« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....  (Read 6876 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83601
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #50 on: May 15, 2009, 05:11:44 PM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on May 15, 2009, 04:48:32 PM
Lou looked best in 1982, while filming Hercules. He stated that he was in Mr. Olympia condition at that point and based on the pics from Muscle and Fitness from that time (1982-1983), where he weighed between 262-271 and was HUGE and CUT to shreds, I would tend to agree.
;)
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83601
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #51 on: May 15, 2009, 05:12:50 PM »
 :o
Logged

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #52 on: May 15, 2009, 05:18:18 PM »


(Caption)


Guy: Your my hero because of all you did. It inspired me to do something with my life after the heavy drug use. I loved how you and Arnold.............(Interrupted by Lou)

Lou: Yeah yeah are you going to buy a picture or what.
Logged

CARTEL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
  • Have a good time, all the time.
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #53 on: May 15, 2009, 05:20:50 PM »
Quote from: CastIron on May 15, 2009, 05:18:18 PM


(Caption)


Guy: Your my hero because of all you did. It inspired me to do something with my life after the heavy drug use. I loved how you and Arnold.............(Interrupted by Lou)

Lou: Yeah yeah aw you goin' to baw a picha o' wha'

fixed
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #54 on: May 15, 2009, 08:39:07 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 15, 2009, 05:12:50 PM
:o

Great pic ND. IF I recall correctly, Lou was featured in the September-November 1982 issue (can't recall which one), as well as early 1983 (January-March). Looked light years better than he did from 1973-1975 imo and MUCH better than he did in the late 70.

If anyone wants to see just how large he got in the early 1990's, watch the movie Cage II. He must have been an easy 330 pounds!!

Anyways, here are some cool pics of Lou from 1973, 1982 and later...
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #55 on: May 15, 2009, 08:46:20 PM »
Some more GREAT pics of Lou:
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #56 on: May 15, 2009, 08:53:49 PM »
More
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #57 on: May 15, 2009, 08:57:00 PM »
If only Jay Cutler looked anything like a bodybuilder the way Lou did, with garden hose thick veins in his biceps and visible triceps, with shredded pecs and sick traps.  :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\
Logged

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #58 on: May 16, 2009, 09:32:17 AM »
Lou Ferrigno is the muscle...  mind blowing physique
Logged

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #59 on: May 16, 2009, 09:33:35 AM »
HUGE !!
Logged

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #60 on: May 16, 2009, 09:35:24 AM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on May 15, 2009, 08:57:00 PM
If only Jay Cutler looked anything like a bodybuilder the way Lou did, with garden hose thick veins in his biceps and visible triceps, with shredded pecs and sick traps.  :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

Comparing a fridge look alike with one of bb greats??



Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #61 on: May 16, 2009, 02:58:09 PM »
Quote from: hipolito mejia on May 16, 2009, 09:33:35 AM
HUGE !!

 :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o That HAS to be the largest I have EVER seen him. Looks to be about 345-350 pounds right there.
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #62 on: May 16, 2009, 04:41:38 PM »
Yes but an asshole charges kids $20 for autographs..come on
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Did Lou place for poorly in the 90's BECAUSE.....
« Reply #63 on: May 16, 2009, 04:55:11 PM »
Quote from: Van_Bilderass on May 14, 2009, 04:33:05 AM

I don't think Lou broke the 300 barrier on stage.

he may have because of his stature - he was 6'4 or 6'5 I believe..

eg. proportionally Ronnie 2003 for example, was much larger and was 287. but he was 5 or 6 inches shorter..

so i have a feeling Louie probably was over 300 pounds onstage..
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »