of slaves (most likely four or five) (Ep 87.2). References in Juvenal and the Scriptores Historiae Augustae suggest that many non-plebeian Romans had either no slave or merely one or two (Sat. 3.286; 9.64-67,142-7; S.H.A. Hadr.17.6). From evidence such as this Westermann, Hopkins and others are understandably cautious when attempting to come to a total figure for slaves in the city of Rome in the 1st century AD. Hopkins' estimate of 300,000-350,000 out of a population of about 900,000-950,000 at the time of Augustus seems plausible.
see that part in bold - thats for 1 year out of roughly 1500 years.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahaha
owned again you should change your name to veteran_at_getting _owned _by_much_smarter_fatpand
a
