Author Topic: Chick claims he is natural at the 1990 NPC Nationals? (Read 4886 times)

Method101 · « **on:** May 02, 2009, 02:14:30 PM »

Quote from: Chick on May 02, 2009, 10:51:32 AM

Actualy, the only reason I was in the LH class that year, was that I was drug free and tested at the show...so much for your theory

burn2live · « **Reply #1 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:17:44 PM »

Probably just finished a cycle. Looks great though

Deicide · « **Reply #2 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:18:25 PM »

Not natural

gh15 approved

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #3 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:18:38 PM »

LOL Good work. He's a liar like everyone involved in bodybuilding. It's obvious Chick was juicing as a teenager. Everyone was in the 80's. It's what you did. Now that the stigma has changed so has his attitude so he lies. I don't agree with it but I understand it.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:18:58 PM »

It's very possible, He's down 20+ almost 30lbs contest weight. Steroids don't make or break conditioning. They do help you keep muscle while dieting though.

He said he was drug free for this show, not natural. Big difference.

Do you have issues with Bob?

TrueGrit · « **Reply #5 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:20:12 PM »

Sometimes they consider themselves 'natural' or 'drug free' when they haven't used anything for a few weeks. Their definition is...ahem..spurious.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:20:34 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on May 02, 2009, 02:18:38 PM

LOL Good work. He's a liar like everyone involved in bodybuilding. It's obvious Chick was juicing as a teenager. Everyone was in the 80's. It's what you did. Now that the stigma has changed so has his attitude so he lies. I don't agree with it but I understand it.

How's he lying. He said he was not juicing for THIS show, not ever.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #7 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:21:30 PM »

Quote from: Dballn247 on May 02, 2009, 02:18:58 PM

It's very possible, He's down 20+ almost 30lbs contest weight. Steroids don't make or break conditioning. They do help you keep muscle while dieting though.

Do you have issues with Bob?

Nobody said steroids genius we said NATURAL i.e. no drugs no lasix, no clen/T3/ephedrine etc. If you think he was "natural" in that show you're a fool.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #8 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:24:33 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on May 02, 2009, 02:21:30 PM

Nobody said steroids genius we said NATURAL i.e. no drugs no lasix, no clen/T3/ephedrine etc. If you think he was "natural" in that show you're a fool.

hahahahaha.....another internet Chad Nichols. With your extensive experience how could anyone argue with you?

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #9 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:26:35 PM »

Quote from: Dballn247 on May 02, 2009, 02:24:33 PM

hahahahaha.....another internet Chad Nichols. With your extensive experience how could anyone argue with you?

Say what you want but if you think Chick was natural in that show you're a fool. Now go roll your ass into a river

LOL.

Tre · « **Reply #10 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:28:40 PM »

If you're not on anything at the time, then at that moment, you are natural.

And even if you are on something at that moment, you're still natural.

HTH

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #11 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:30:37 PM »

Quote from: Tre on May 02, 2009, 02:28:40 PM

If you're not on anything at the time, then at that moment, you are natural.

And even if you are on something at that moment, you're still natural.

HTH

lol. So that's how they all justify it huh.

Method101 · « **Reply #12 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:31:19 PM »

Quote from: Tre on May 02, 2009, 02:28:40 PM

If you're not on anything at the time, then at that moment, you are natural.

And even if you are on something at that moment, you're still natural.

HTH

hahaha what a fucking idiot.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:32:55 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on May 02, 2009, 02:26:35 PM

Say what you want but if you think Chick was natural in that show you're a fool. Now go roll your ass into a river LOL.

Because you couldn't possibly get in shape for a show without drugs, a person with far better genetic potential couldn't as well? OK I get it now.

240 is Back · « **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:34:50 PM »

89/90/91 is when the pros went crazy with testing.

were the amateurs as test-crazy at that time too? Might have explained a lot of ppl dropping suddenly for that time period from the years before.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #15 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:35:36 PM »

Quote from: Dballn247 on May 02, 2009, 02:32:55 PM

Because you couldn't possibly get in shape for a show without drugs, a person with far better genetic potential couldn't as well? OK I get it no

It has nothing to do with me tough guy. It has to do with the fact that Chick was never natural. He's a liar. No one during the 1990's at the leve of competition was natural, and Chick's genetics were no better than anyone else.

Dballn247 · « **Reply #16 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:37:41 PM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on May 02, 2009, 02:35:36 PM

It has nothing to do with me tough guy. It has to do with the fact that Chick was never natural. He's a liar. No one during the 1990's at the leve of competition was natural, and Chick's genetics were no better than anyone else.

So you're saying that you could accomplish the same things Bob has? Why have we never heard of you?

andreisdaman · « **Reply #17 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:42:22 PM »

I like Chick and I never criticize him......but no way is he natural there...I think he's playing with words there

TrueGrit · « **Reply #18 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:45:39 PM »

How long does someone need to have been off to legitimately call himself 'clean' ? Is there any kind of objective standard, or is just something you decide?

On_Swole · « **Reply #19 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:49:21 PM »

Quote from: Method101 on May 02, 2009, 02:14:30 PM

Chick claims hes natural in this video, bullshit?

No, he claimed that he was "drug-free" in that video, not natural. There's a difference. The poor bastard was down almost 30 lbs, how much more evidence do you need to support his claim?

TrueGrit · « **Reply #20 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:50:26 PM »

Quote from: On_Swole on May 02, 2009, 02:49:21 PM

No, he claimed that he was "drug-free" in that video, not natural. There's a difference. The poor bastard was down almost 30 lbs, how much more evidence do you need to support his claim?

Is there an accepted time frame for what constitutes 'drug free' , or is it just when none is in your system?

Dballn247 · « **Reply #21 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:50:54 PM »

Only Bob knows his status at that time for sure. I like how everyone swears they have the "inside scoop." As if they were the ones to paint Bob up with Protan and a roller the night before.

Croatch · « **Reply #22 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:53:52 PM »

Damn, 20+ years of juicing. Impressive!

Dballn247 · « **Reply #23 on:** May 02, 2009, 02:56:27 PM »

Quote from: Croatch on May 02, 2009, 02:53:52 PM

Damn, 20+ years of juicing. Impressive!

Perhaps we'll see Crotch up on stage showing em how it's done? Possibly after the fight with Pacqiuo?

On_Swole · « **Reply #24 on:** May 02, 2009, 03:11:06 PM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on May 02, 2009, 02:50:26 PM

Is there an accepted time frame for what constitutes 'drug free' , or is it just when none is in your system?

My opinion is that once there's nothing in your system, you're "free". It is laughable to hear someone say that they're "off of everything" when the last shot of their cycle was a week ago.

Certain organizations require contestants to be clean for one year or more before allowing them to compete. Others simply require that you pass a test. Like everything else, it's subjective.