This is what? '94 or '95 nasser, right? Lighter, better definition. Lost it when he added mass.
yes from his back but from the front he still looked great and defined at his heavy version..
nasser's back never came close to Levrone or Yates
Levrone's back was actually very good but, true, nowhere close to Yates. The only person who can compete with Yates in that department is Ronnie and everybody knows it. I wouldn't even compare Haney's back to post-92 Dorian's.
levrone's back was good but not as good as the rest of him.. same as his calves and his upper legs (except at few shows where he presented great quads)..
levrone is not bald.
I don't get how Nasser was criticized for not having a good back when that picture shows it to be one of the best I've seen.
who cares. That's like arguing over Douglas and Lincoln's slave policies.