Author Topic: Levrone 2000 prejudging  (Read 4046 times)

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Levrone 2000 prejudging
« on: April 09, 2009, 09:19:17 AM »
 :o


ironneck

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14419
  • team young getbiggers
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2009, 09:21:02 AM »
the shitty quality would turn even fat dave into a levrone

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2009, 09:23:49 AM »
the shitty quality would turn even fat dave into a levrone

correct

DeketheCreep

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2567
  • then does a head stand and spread his ass apart!
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2009, 09:24:24 AM »
striated delts,peaked biceps,big bulge,barndoor lats
Levrone had it all

dustin

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2009, 09:24:59 AM »
Huge as a black cock. Uncrowned Mr. O.

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16988
  • MAGA
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2009, 09:25:31 AM »
Amazing poser.

Mr. Levrone himself said 2000 was his best ever. I don't know though his legs where not as good that year.

RZA

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2009, 09:25:36 AM »
Phenomenal upper body but if he wanted to win the O with that physique, the rest of the line-up should have been composed of guys in wheelchairs.


Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2009, 09:25:39 AM »
:o



I love how it takes him 3 minutes approx to hit each pose.

ironneck

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14419
  • team young getbiggers
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2009, 09:26:22 AM »
i still find it funny how people think older bbers were better..i mean that's correct but the shitty quality makes them look 1000 times better

TrapsMcLats

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2801
  • Lift Heavy. Lift Hard.
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2009, 09:59:43 AM »
coleman destroyed him from the back and levrone had no legs that year.  He was sharp no doubt, but that package was not nearly enough to take down coleman.

On_Swole

  • Expert
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 874
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2009, 10:13:13 AM »
Levrone looked great, but agree 100% about his legs. I also think his condition was superior at the '92 O and '94 AC. Regarding Coleman, this was actually my favorite year for him. He wasn't as hard as say '98, but damn if he wasn't just a beast at 264 lbs. Waist was still small as well.






Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2009, 10:26:57 AM »
his calves look fukkin big

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2009, 10:49:49 AM »
i still find it funny how people think older bbers were better..i mean that's correct but the shitty quality makes them look 1000 times better

i still find it funny how people think older bbers were better..i mean that's correct but the shitty quality makes them look 1000 times better

Dude that video of Levrone doesnt do any justice to how he really looked on stage, i have the 2000 Olympia DVD and that was arguably the best condition of his career.
The shitty quality covers up cuts, detail, vascularity etc

Heres a more accurate interpretation on how he looked on stage


bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2009, 10:50:41 AM »
another


Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40865
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2009, 10:59:11 AM »
Dude that video of Levrone doesnt do any justice to how he really looked on stage, i have the 2000 Olympia DVD and that was arguably the best condition of his career.
The shitty quality covers up cuts, detail, vascularity etc

Heres a more accurate interpretation on how he looked on stage



He did look great.  Ronnie still better.
7

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2009, 11:11:29 AM »
even worse was 2002 where Ronnie won looking like this  ::)

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2009, 11:14:38 AM »






 ::)

Ron can't believe he won

DeketheCreep

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2567
  • then does a head stand and spread his ass apart!
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2009, 11:16:09 AM »
even worse was 2002 where Ronnie won looking like this  ::)
i think thats 03

does anyone remember when levrone hosted the olympia on PPV in 03 or 04 and he just stared at the camera with the crazy eyes?
 ;D

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2009, 11:16:40 AM »
He did look great.  Ronnie still better.

Ya Ronnie really blew everyone away that year, big as a foooking house , sharp and detailed.

No competition.

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2009, 11:18:53 AM »
 :-X



does he have synthol in his calves there? ND did out say he used synthol in his calves



 ???





Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2009, 11:20:43 AM »
:o


you talk about being natural but you worship the one bodybuilder who was more "all drugs" than anyone in history.

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2009, 11:22:36 AM »
Ronnie is telling Kevin that he can not keep with his most muscular  ;D





ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2009, 11:26:11 AM »
you talk about being natural but you worship the one bodybuilder who was more "all drugs" than anyone in history.


you can't be natural and be a fan of a pro?  ???
i guarantee he used less than most on the olympia stage
when talking about pro bodybuilding, you can't bring up "who used more drugs"
they all used them, even playing field

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2009, 12:09:12 PM »

you can't be natural and be a fan of a pro?  ???
i guarantee he used less than most on the olympia stage
when talking about pro bodybuilding, you can't bring up "who used more drugs"
they all used them, even playing field

Levrone was the most all drugs bodybuilder ever. Seriously I know you have a hulkster style man crush on him but he really all drugs. Good genetics for drug response. Ronnie still handed him his ass though.

Luolamies

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2520
  • Getbig!
Re: Levrone 2000 prejudging
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2009, 12:15:36 PM »
LEVRONE is one of the best of all time, no doubt about that. His delts were allways absolutely insane. I think he should had won the O 2000. It must still sting him that he didn't win it, because he was the best on that day.

One thing that i cannot understand is how come he keeps himself so small these days. I know that it's because of the acting, but when you are one of the best of all time it's weird that you'll be happy with 180 or what ever...
TEST+DECA+DBOL=BIG