Author Topic: Dorian Yates - New pics, new thread (Read 147581 times)

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #525 on:** June 05, 2009, 03:22:52 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 05, 2009, 01:32:13 PM

Can you imagine the female version of this with rocketdweeb here lol

I was told you started a thread a while ago where you posted pictures of me (including that shot) and tried to say it was you. Thanks once again for proving how much I got to you today.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #526 on:** June 05, 2009, 03:29:14 PM »

Is it just me or does Coleman look quite womanly here? No, he's not wearing his Moses wig, but I guess it's the way he has his trunks pulled in the crack like he is readying them for Pumpster to sniff after the show. No doubt Hulky & Pumpy have spent many happy hours together counting the number of glute striations in this particular wank shot.

Hulkster · « **Reply #527 on:** June 05, 2009, 03:46:57 PM »

do you work for a flower shop like ND?

perhaps thats why you think ronnie looks 'womanly'

Royal Lion · « **Reply #528 on:** June 05, 2009, 04:38:11 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 05, 2009, 01:43:03 PM

shawn killing in the front shot too.

1000x better quads, pefect vacuum, two good arms.

not even close.

as a steve revees lover ND, you should realize that shawn is killing in this pose..

Hulkster your hate for Dorian is becoming more apparent. Shawn isn't even close to him even in the fdb pose. Yes, the vacuum is impressive, but Dorian is dwarfing him there just like here.

Rocketswitch has provided further proof of Yates's dominance and you are clearly melting down with your desperate posts.

Emmortal · « **Reply #529 on:** June 05, 2009, 04:45:45 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 05, 2009, 01:34:27 PM

You have no credibility given dozens upon dozens of frontal shots in which he gets pummeled. He wins only from the back, and no one cares or rates a BB primarily from the back lol

So there are at least 24 different front poses in which Doz gets pummeled in.

I'll be generous and only ask for 10.

Lastly, anyone saying the O isn't judged primarily from the back is off their delusional rocker. The O has almost always been judged as back being the most important.

Hulkster · « **Reply #530 on:** June 05, 2009, 04:51:14 PM »

Quote from: Royal Lion on June 05, 2009, 04:38:11 PM

Hulkster your hate for Dorian is becoming more apparent. Shawn isn't even close to him even in the fdb pose. Yes, the vacuum is impressive, but Dorian is dwarfing him there just like here.

Rocketswitch has provided further proof of Yates's dominance and you are clearly melting down with your desperate posts.

its not hate. its called lack of quality.

look at the shots you posted:

shawn has far better quads, better arms, better delts, just as much back detail, better glutes/hams, better chest detail in the lat shot etc.

you focus on dorian's physical size while ignoring the massive quality deficiencies, of which shawn exploits..

the only area dorian wins over shawn is width and lat thickness, thats it.

Royal Lion · « **Reply #531 on:** June 05, 2009, 04:56:16 PM »

Dorian was awesome from the front and side too. See the side tricep shots and front lat spreads in this thread. He also holds his own in the fdb desipte the tear. His overhead ab shot is probably the best ever for someone his size.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #532 on:** June 05, 2009, 05:10:53 PM »

Yates looks fucking awesome in all the pics I've posted today but how can Shawn Ray, a 5ft 7" pygmy, be taller than a guy of 5ft 11"

Royal Lion · « **Reply #533 on:** June 05, 2009, 05:33:18 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 05, 2009, 05:10:53 PM

Yates looks fucking awesome in all the pics I've posted today but how can Shawn Ray, a 5ft 7" pygmy, be taller than a guy of 5ft 11"

It's exactly the kind of pic that Hulkster and Pumpster look for to prove their biased bullshit. Just like this one

Hulkster · « **Reply #534 on:** June 05, 2009, 05:36:01 PM »

again, you miss the point.

dorian could appear to be twice as tall in that pic as kevin or dillett becuse of the angle, and the lack of quality of his physique is still there.

no matter what angle of the pic.

smooth detail-less muscles

physical size has little to do with it.

you just dont get it, do you?

here is a lesson, same 'sized' pics.

the lack of quality of dorian that shawn exploits (and so do many others) is there:

you can't hide from it.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #535 on:** June 05, 2009, 05:58:25 PM »

Hulkster the Colemanite is starting to sound like the number 1 bitterite on getbig.

Relentless · « **Reply #536 on:** June 05, 2009, 07:38:39 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 05, 2009, 05:58:25 PM

Hulkster the Colemanite is starting to sound like the number 1 bitterite on getbig.

Quotes like the one above disqualify you from being a respected poster. "Colemanite?" "Bitterite?"

You're shit bro...just shit.

Danimal77 · « **Reply #537 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:04:43 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 05, 2009, 05:10:53 PM

Yates looks fucking awesome in all the pics I've posted today but how can Shawn Ray, a 5ft 7" pygmy, be taller than a guy of 5ft 11"

Camera angle, as well as being CLOSER to the camera

Danimal77 · « **Reply #538 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:06:22 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 05, 2009, 05:36:01 PM

again, you miss the point.

dorian could appear to be twice as tall in that pic as kevin or dillett becuse of the angle, and the lack of quality of his physique is still there.

no matter what angle of the pic.

smooth detail-less muscles

physical size has little to do with it.

you just dont get it, do you?

here is a lesson, same 'sized' pics.

the lack of quality of dorian that shawn exploits (and so do many others) is there:

you can't hide from it.

WOW, you post of the best pics of Shawn and one of the all-time WORST pic of Dorian and you want UNBIASED people on here to take you seriously?

Hulkster · « **Reply #539 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:12:29 PM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on June 05, 2009, 08:06:22 PM

WOW, you post of the best pics of Shawn and one of the all-time WORST pic of Dorian and you want UNBIASED people on here to take you seriously?

why is it a bad pic of dorian?

it isn't. its a great pic of him fully flexing in an arms clasped mm..

every dorian pic has the same smoothness: even in his best 93 shape.

'bad pics' are just the phrase the nuthuggers use as an excuse for dorian's lack of quality from the front. plain and simple..

"bad" 96 dorian shot vs 'good' 93 shot.

not much differnce is there?

there is a reason for that: its called quality or lack thereof, a trait that shawn had in spades. but he lacked physical stature, the same thing that many feel kept Lee Labrada from winning the title from Haney in 1990

Shockwave · « **Reply #540 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:27:38 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 05, 2009, 05:36:01 PM

again, you miss the point.

dorian could appear to be twice as tall in that pic as kevin or dillett becuse of the angle, and the lack of quality of his physique is still there.

no matter what angle of the pic.

smooth detail-less muscles

physical size has little to do with it.

you just dont get it, do you?

here is a lesson, same 'sized' pics.

the lack of quality of dorian that shawn exploits (and so do many others) is there:

you can't hide from it.

Dorian dwarfed Ray. The small difference in "quality", as you put it, will never make up for the sheer size difference with Ray.
HTH.

Shockwave · « **Reply #541 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:32:39 PM »

Levrone displaying a long torso, high chest, great arms, and small quads. Ray looking amazing IN THIS POSE, but tiny. Turn him around and the size difference is accentuated twice fold, not to mention ZERO difference in "quality".

nycbull · « **Reply #542 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:44:26 PM »

Dorian just has the best shape there...its been said time and time again, he won cause of his flow of muscles from calves to forearms, all very even and proportional,,thats was the key..he looked Ollympian for the time..the classical look was still in vogue...Dorian had it, Dorian won. His very commanding and serious stage prescence didnt hurt him either. He has a very calm and yet powerfull persona on stage...these types of things matter in judging whether it is admitted or not.

pumpster · « **Reply #543 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:56:51 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on June 05, 2009, 03:22:52 PM

I was told you started a thread a while ago where you posted pictures of me (including that shot) and tried to say it was you. Thanks once again for proving how much I got to you today.

Actually this just proves what a tool you are, as you got it backwards genius lol. Do a search and you'll see that others were posting your pic and claiming it was moi ROFL

pumpster · « **Reply #544 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:57:49 PM »

Quote from: Emmortal on June 05, 2009, 04:45:45 PM

So there are at least 24 different front poses in which Doz gets pummeled in.

I'll be generous and only ask for 10..

Catch up on some history on other threads...been there done that.

pumpster · « **Reply #545 on:** June 05, 2009, 08:59:18 PM »

Quote from: nycbull on June 05, 2009, 08:44:26 PM

Dorian just has the best shape there...its been said time and time again, he won cause of his flow of muscles from calves to forearms, all very even and proportional,,thats was the key..he looked Ollympian for the time..the classical look was still in vogue...Dorian had it, Dorian won. His very commanding and serious stage prescence didnt hurt him either. He has a very calm and yet powerfull persona on stage...these types of things matter in judging whether it is admitted or not.

Proportion he was never known for, and even teh clueless ND admits he didn't have aesthetics...come in mars?

Flashing those 17s that are completely outta balance with the barrel torso.

jtsunami · « **Reply #546 on:** June 05, 2009, 09:03:45 PM »

whatever he took it made him age x2, he looks like he is 80 yrs old in the face

Hulkster · « **Reply #547 on:** June 05, 2009, 09:04:54 PM »

Quote

the classical look was still in vogue...Dorian had it, Dorian won

lol mssing one arm for 4 out of 6 wins is not having the classical look

Royal Lion · « **Reply #548 on:** June 05, 2009, 09:08:14 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 05, 2009, 09:04:54 PM

lol mssing one arm for 4 out of 6 wins is not having the classical look

That's right - you just showed how great he really was!

Hulkster · « **Reply #549 on:** June 05, 2009, 09:10:02 PM »

Quote from: Royal Lion on June 05, 2009, 09:08:14 PM

That's right - you just showed how great he really was!

you mean how bad the judging really was..