Author Topic: Who is winning here? Jonny Arntsen (Read 10217 times)

BayGBM · « **Reply #25 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:28:11 PM »

Jonny Arntsen vs. Steve Namat... who is winning?

io856 · « **Reply #26 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:34:51 PM »

the third guy by a country mile

QuakerOats · « **Reply #27 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:36:59 PM »

Steve by a country mile, not even close.

BayGBM · « **Reply #28 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:37:52 PM »

Kwon · « **Reply #29 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:42:30 PM »

The shorter dude clearly has a cool physique, looking like a ball of pure muscle, but Steve Namat wins overall.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #30 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:43:45 PM »

looks like Bay is doing the 'ol "pick and choose" when it comes to pictures and picking weak pics of Steve, someone post that CRAZY shot of Steve's wheels where they look like Platz's.

BayGBM · « **Reply #31 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:46:45 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 12:43:45 PM

looks like Bay is doing the 'ol "pick and choose" when it comes to pictures and picking weak pics of Steve, someone post that CRAZY shot of Steve's wheels where they look like Platz's.

Pick and choose similar poses? Yep, I did. Arntsen legs look better to me (and better conditioned overall) though I think Steve looks better from the waist up.

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #32 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:47:22 PM »

Baygay

I believe you are either blind , delusional or both to even compare

you are comparing a flat chested bitch titted dreAM tanned awkward midget to one of the most proportioned symetrical and aesthetic physiques to hit the IFF in over a decade

Schmoe Buster · « **Reply #33 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:48:04 PM »

both got gyno

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #34 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:52:05 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on May 13, 2009, 12:46:45 PM

Pick and choose similar poses? Yep, I did. Arntsen legs look better to me (and better conditioned overall) though I think Steve looks better from the waist up.

SOLID EVIDENCE THAT BAYGHEY MALE IS ON CRACK

io856 · « **Reply #35 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:53:32 PM »

the bald midget has nothing on Steve Namat

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #36 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:55:48 PM »

baygaymale

let me exemplify why i THINK YOU MUST BE EITHER JOKING OR JUST CRAZY

Steve Namat · « **Reply #37 on:** May 13, 2009, 05:50:27 PM »

OK, I'll wait for this guy at the Jacksonville Pro and at the Tampa Pro in August. I hope that he'll give me some lessons onstage.

Anyway he'll need a pro card...and won't need a CD...

BayGBM · « **Reply #38 on:** May 13, 2009, 05:53:22 PM »

Quote from: sevastase on May 13, 2009, 12:47:22 PM

Baygay

I believe you are either blind , delusional or both to even compare

you are comparing a flat chested bitch titted dreAM tanned awkward midget to one of the most proportioned symetrical and aesthetic physiques to hit the IFF in over a decade

Aren't you the clueless guy who thought #1 was winning in the first pic? Apparently you've been smoking more than cigarettes; come back and lecture me once you find your credibility.

Quote from: sevastase on May 13, 2009, 07:29:57 AM

first on the left

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #39 on:** May 14, 2009, 02:17:50 AM »

I stand by what I said ...

this midget looks just terrible...horrible

you comparing Steve to him is plain ludricous

I have Namat as the top contender in the 202's ...yes even with Henry and Flex ...I just think he is fucking complete

youdef are smoking crack my friend

your gheyness is blinding your judgement

BayGBM · « **Reply #40 on:** May 14, 2009, 06:35:47 AM »

Quote from: sevastase on May 13, 2009, 07:29:57 AM

first on the left

dr.chimps · « **Reply #41 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:10:58 AM »

Gotta agree with Sevastase on this one, Bay. Steve looks pretty complete, while the other guy has glaring flaws - narrow back, lack of flow, poor chest, etc. One is a triumph of genetics over drugs and the other is drugs over genetics.

/guy looks like an angry dwarf, to boot

Deicide · « **Reply #42 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:15:01 AM »

Namat has a horrible haircut....

mass 04 · « **Reply #43 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:19:36 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 14, 2009, 07:15:01 AM

Namat has a horrible haircut....

he is a hair don.

ironneck · « **Reply #44 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:21:55 AM »

he must be 140cm....

BayGBM · « **Reply #45 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:22:44 AM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on May 14, 2009, 07:10:58 AM

Gotta agree with Sevastase on this one, Bay. Steve looks pretty complete, while the other guy has glaring flaws - narrow back, lack of flow, poor chest, etc. One is a triumph of genetics over drugs and the other is drugs over genetics.

/guy looks like an angry dwarf, to boot

He still has better legs. I alway said Steve looks better from the waist up.

ironneck · « **Reply #46 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:25:13 AM »

lol of course steve namat is better

lovemonkey · « **Reply #47 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:25:41 AM »

Quote from: BayGBM on May 13, 2009, 12:13:50 PM

You think you could take him?

Dude closing in on 10k posts, how does it feel?

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #48 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:31:01 AM »

Quote from: BayGBM on May 14, 2009, 07:22:44 AM

He still has better legs. I alway said Steve looks better from the waist up.

RZA · « **Reply #49 on:** May 14, 2009, 07:42:19 AM »

On the first pic, the first guy on the right has a better back by a coutnry mile. He looks ok from the side, thanks to good tris and good legs. But his upper front body is terrible, just shit. Namat has a way better physique overall. they're not in the same league, sorry Bay.

Author Topic: Who is winning here? Jonny Arntsen (Read 10217 times)

io856

io856