Author Topic: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?  (Read 1698 times)

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
At my gym I can lift a lot more using the Smith machine. I remember at other gyms it was the opposite, maybe they were older machines and carried extra weight, not sure.
E

Butterbean

  • Special Guests
  • Getbig V
  • ******
  • Posts: 19324
All the ones I've used have been lighter.
R

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
i can always lift more on the smith machine.

dunno why tho.

G

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
You don't have to stabilize the weight, peoples.

LatsMcGee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7464
  • Getbig!
The bar is also a lot lighter on most smith machines than an olympic bar.

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads

You don't have to stabilize the weight

I thought about that, but I think they is some spring or something in it or the bar is lighter as well.
E

Drama Queen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1095
  • "Silence is argument carried on by other means''
I thought about that, but I think they is some spring or something in it or the bar is lighter as well.
counterweight

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
In my gym the smith machines are lighter than free weights,they are new though

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum

wes mantooth

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3388
  • Dorothy Mantooth is a saint!
most modern smith machines are counter weighted (as drama states). this equates to the bar on its own being 15-20lbs depending on the manufacturer.

that would make your lifts go up 25-30 pounds from the get. add stability to the equation.....and you have a considerably "stronger" lift...

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #10 on: April 18, 2009, 05:01:26 PM »
At my gym I can lift a lot more using the Smith machine. I remember at other gyms it was the opposite, maybe they were older machines and carried extra weight, not sure.

Because it gives you more balance.

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #11 on: April 18, 2009, 05:14:31 PM »
Do they grow muscle like free weights?

shrek

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #12 on: April 18, 2009, 05:18:27 PM »
This.
it has about 20lbs of counter weight to make the movement smoother so if you bench 300lbs really it is 280lbs

fearANDloathing

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
  • Deep in The Plak Tow. Don't Fuck with me!
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2009, 09:02:36 AM »
Smith machines are garbage. Some gyms won't even include them anymore unless members ask for it and rightfully so.
It's grating to see some jack ass with horrible form Smith Squat 4 plates per side when he can't even do 225 on a free bar correctly.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2009, 09:06:37 AM »
Smith machines are garbage. Some gyms won't even include them anymore unless members ask for it and rightfully so.
It's grating to see some jack ass with horrible form Smith Squat 4 plates per side when he can't even do 225 on a free bar correctly.

they are no more "garbage" than any other machine.  As part of a workout, they are fine.  Don't worry about the bruised ego from seeing somebody act like they can squat 405, because they do it on a SM.  Just worry about yourself.  :)

Awesomo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 858
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2009, 09:08:02 AM »
Smith machines are garbage. Some gyms won't even include them anymore unless members ask for it and rightfully so.
It's grating to see some jack ass with horrible form Smith Squat 4 plates per side when he can't even do 225 on a free bar correctly.

At the gym about a month ago i had to rescue a guy that got buried doing bench press on the smith machine. He couldn't move the bar the inch upward he needed to lock it in. I still made him work for it though just giving him a couple fingers of spotting, i mean i'm not here to lift the weight for him  ;D

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2009, 09:11:05 AM »
they are no more "garbage" than any other machine.  As part of a workout, they are fine.  Don't worry about the bruised ego from seeing somebody act like they can squat 405, because they do it on a SM.  Just worry about yourself.  :)

Well they are a pretty piss poor machine.  They are terrible for squatting.  I agree who cares if someone wants to use one so be it.  I used to use them for shoulder pressing and still do.  I just get an amazing pump that I don't get from anything else.  But they definitely are an awkward unnatural machine. 

Awesomo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 858
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2009, 09:30:13 AM »
Well they are a pretty piss poor machine.  They are terrible for squatting.  I agree who cares if someone wants to use one so be it.  I used to use them for shoulder pressing and still do.  I just get an amazing pump that I don't get from anything else.  But they definitely are an awkward unnatural machine. 

If i have a spotter I won't touch that machine for anything besides shrugs. If i am by myself though and I want to go heavy i happily use it.

burn2live

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2009, 09:37:03 AM »
I hate smith machines  >:(

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2009, 09:38:09 AM »
I lift less on our smith than with freeweights.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2009, 09:46:25 AM »
I hate smith machines  >:(
Hate!? That's a strong word to use in reference to an inanimate object. Maybe your best friend, named Smith, boffed your girlfriend?     :D

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2009, 09:50:29 AM »
I lift less on our smith than with freeweights.
Same.  Mine has a rather thick bar that makes it a bit more difficult than regular Bench Press with a Barbell.

Awesomo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 858
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2009, 09:55:22 AM »
I lift less on our smith than with freeweights.

Agreed. I do incline press more on free weights than smith. I think the restricted range of motion is the problem. I can't go through my normal lifting arc where I am the strongest.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16164
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2009, 09:59:24 AM »
Agreed. I do incline press more on free weights than smith. I think the restricted range of motion is the problem. I can't go through my normal lifting arc where I am the strongest.

Exactly, you can't get all the supporting muscles involved with a guided Range of motion. I lift way less on the smith machine at all lifts opposed to free weigths.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Generally speaking are Smith Machines supposed to be lighter than FWs?
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2009, 10:48:16 AM »
The smith machine at my old gym is about 30 years old and it's heavy as hell. Most of the time if i'm there the only thing i will use it for is seated behind the neck presses (the gym lacks a military press) and i can only put about 2 tens on each side and that's pretty heavy. I doubt it's been oiled in about 10 years too.