Not on the SMF build Ron is running it doesnt, but nice try, fat ass.
You spastic, at its height, the Roman Empire boasted no more than 70 million people.
In your source - which you obviously havent read - it states figures FOR ROME ALONE over ONE CENTURY, and NOT the '1 year' as you stupidly stated before going on to - IN GHASTLY FASHION - speciously spin out/extrapolate with your nonsensical 'roughly 1500 years' comment, neither of which were supported by the source you cite; but hey, not that you are a dumb cunt or anything.
BOTTOM LINE: CITE A SOURCE THAT STATES THE NUMBER OF SLAVES TRAFFICKED DURING ROMAN TIMES TO BE GREATER THAN THE 30 - 60 MILLION TRAFFICKED DURING THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE, ASSHOLE.
Honestly, you are a fat moron.
Well I would, if that was not infact incorrect.
BTW, while you were furiously hammering away at your keyboard, eager to spew the fatuous content to which we have become accustomed - I was at the gym pulling 300kg for 5 reps on the deadlift, which - alongside several complimentary exercises - afforded me time to reflect on how I am quite the embodiment of a substantial man.
Shortly after this training session, I popped over the road and was blown by a a hot singleton named Sandra, whence again, I reflected on my god given talents just prior to returning home, whereupon I find myself sat here laughing my [quite content] bollocks off at the spectacle that is you; I do so whilst sat here consuming a most delicious meal of rice and chicken.
And then, we have you... honestly, at least concede the fact that you cannot bear to even look at your obese frame whilst naked? I bet even the merest glimpse in the mirror as you wipe your ass is enough to depress you for the week?
LOL, my life is good my friend.
ciao, tubby.
i was so excited to own you again that i mistyped as my thought ran away from me. However that does not deter me from owning you again.
300,000-350,000 slaves in the 1st century AD that was in no way at its height out of an empire that lasted roughly 15 centuries. However being a simpleton i expect nothing less than me having to spoon feed you more evidence. so here:
you want sources:
http://abacus.bates.edu/~mimber/Rciv/slavery.htmstates: The practice of slavery in peninsular Italy varied dramatically from other regions in the Roman empire (Italy imported slaves, largely via warfare). By the time of the principate, scholars believe that 30 to 40% of the total population of Italy was enslaved. In the century between Cicero and Tiberius,
Romans needed 100,000 new slaves per year to satisfy manpower needs. Compare this to the record of American slave holders who averaged about 30,000 new slaves a year (with peaks of 60,000 at the height of the regime). 
http://www.unrv.com/empire/roman-population.phpstates: In the 2nd century AD, The slave population of Rome approached 500,000 on its own, probably half of which were owned by the 600 men of the Senate. Additional estimates have suggested that of the total 65 million people,
2 to 10 million may have been slaves.The above source also points out that 65m is a very conservative opinion of the population of the empire, and states the empire may have been closer to 130million people. If this was the case the slave population could have been anywhere from 4-20 million people in 1 century alone.
Even if we stick with the conservative figures for this 1 century, multiply that by 15 for all the centuries the roman empire existed = 30-150 million slaves.
in short you = Owned again.
However i thank you for pointing out my mistake earlier, it has helped me focus on taking more time in owning you. Unfortunately I was taking owning you for granted after the countless times i have owned you already.
how many times is that now?
also i have not seen any invitation from pillowcunt to phone me to discuss things in person. If i had i would have addressed it, like i did with his talk of meeting him at Victoria station.
you should both consider yourself blessed i even address you on here, you are both substandard humans, an underclass of humans if you will. Talking to me on here may actually enlighten you somewhat as to how ridiculous your statements are.
