Haney admitted that in 1991 he finally peaked the day OF the contest not like all previous years where it was either the day before or the day after . and again he already competed at 257 pounds and guess what his conditioning suffered for it so what does that tell us? that he couldn't compete at higher bodyweights while maintaining his conditioning which wasn't as stellar as Dorians in the first place.
Actually, I believe his words were that he finally LEARNED how to peak.
The point is that this whole idea that Haney had simply maxed out his size and conditioning potential simply has little merit to it, espeically since he retired at the tender age of 31, just 2-3 years older than Yates.
And, it's mainly propped up by Yates fans, who are a bit miffed that Haney beat their guy.
And Lou looked much better in the 70s in my opinion , his gut and his implants looked atrocious , Loe was heavier obviously due to GH use but he really didn't look better , another example of a guy adding weight with an ill effect was Shawn Ray who competed at 215 pounds instead of his normal 205 and guess what? his conditioning was off , it's extremely hard to put on quality size while maintaining density & dryness
The issue with Lou Ferrigno isn't whether he looked "better" in the 70s vs. the 90s. Ferrigno was able to increase his size and definition. Calf issue aside, he looked unreal in 1993, where he placed 10th at the Olympia.
And I used him to make the point that, if he can have a size and conditioning increase of that magnitude, after taking all those years off and being in his 40s, there's no reason to suggest that Haney couldn't have done something similar.
Suggesting that Haney was in the twilight of his career, while Yates was just getting started, is what some Yates' fans do to stomach the fact that The Awesome one defeated the Shadow, in their lone appearance onstage together.