Author Topic: TERMINATOR: SALVATION  (Read 1222 times)

BIG ACH

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8526
TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« on: May 21, 2009, 09:36:42 PM »

JUST SAW IT!!! AMAZING!!! BEST TERMINATOR EVER!!!

GO SEE IT FOR SURE!!!!

2ND COMING

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
  • Might is right.
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2009, 09:47:44 PM »
thanks!

online stream here i come!

Rich2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
  • Getbig!
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2009, 10:22:37 PM »
REALLY??  BEST EVER???  No way man, there were SO many problems with that film its not even funny. 

- Helena Bonham Carter as "Dr. Exposition" was pretty ridiculous
- Why would a mainframe computer at a factory RUN BY MACHINES need display screens when Marcus (who is a machine) can simply sync up with it?  Oh wait, I know, because the audience has eyeballs and needs to see what the f**k is going on.
- The Arnold cameo was completely tacked on.  And then they melt his face off 5 seconds later.
- The scene after Marcus saves that chick from being raped was the most awkward attempt at human affection ever (..."I'm so cold"...WTF?)
- Kyle Reese was reduced to a plot device, he was barely a character
- That little kid with the 'fro hanging out with Reese was basically pointless
- Sam Worthington constantly felt the need to remind the audience that he's Australian by letting his accent slip
- and a crapload more!

But whatever, Christian bale was pretty good, Sam Worthington was ok, and the machines were the best part.  It was OK, but the "best ever" hardly.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2009, 10:24:34 PM »
Not getting good reviews; ok action but overall quite generic.

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2009, 11:59:50 PM »
Not getting good reviews; ok action but overall quite generic.

  No James Cameron, no Terminator.

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2009, 12:19:46 AM »
REALLY??  BEST EVER???  No way man, there were SO many problems with that film its not even funny. 

- Helena Bonham Carter as "Dr. Exposition" was pretty ridiculous
- Why would a mainframe computer at a factory RUN BY MACHINES need display screens when Marcus (who is a machine) can simply sync up with it?  Oh wait, I know, because the audience has eyeballs and needs to see what the f**k is going on.
- The Arnold cameo was completely tacked on.  And then they melt his face off 5 seconds later.
- The scene after Marcus saves that chick from being raped was the most awkward attempt at human affection ever (..."I'm so cold"...WTF?)
- Kyle Reese was reduced to a plot device, he was barely a character
- That little kid with the 'fro hanging out with Reese was basically pointless
- Sam Worthington constantly felt the need to remind the audience that he's Australian by letting his accent slip
- and a crapload more!

But whatever, Christian bale was pretty good, Sam Worthington was ok, and the machines were the best part.  It was OK, but the "best ever" hardly.

QFT. Okay at best....what a gip!
HAHA, RON.....

ATHEIST

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1624
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2009, 12:22:47 AM »
which was a better movie, star trek or T4?

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2009, 12:23:18 AM »
which was a better movie, star trek or T4?

Star Trek....not even close.

EDIT: For what it's worth....I'm not even Trek fan.
HAHA, RON.....

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2009, 12:25:21 AM »
Something tells me Arnold will have the time for a full role in T5 after this bomb and his current political predicament. :D

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2009, 12:28:17 AM »
I fucked up.....I went against my instinct and gut...I never go watch "BIG" over hyped releases for this very reason. They are almost always a huge letdown.
HAHA, RON.....

Rich2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
  • Getbig!
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2009, 12:28:53 AM »
which was a better movie, star trek or T4?

Star Trek by a long mile

ATHEIST

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1624
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #11 on: May 22, 2009, 05:01:31 AM »
Star Trek....not even close.

EDIT: For what it's worth....I'm not even Trek fan.
Star Trek by a long mile

well i just got back from seeing T4, my gf doessnt want to see Star Trek. T4 was pretty good. i thought the Arnold part seemed a bit forced though, I was under the impression they were going to use his real face somehow, that CGI face looked bad. even the end with the molten looked very fake. why do similar scenes from T2 look so much better and that was 15 years ago? Bale is very intense in that movie, he did a good job. hard to imagine him as the same character from T2.


Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #12 on: May 22, 2009, 05:07:35 AM »
JUST SAW IT!!! AMAZING!!! BEST TERMINATOR EVER!!!

GO SEE IT FOR SURE!!!!

You saw the movie high, didn't you?

NO WAY was it the best Terminator movie! To claim it was better than the first two Terminator movies tells me in fact you were.

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: TERMINATOR: SALVATION
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2009, 05:12:31 AM »
Not getting good reviews; ok action but overall quite generic.

Holy shit! Are we agreeing here, pumpster?!  :o

Although, I will say the action in the beginning and the scene with the Harvester was pretty good.  8)