Author Topic: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed  (Read 47366 times)

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #50 on: April 26, 2009, 09:11:08 AM »
hahaha MELTDOWN

you try far far too hard with these rambling posts.


pathetic attempts at an owning, perhaps that worked on the icke forum but not on getbig grandpa.



These post were mono-chromatic 10 days ago.

They have now entered a new class of being - EPICLY-MONO-CHROMATIC- in theme

How many words does your vocabulary contain, FFS.

What was your user name over on 'Micks board' ??

Still post over there ??

'DAMY' has - NEVER - posted on Icke's board, WTF planet are you on dude ??
Growth/noob loves me

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #51 on: April 26, 2009, 09:15:47 AM »
These post were mono-chromatic 10 days ago.

They have now entered a new class of being - EPICLY-MONO-CHROMATIC- in theme

How many words does your vocabulary contain, FFS.

What was your user name over on 'Micks board' ??

Still post over there ??

'DAMY' has - NEVER - posted on Icke's board, WTF planet are you on dude ??

 ::)
175lbs by 31st July

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #52 on: April 26, 2009, 09:21:00 AM »


Is that an offer ??
I bet you tit's are big enough, that if it were dark, it could almost be convincing  ;D
Growth/noob loves me

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #53 on: April 26, 2009, 09:23:10 AM »
Is that an offer ??
I bet you tit's are big enough, that if it were dark, it could almost be convincing  ;D

don't get excited pillOWNED - you are beneath me in all aspects.
175lbs by 31st July

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #54 on: April 26, 2009, 09:31:18 AM »
don't get excited pillOWNED - you are beneath me in all aspects.

That is an ugly thought  ::) not one I will linger on.
Growth/noob loves me

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #55 on: April 26, 2009, 10:51:42 AM »
You from UK pillowtalk?
You seem to know your stuff about the BB scene there

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2009, 10:54:02 AM »
= lack of understanding of the pharmacokinetics of various esters of Testosterone.
Winstrol is 'DHT' based 'Dyhrdra-Test' & is only really used to harden up a physique that is sub 9% BF.

Pharmacokinetics (in Greek: “pharmacon” meaning drug and “kinetikos” meaning putting in motion, the study of time dependency; sometimes abbreviated as “PK”) is a branch of pharmacology dedicated to the determination of the fate of substances administered externally to a living organism. In practice, this discipline is applied mainly to drug substances, though in principle it concerns itself with all manner of compounds ingested or otherwise delivered externally to an organism, such as nutrients, metabolites, hormones, toxins, etc.

Pharmacokinetics is often studied in conjunction with pharmacodynamics. Pharmacodynamics explores what a drug does to the body, whereas pharmacokinetics explores what the body does to the drug. Pharmacokinetics includes the study of the mechanisms of absorption & distribution of an administered drug, the rate at which a drug action begins and the duration of the effect, the chemical changes of the substance in the body (e.g. by enzymes) and the effects and routes of excretion of the metabolites of the drug.

i have no idea what you wanted to say with this post.

it certainly doesnt answer the question i posed to you.


wordy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 629
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #57 on: April 26, 2009, 11:12:11 AM »
You from the UK ?? know the characters involved in this saga ??
Kerry-K was in 97/99 a fairly big player on the Manchester scene, he outed Paul not long after they fell out (of the window, LOLOLOLz)

Manchester's underground & the BB'ing scene were one & the same, door men/debt collectors/drug dealing, etc......
You need big lads around in these games  ;)

Some say he jumped, others say he fell, others say he was helped, and still others say he was helped out the window by Kerry Kayes etc: p

DAMY

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 439
  • I shit myself, therefore I am.
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #58 on: April 26, 2009, 12:12:09 PM »
Kerry Kayes isn't and wasn't big enough to throw a big guy out of a window. Not alone, at any rate.

Do the likes of him do their own dirty work anyway?

Only when under stress or when sense is overtaken by ego.


DAMY

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2009, 12:21:30 PM »
i have no idea what you wanted to say with this post.

it certainly doesnt answer the question i posed to you.




I guess that failure to understand the science involved in 'Pharmacokinetics' would leave you feeling this way.
Oh &, you didn't ask me any questions  ??? ???
What is with this fucking Bob Marly avatar ?? how many others of you are there ??
Growth/noob loves me

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #60 on: April 26, 2009, 12:24:48 PM »
Kerry Kayes isn'tand wasn't big enough to throw a big guy out of a window. Not alone, at any rate.

Do the likes of him do their own dirty work anyway?

Only when under stress or when sense is overtaken by ego.


DAMY

He might have had 'John Hodgson' help him, but then, John would not have been able to reach the window, so that can't be it either  ??? ???
Growth/noob loves me

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #61 on: April 26, 2009, 12:27:04 PM »
You from UK pillowtalk?
You seem to know your stuff about the BB scene there

Indeed, some of the time I reside in London.
Although, I doubt for much longer shall I be reachable in the 'EU'  ;D
Growth/noob loves me

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #62 on: April 26, 2009, 12:31:01 PM »
i found it on google some time ago and saved it. I was recently looking through my pc for an article and came across it, and thought it was funny.

i'm 31.

Oi  -Teddy bear.
What do you do for a living ??

& what hospital were you born in. ???
Growth/noob loves me

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #63 on: April 26, 2009, 12:45:20 PM »
I guess that failure to understand the science involved in 'Pharmacokinetics' would leave you feeling this way.
Oh &, you didn't ask me any questions  ??? ???
What is with this fucking Bob Marly avatar ?? how many others of you are there ??
im not an expert, but i understand pharmacokinetics pretty well.

disco_stu said that you cannot compare to steroids mg for mg to assess whch one is stronger than the other.
this guy's a tool.

i love the part where he bags people for not knowing basic pharmacology yet his argument that anadrol "must be weak" is because it comes in 50mg tabs. ::)

what a moron.

its no wonder people dont "get it"...its because theres nothing to get.

a certain milligram dosage of a drug is related only to how it works physiologically. one dosage cant be compared directly to another!...lol...

i stopped reading right there when i realised this guy has been schooled by the underground.

so i posed the question =
are you implying that =

dbol is stronger than winstrol because 50 mg of dbol produces gains while 50mg of winstrol doesnt

 is flawed arguiment?

you provided no answer as to how you felt on that issue.





The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #64 on: April 26, 2009, 12:47:31 PM »
Indeed, some of the time I reside in London.
Although, I doubt for much longer shall I be reachable in the 'EU'  ;D
Dunno wot d fuck dat means man haha
Maybe your goin on the run,I planned doin same thing recently but things straightened demselves out

DAMY

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 439
  • I shit myself, therefore I am.
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #65 on: April 26, 2009, 12:57:53 PM »
FatPandemic!

How long have you been working out, all in?


DAMY

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #66 on: April 26, 2009, 01:20:04 PM »
im not an expert, but i understand pharmacokinetics pretty well.

disco_stu said that you cannot compare to steroids mg for mg to assess whch one is stronger than the other.
so i posed the question =
you provided no answer as to how you felt on that issue.






Winstrol is Dy-hydra-testosterone based.
Methandrostenolone, or Dbol are not,Chemical Structure: 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-1,4-androstadien-3-one,  thus you will get better gains with Dbol Mg for mg - not that I would use either 'TBH' unless sub 8% (Winny) for 4 weeks max.

Hence the 'Pharmacokinetics' explanation.
You see when you talk these things through, they become a little clearer don't they ??
Growth/noob loves me

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #67 on: April 26, 2009, 01:23:25 PM »
Dunno wot d fuck dat means man haha
Maybe your goin on the run,I planned doin same thing recently but things straightened demselves out

My running from the law days are long gone bro  ;)
I got my house spun last year (Oct) & they walked away empty handed, LOLOLOLOLz.

More to do with income based discussions, rather than a custodial evasion.
Growth/noob loves me

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #68 on: April 26, 2009, 01:23:25 PM »
Winstrol is Dy-hydra-testosterone based.
Methandrostenolone, or Dbol are not,Chemical Structure: 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-1,4-androstadien-3-one,  thus you will get better gains with Dbol Mg for mg - not that I would use either 'TBH' unless sub 8% (Winny) for 4 weeks max.

Hence the 'Pharmacokinetics' explanation.
You see when you talk these things through, they become a little clearer don't they ??
you still didnt answer my question. dbol isnt better because its test baseed and winny is dht based. its better because....ITS BETTER! it signals through the AR DIFFERENT THINGS THAN WINNY AND WHATEVER THOSE THINGS ARE, THEY RESULT IN BETTER GAINS. NOT TO MENTION THE AROMATIZATION WHICH ALSO MAKES IT SUPERIOR.

didnt mean for that to be in caps.

the base of a steroid really doesnt mean anything at all except to let chemists know its molecular structure. certain test based steroids could possess much more "dht" like effects than certain dht based steroids.

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #69 on: April 26, 2009, 01:26:26 PM »
So you do 200mg of D-bol ED.
I will do 200mg (4x50mg amps) ED.

Who is going to gain more 'LBM' ??

I thought you understood 'pharmacokinetics' ??

Growth/noob loves me

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #70 on: April 26, 2009, 01:28:27 PM »
So you do 200mg of D-bol ED.
I will do 200mg (4x50mg amps) ED.

Who is going to gain more 'LBM' ??

I thought you understood 'pharmacokinetics' ??


are you asking which will provide more gains....200mg oral dbol vs 200mg injectable dbol?

what does that have to do with anythign discussed earlier?

pillowtalk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3674
  • Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #71 on: April 26, 2009, 01:37:27 PM »
are you implying that =

dbol is stronger than winstrol because 50 mg of dbol produces gains while 50mg of winstrol doesnt

 is flawed arguiment?

FFS, did you - or did you not, ask the difference between  two compounds ??
You are getting tire-some dude.
Put it to bed, FFS
Growth/noob loves me

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #72 on: April 26, 2009, 01:40:34 PM »
FFS, did you - or did you not, ask the difference between  two compounds ??
i never asked you the difference between two compounds.

i asked you whether or not you thought this argument =

dbol is stronger than winstrol because 50nmg of dbol produces more  gains than 50mg of winstrol.


was valid?

Disco stu said you cant compare strength by comparing mg for mg effectiveness.

bodybuilding25

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 183
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #73 on: April 26, 2009, 02:33:35 PM »
There is a reason why Paul Borresen is dead and its because he had a drug problem.  His Biohazard products were garbage.

At least Trevor's Nuclear Nutrition was high grade

The protein products in the Biohazrd range were top quality, they were manufactured by Cambridge Foods Ltd.

How was Paul Borresen able to afford such companies to manufacture his products using the finest ingredients?

easy, he never paid them, preferring instead to fleece them for about £80,000 worth of stock.

As always Vince, you reveal yourself as quite the cock hungry, ignorant negro.

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: paul borresen steroid secrets revealed
« Reply #74 on: April 26, 2009, 03:31:33 PM »
Looking forward to seeing what you present onstage Vince. I mean that in the best way possible.  :D


What I won't be presenting is a repeat of 2004 or 2006.  I'm beyond that and now I'm going for the win. 

5 years of shit is coming to an end....err at least some of it since trolls will always be around
A