Justice Department Statistics About Black On White Race Violence
'The Race War Of Black Against White' by Paul Sheehan
The Sydney Morning Herald , Australia, 20 May 1995
The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
Yet the American news media does not want to talk about the Dirty War,
which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
suggesting, immediately;
No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
retribution against white America.
And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the
population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
than young whites.
Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
been reported in America:
According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
Most victims of race crime about 90 percent are white, according to
the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims",
published in 1993.
Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or
raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks
who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by whites, according to
the same survey.
Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than
whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size
of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
committing more than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of
whites.
According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants
and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate
that whites murder blacks.
These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960's, when
there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of
the modern civil rights movement.
Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparisons
58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
war.
When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
omitted in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
per cent in the reverse).
When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white
Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
American life and American ideals since World War II.
All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its
coverage of black America, a lower standard
Adult black males only make up 1.2 % of the population (ages 16 - 45),
yet commit 74% of all severe violent crime.
"Blacks are as much more likely to be arrested for violent crimes as
men are more likely to be arrested than women. To the extent that
arrest rates are a good indication of actual criminal behavior - and
there is very strong evidence that they are - blacks are as much more
dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women. If people
feel more threatened by unknown men than by unknown women and are
justified in taking additional precautions against them, from a
statistical point of view, they are equally justified in making the
same distinctions between blacks and whites." (New Century Foundation,
"The Color of Crime," 1998, p.1) Want to check for yourself?
http://www.amren.com/color.pdfWhile the Census Bureau often categorizes real Whites separately from
mestizos, the FBI and the Justice Department usually do not. The law-
enforcement agencies of the federal government lump together crimes
committed by Whites, mestizos, Arabs, Jews, various North Africans and
Middle Easterners, and certain Filipinos into the same category,
deceptively labeled "Whites," skewing the apparent White crime total
upwards. When the FBI reports a percentage of crimes as having "White"
perpetrators, we must keep in mind that the report refers to the
combination of Whites and these others, who together formed about 84%
of the US population in 1995. To prevent confusion between real Whites
and all those whom the FBI calls "Whites," we will put the category of
FBI "Whites" in quotation marks.
The FBI Uniform Crime Reports are available on the Internet at
www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm In one of these reports, titled Crime in the
United States, 1995, we can draw several interesting conclusions from
Table 2.8. In 1995, there were 10032 US murders having a single
perpetrator and a single victim. Of these murders, Blacks committed
5175 (51.6%) and "Whites" committed 4476 (44.6%). The Black per capita
murder perpetration rate was over seven times higher than the "White"
rate. There were at least 1303 interracial murders (13.0% of total
murders), of which 753 were committed by Blacks (57.8% of interracial
murders) and 352 were committed by "Whites" (27.0%). The Black per
capita interracial murder perpetration rate was about fourteen times
higher than that for "Whites." There were 699 murders in which Blacks
killed "Whites" (53.6% of interracial murders) and 281 murders in
which "Whites" killed Blacks (21.6%). The average Black was 16.4 times
more likely to kill a "White" than the reverse. How does that square
with what you heard in television news reports during the same period?
And what does that tell you about the media?
A well-known, but little examined, publication is Statistical Abstract
of the United States, 1996, which is available on the Internet at:
http://www.census.gov/prod/2/gen/96statab/96statab.html or can be
purchased at a bookstore under the title The American Almanac
1995-1996. Several tables of data in this publication contain racial
information that is generally unknown by the American public, though
usually data from two or more tables must be brought together in order
for the racial significance to become clear. For example, when the
racially resolved populations of major US cities are taken from Table
46 and correlated with the per capita murder rates of the same cities
taken from Table 311, it becomes clear that cities that, in 1995, were
nearly all-White had relatively very few murders (e.g., Mesa,
Anchorage, St. Paul, Colorado Springs) and that the per capita murder
rate rises with increasing percentages of non-Whites (Miami, Los
Angeles, Newark), especially Blacks (Detroit, Atlanta, Baltimore, St.
Louis, Birmingham, New Orleans). It is interesting that the government
publication had no special table to permit someone to more easily
appreciate that fact.
Table 2.6 in Crime in the United States, 1995, contains murder rates
that are broken down by both race and age. When this information is
correlated with the racially resolved US population data in Table 24
of Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996, we can determine
that Blacks in any age group are more likely to commit murder than
"Whites" of the same age. In fact, there is no age group for which the
Black per capita murder perpetration rate is low enough to be "merely"
triple the "White" rate. If you feel up to doing interpolations and
more UCR file downloading, you can determine that the fact expressed
by the previous sentence holds true for 1996, 1997 and 1998 (latest
available figures), as well as for 1995.
Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census
data, however, disproves that hypothesis. How? In 1995, among the
American poor, there were 16.3 million Whites (real ones), 10.0
million Blacks, 8.6 million "Hispanics," and 1.4 million Asians.
Blacks comprised about 27.6% of the American poor. Those poverty
numbers can be verified at
http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95/povest1.html.
During that year, Blacks committed about 54% of all US murders.
Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder information comes, counts
"Hispanics" as "Whites," making the total number of poor persons
eligible to be committing murders as "Whites" about 24.8 million.
These "Whites" comprised 68.5% of the American poor, but committed -
at most - only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful
assumption that Asians and Amerindians committed none. The evidence
argues against the liberal hypothesis that poverty causes crime.
Indeed, the US Department of Justice states baldly, "Racial
differences exist" at
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm. The BJS recently also
began to publicize the fact that Blacks are 7 times more likely than
Whites to "commit homicide," in addition to their earlier statement
that Blacks are 6 times more likely to "be murdered" than Whites. Even
allowing for the slight language bias with respect to the use of the
words "homicide" and "murder,"* that is a remarkable departure from
"political correctness" for a federal government agency to permit
itself.
*Not every homicide is a murder, however the Bureau of Justice
Statistics would have no official interest in justifiable homicides,
as these are not crimes, and it would have limited interest in
accidental homicides, as these are often not crimes, though they may
be the occasion for action by civil courts.
Sometimes, after liberals see their "poverty causes crime" hypothesis
go down in flames, they shift over to a kind of "class envy" argument.
Suddenly, it isn't primal necessity that drives all those poor Blacks
to crime - it's envy instead, for which of course the Black murderers
should not be blamed. In the rural areas, the liberals say, people are
spread out and rich and poor don't necessarily have to interact. But
in the cities, the economic differences are more visible, and so more
likely to incite violence, and hence the liberals give us the "degree
of urbanization" hypothesis to explain Black violence. In the
preceding graph, the US states and the District of Columbia are
positioned according to their respective percentages of Blacks and
mestizos in the resident population. It is rather easy to see that the
Whitest states have the lowest rates for violent crime (murder, rape,
armed robbery and aggravated assault were considered in making the
graph). Somewhat higher rates of violence come with increasing
percentages of mestizos, but the largest increase comes with
increasing percentages of Blacks. Anomalous points are probably the
result of anomalous situations, but the trend is clear.
Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate
racial group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer
distinguish between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking
Indians for the most part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped
together in one ethnic pot. The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the
U.S. do not exist, at least not in the ethnic sense when it comes to
the FBI compiling criminal statistics for mainstream and news
organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are not only Hispanics,
but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North Africans,
Iranians, Iraqis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees from the
former Soviet Union.
The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and
the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being
white?" The answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census
Bureau, along with mainstream media purposely distort criminal
statistics and conveniently classify Mexican-Americans as white
because they do not want the American public to know the truth--that
Blacks are responsible for committing the vast majority of crimes here
in the United States.
For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks,
who compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or
a whopping 58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8
per 100,000. Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed
an estimated 2,242 murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76
percent of the U.S. is White (European-American) and they committed
only 29.5 percent of the murders. On the other hand, Black and
Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21 percent of the population,
yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the murders in the
U.S. during 1993.
This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as
likely to commit murder as a White person. Since this information is
not deemed "politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black
segment of society, it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita
basis for whites by backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic
groups.
Here are some more shocking statistics:
More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.
Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by
Blacks in 1992.
In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were
committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S. Blacks under 18 are
more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than Whites
the same age. Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites,
although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population. On a
per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than
Whites. Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S.
in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White
victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.
1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S.
each year are interracial. Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000
people were killed in interracial murders in the U.S., compared to
58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and 38,000 killed in Korea.
The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil
Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article
in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his
article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in
the U.S. mainstream media. One wonders how many Whites have to be
killed by Blacks before the N.Y. Times and Dan Rather types break the
conspiratorial silence about the number of White casualties in the
guerrilla war being waged against them by Blacks.
Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime
statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12%
of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males
about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent
crime.
Mr. Taylor reveals:
1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.
3) 73% of all "justified self-defense" killings are committed by
Blacks.
4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all
times.
5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are
Blacks.
In 1989, the FBI reported the following:
A) Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.
B) Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites.
C) Blacks commit 14 times more murders than Whites.
D) Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.
E) Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White
neighborhoods.
F) There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985 (the
last year the FBI
"chose" to report this information). Some nine out of every
ten were committed by
Blacks against Whites.
G) Black males (6% of the population) make up 46% of the nation's
prison population.
Arrests by Race, 1993:
The following statistics are contained within the Information Please
Almanac 1996,
p. 853. The original source of this information is the Department of
Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for
the United States, 1993, released Dec. 4, 1994.
These statistics once again indicate that Blacks are committing a
grossly disproportionate amount of the crimes. However, once again it
should be noted that the classification, "White," is very misleading
because even though Hispanics are not White and do not even consider
themselves White, the FBI has chosen to include their crimes among
those committed by Whites.
As a consequence, crimes by White people are substantially less than
the numbers would otherwise indicate. In fact, the statistics below
indicate that White European people actually commit far fewer crimes
percentage-wise than their percentage of the population.
I am the president of New Century Foundation, which Mr. Hutchinson
says is behind "a full-blown national campaign to alert whites to the
danger of hate crimes committed by blacks." In fact, we are interested
in inter-racial crime of all kinds, of which officially-classified
"hate crimes" are an insignificant percentage.
Among the findings we have reported but that the media are deeply
reluctant to publicize:
* Blacks commit 90 percent Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial
crimes of violence that occur in the United States every year, and are
more than 50 times more likely to commit violence against whites than
vice versa. In the case of robbery, or "mugging," blacks are more than
200 times more likely to attack whites than vice versa.
* There is actually more black-on-white than black-on-black violence.
When blacks commit violent crime they target whites just over half the
time. When whites commit violent crime, only two to three percent of
their victims are black.
* High rates of anti-white violence cannot be explained by arguing
that blacks are victimizing the people they think more likely to have
money. Only 15 percent of black-on-white violent crimes are robberies,
which have an obvious monetary motive. The rest are simple and
aggravated assaults, rapes, and murders--few of which are likely to
have a monetary motive.
* Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit what are officially
classified as hate crimes. The "white" rate is actually inflated by a
misleading classification system in which Hispanics are a victim
category but not a perpetrator category. The same Mexican who is a
"Hispanic" victim of a hate crime becomes "white" if he is a
perpetrator.
* Blacks are as much more likely than whites to commit violent crime,
just as men are more likely than women--which, of course, is why there
is racial profiling by the police (and by everyone else, for that
matter).
These findings and many more are explained in meticulously documented
detail in our recent report, The Color of Crime. Ordering information
is on our web page at:
www.AmRen.com.
We think it is important to understand the extent and nature of inter-
racial crime, not for the reasons Mr. Hutchinson attributes to us but
because policy should be based on knowledge rather than ignorance.
Jared Taylor, President
New Century Foundation
Oakton, VA
703 716-0900
JarTaylor@xxxxxxx
America's Victims - 12,000 Daily
