and learned nothing..
if there is one thing people begin to realize after 'debating' with you is that you have a set of ideas and you will not deviate from them, even if you have been proven wrong time and time again..
eg. you pick which quotes fit your agenda, and if contradictory quotes (along with visuals) show your first quote to be incorrect, you dont care and continue to push it anyway.. 
you are like classic debater comitting fallacy after fallacy- by sweeping contradictory evidence under your dorian-cum-stained-carpet.. 
yeah the set of ideas is called the IFBB judging criteria and why deviate from them? that's how the game is played kid ...still haven't caught on either

you have NOT ever proven me wrong not once keep typing it's all you have , let's say you did prove me wrong YOU would not be in another Yates thread trying to prove Ronnie is better
I post the quotes that prove what I've been saying all along , I claimed Yates was better conditioned out of the two and you denied , denied and denied , I posted quotes from Yates and McGough saying as much , proving I was right all along and how did you counter? denial as usual , so me ONE single quote that contradicts this statement YOU CAN'T DO IT and never could , I claimed Yates had better balance & proportion than Ronnie and I backed that up as well , where are quote to the contrary ? NO WHERE
You're not a debater under any circumstances because you don't even know how contests are judged , how the fuck can you even attempt to debate when you don't know the rules? you're the moron who claimed Yates lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler LMAO there is no debate just me correcting your nonsense