Author Topic: Marcus Ruhl then and now (Read 17657 times)

peroni · « **Reply #25 on:** May 22, 2009, 03:48:19 AM »

Quote from: affeman on May 21, 2009, 11:58:29 AM

1999 vs. 2009

I think he looks better now. His hair is a lot better too

Kwon · « **Reply #26 on:** May 22, 2009, 04:39:10 AM »

Ruhl at 26 dwarfed most mortal men.

jwb · « **Reply #27 on:** May 22, 2009, 05:01:50 AM »

I attended the 1998 Night Of Champions.

It was funny at the prejudging because I was looking out for Jay Cutler and that Marko dude from Finland they were hyping.

Markus walked out and I thought he was Marko... he looked awesome - small waist too.

Then Marko and Jay both walked out and they both looked awful.

Was a great show, Ronnie just beat Kevin.

GreatFinn · « **Reply #28 on:** May 22, 2009, 07:26:37 AM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on May 21, 2009, 06:42:27 PM

ALL KINDS of OIL in those delts. It's SO DAMN OBVIOUS.

There is no way in hell to show this kind of cuts with synthol-filled delts. Synthol etc. make you smooth, like those biceps of that other dork. You simple can't use it without losing some details from your muscles, and if you look pictures of Marcus trough his career, there isn't any fast changes in his condition. His delts and biceps has look like that for years.

m8 · « **Reply #29 on:** May 22, 2009, 07:28:34 AM »

Markus is a man with muscles on his body.

Figo · « **Reply #30 on:** May 22, 2009, 10:26:08 AM »

Quote from: GreatFinn on May 22, 2009, 07:26:37 AM

There is no way in hell to show this kind of cuts with synthol-filled delts. Synthol etc. make you smooth, like those biceps of that other dork. You simple can't use it without losing some details from your muscles, and if you look pictures of Marcus trough his career, there isn't any fast changes in his condition. His delts and biceps has look like that for years.

If you read the teachings of gh15 (the bible), you will understand that is not so, pending correct administration of seo's.

Matt C · « **Reply #31 on:** May 22, 2009, 12:21:27 PM »

Quote from: Kwon on May 22, 2009, 04:39:10 AM

Ruhl at 26 dwarfed most mortal men.

He looks 280 in those pictures leading me to believe that he had already gained most of his size by that point. I wonder what his off-season weight was at that point.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #32 on:** May 22, 2009, 05:54:40 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on May 22, 2009, 12:21:27 PM

He looks 280 in those pictures leading me to believe that he had already gained most of his size by that point. I wonder what his off-season weight was at that point.

His bodyweight back then was between 276-282 pounds. His offseason weight was 330 pounds.

honest · « **Reply #33 on:** May 22, 2009, 06:28:57 PM »

hgh and insulin did him more bad than good no doubt.

Matt C · « **Reply #34 on:** May 22, 2009, 07:17:51 PM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on May 22, 2009, 05:54:40 PM

His bodyweight back then was between 276-282 pounds. His offseason weight was 330 pounds.

I asked a friend to guess how old he was in the 1998 picture and he said 48.

G o a t b o y · « **Reply #35 on:** May 22, 2009, 07:25:33 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on May 22, 2009, 07:17:51 PM

I asked a ~~friend~~ fellow member of the Aryan resistance to guess how old he was in the 1998 picture and he said 48.

fixed

jwb · « **Reply #36 on:** May 22, 2009, 08:04:43 PM »

ruhl looked good in 98 but wasn't 280 more like 250 or less...

FreedomFighter · « **Reply #37 on:** May 22, 2009, 08:33:59 PM »

time to say goodbye!

Matt C · « **Reply #38 on:** May 22, 2009, 08:52:30 PM »

Quote from: FreedomFighter on May 22, 2009, 08:33:59 PM

time to say goodbye!

Cancer?

Immortal_Technique · « **Reply #39 on:** May 23, 2009, 02:41:42 AM »

Quote from: GreatFinn on May 22, 2009, 07:26:37 AM

There is no way in hell to show this kind of cuts with synthol-filled delts. Synthol etc. make you smooth, like those biceps of that other dork. You simple can't use it without losing some details from your muscles, and if you look pictures of Marcus trough his career, there isn't any fast changes in his condition. His delts and biceps has look like that for years.

I second this. Delts riddles with detail in that older pic. Also his biceps have always been crazy defined, just his triceps have dissappeared over the years, leaving him with big mismatched stupid looking biceps, which admittedly do look syntholly half the time. I dunno, he seems too hard working to cheat, but that means nothing I suppose. Flex hated training and had a small torso so it's obvious when he's full of oil. Markus clearly lives to train so one would think his stupid looking muscles are real?

Meso_z · « **Reply #40 on:** May 23, 2009, 02:47:54 AM »

Think logically.

If Markus would use synthol, which bodypart would he try to enchance?.................triceps!

Whats the point filling his bis and delts with it?

io856 · « **Reply #41 on:** May 23, 2009, 02:51:21 AM »

Quote from: Meso_z on May 23, 2009, 02:47:54 AM

Think logically.

If Markus would use synthol, which bodypart would he try to enchance?.................triceps!

Whats the point filling his bis and delts with it?

To help his haters reduce his strong points to "synthol"

closeline · « **Reply #42 on:** May 23, 2009, 03:41:40 AM »

Quote from: Meso_z on May 23, 2009, 02:47:54 AM

Think logically.

If Markus would use synthol, which bodypart would he try to enchance?.................triceps!

Whats the point filling his bis and delts with it?

wrong

it s much easier to make a big muscle even bigger with oil than making a small muscle bigger
markus loves it more to have the biggest freakiest biceps in the world even if it hurts his symmetry then having a average triceps matching his good but not extraordinary biceps

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #43 on:** May 23, 2009, 09:53:49 AM »

ive never saw the 'synthol' thing with RUHL.

his delts/bis have looked exactly the same since day one.

they both move naturally and show cuts and definition.

ive never seen a single pic of RUHL where i said 'yep synthol, its obvious'

i think its just his haters trying to tear him down.

affeman · « **Reply #44 on:** May 23, 2009, 10:02:35 AM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on May 23, 2009, 09:53:49 AM

ive never saw the 'synthol' thing with RUHL.

his delts/bis have looked exactly the same since day one.

they both move naturally and show cuts and definition.

ive never seen a single pic of RUHL where i said 'yep synthol, its obvious'

i think its just his haters trying to tear him down.

lax · « **Reply #45 on:** May 23, 2009, 10:07:15 AM »

Quote from: affeman on May 23, 2009, 10:02:35 AM

It will not end well for him

divcom · « **Reply #46 on:** May 23, 2009, 11:09:23 AM »

Quote from: affeman on May 23, 2009, 10:02:35 AM

pic was altered.

i just love these things.

Matt C · « **Reply #47 on:** May 23, 2009, 11:28:27 AM »

Quote from: lax on May 23, 2009, 10:07:15 AM

It will not end well for him

Cancer? Please, speak on this.

affeman · « **Reply #48 on:** May 23, 2009, 11:39:54 AM »

Quote from: divcom on May 23, 2009, 11:09:23 AM

pic was altered. i just love these things.

Yeah, right. MD alters the biceps of their own sponored athletes on their website so that they look syntholized.

http://www.musculardevelopment.com/browse/index.php?mode=browse&id=606&eventcode=1006&page=2

Oh brother, always when you think people just can't get any dumber some fool walks along and disabuses u LOL

EwaBeachBoy · « **Reply #49 on:** May 23, 2009, 11:56:23 AM »

Thats not the original Marcus Ruhl

The "orignal Ruhl and a hernia poking through his stomach

Author Topic: Marcus Ruhl then and now (Read 17657 times)

io856