Author Topic: 1996 German Grand Prix (Read 10736 times)

MethodGNA · « **Reply #25 on:** May 26, 2009, 12:16:07 AM »

yeh that is really something, amazing how a grand prix show in 96' could have better quality and quantity of competitors than any olympia in almost the entire 2000s. it speaks volumes about....well im not really sure what it speaks volumes about.

jr · « **Reply #26 on:** May 26, 2009, 12:32:34 AM »

The 1996 German Grand Prix was amazing, look at the finalists!!

1     Damon Hill      Williams-Renault
2     Jean Alesi      Benetton-Renault
3     Jacques Villeneuve      Williams-Renault
4     Michael Schumacher      Ferrari
5     David Coulthard      McLaren-Mercedes

Meso_z · « **Reply #27 on:** May 26, 2009, 12:33:55 AM »

Quote from: DonkeyKong on May 26, 2009, 12:05:02 AM

What's REALLY insane is that you still can't use the youtube button.

hahaha

jon cole · « **Reply #28 on:** May 26, 2009, 02:13:18 AM »

golden era of bbing, gone forever.

nasser got a weird right shoulder.

Figo · « **Reply #29 on:** May 26, 2009, 02:58:20 AM »

Quote from: jr on May 26, 2009, 12:32:34 AM

The 1996 German Grand Prix was amazing, look at the finalists!!

1     Damon Hill      Williams-Renault
2     Jean Alesi      Benetton-Renault
3     Jacques Villeneuve      Williams-Renault
4     Michael Schumacher      Ferrari
5     David Coulthard      McLaren-Mercedes

3 world champs in that top 4

DK II · « **Reply #30 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:00:33 AM »

Quote from: Figo on May 26, 2009, 02:58:20 AM

3 world champs in that top 4

you're quite the World Champ yourself, Figo!

Figo · « **Reply #31 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:13:58 AM »

Quote from: DonkeyKong on May 26, 2009, 03:00:33 AM

you're quite the World Champ yourself, Figo!

Thank-you, DK.

crownshep · « **Reply #32 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:35:22 AM »

Just look at how great Charles Clairmonte looked,his shape is better than any pro today,and yet he placed 11th.

1 Dorian Yates
2 Nasser El Sonbaty
3 Kevin Levrone
4 Paul Dillett
5 Ronnie Coleman
6 Vince Taylor
7 Chris Cormier
8 Jean Pierre Fux
9 Roland Cziurlock
10 Aaron Baker
11 Charles Clairmonte
12 Lutz Wilke
13 Eusebio Serrano
14 Diego Martinez

Immortal_Technique · « **Reply #33 on:** May 26, 2009, 05:40:37 AM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on May 25, 2009, 07:57:39 PM

Sorry, but this is just INSANE!!!!

&feature=related

From that video I think Kevin looks the best and thickest all over. I was waiting for Ronnie to destroy them from the back, and although he has the best separation he didn't have the beef yet, Levrone has some serious size in that show!

Arkadius · « **Reply #34 on:** May 26, 2009, 08:23:04 AM »

Damn!Nasser looked superhuge at that show!

Dreadlifter · « **Reply #35 on:** May 26, 2009, 10:21:07 AM »

I forgot how good Levrone was when he still had legs.

Damn

I can't think of one sport that's taken as big a step backwards as bb.

Hulkster · « **Reply #36 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:06:06 PM »

its amazing how much size Ronnie put on between 96 and 99

that lat comparison is funny as hell cause its so unusual:

this was the normal sight during Ronnie's peak years:

its quite clear that ronnie's back was so much more massive during his Olympia wins than during the mid 90's..

no wonder he lost to so many people including Dorian. he wasn't close to being himself yet.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #37 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:11:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 26, 2009, 03:06:06 PM

its amazing how much size Ronnie put on between 96 and 99

that lat comparison is funny as hell cause its so unusual:

this was the normal sight during Ronnie's peak years:

its quite clear that ronnie's back was so much more massive during his Olympia wins than during the mid 90's..

no wonder he lost to so many people including Dorian. he wasn't close to being himself yet.

yeah he really added the size lol 255 pounds in 96 and 257 pounds in 1999 lol great logic

Hulkster · « **Reply #38 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:14:18 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2009, 03:11:56 PM

yeah he really added the size lol 255 pounds in 96 and 257 pounds in 1999 lol great logic

LOL you act like the weights are accurate?

are you fucking BLIND?

you cant see the size difference between that 96 vid and any 99 shot/vid? Ronnie's whole upper body is noticably bigger in 99 as are the quads..

LMAO

you truly are brainwashed by the IFBB..

Ronnie was not 255 in 96 no matter what they say - Helen Keller could see that

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #39 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:28:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 26, 2009, 03:14:18 PM

LOL you act like the weights are accurate?

are you fucking BLIND?

you cant see the size difference between that 96 vid and any 99 shot/vid? Ronnie's whole upper body is noticably bigger in 99 as are the quads..

LMAO

you truly are brainwashed by the IFBB..

Ronnie was not 255 in 96 no matter what they say - Helen Keller could see that

Hulkster obviously there is a change but stop being melodramatic it's not like he added 40 pounds he was fuller but he wasn't like 2002 Olympia and 2003

and yeah Ronnie was 250-255 pounds in 1996/1997 spare me the weights are bull shit when you need them to be nonsense and then brag about how much he weighed in 1999 , Dorian was 257 pounds in 1993 and 255 pounds in 1996 , he was much fuller in 93 but he wasn't leaps & bounds bigger

Hulkster · « **Reply #40 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:32:18 PM »

LOL even reviews of the DVD comment how "ronnie was nowhere near as big" back then

its pretty clear to all blind folks, but ND goes strictly by inflated and incorrect weight 'numbers'

how sad to be that blindly ignorant.. $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #41 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:35:10 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 26, 2009, 03:32:18 PM

LOL even reviews of the DVD comment how "ronnie was nowhere near as big" back then

its pretty clear to all blind folks, but ND goes strictly by inflated and incorrect weight 'numbers'

how sad to be that blindly ignorant.. $:-\$

Obviously he wasn't as big as he was now moron he was 50 pounds lighter , and 1999 isn't now FYI

and again the numbers are inflated when you need them to be

typical hypocritical Hulkster

1999/1997 forget the weight what looks better?

Danimal77 · « **Reply #42 on:** May 26, 2009, 03:57:34 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2009, 03:35:10 PM

Obviously he wasn't as big as he was now moron he was 50 pounds lighter , and 1999 isn't now FYI

and again the numbers are inflated when you need them to be typical hypocritical Hulkster

1999/1997 forget the weight what looks better?

Ronnie was 250 even in 1996/1997, up from 230-235 in 1995.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #43 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:29:23 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 26, 2009, 03:28:56 PM

Hulkster obviously there is a change but stop being melodramatic it's not like he added 40 pounds he was fuller but he wasn't like 2002 Olympia and 2003

and yeah Ronnie was 250-255 pounds in 1996/1997 spare me the weights are bull shit when you need them to be nonsense and then brag about how much he weighed in 1999 , Dorian was 257 pounds in 1993 and 255 pounds in 1996 , he was much fuller in 93 but he wasn't leaps & bounds bigger

Ronnie was 260 lbs at the 1996 Canada Pro Cup. He was as good there as if he was at the 1999 Olympia. The evidence for this? He beat Wheeler who was at one of his best shapes ever.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Matt C · « **Reply #44 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:35:14 PM »

Personally I think Ronnie's physique was superior to Dorian's.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #45 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:35:50 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on May 26, 2009, 04:29:23 PM

Ronnie was 260 lbs at the 1996 Canada Pro Cup. He was as good there as if he was at the 1999 Olympia. The evidence for this? He beat Wheeler who was at one of his best shapes ever.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster · « **Reply #46 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:40:16 PM »

thanks for proving my point about inflated numbers.

only a complete moron would believe that Ronnie was 260 pounds in 1996 considering he was noticably and substantially smaller than his 1999 win at 257 pounds.

thanks.

Hulkster · « **Reply #47 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:42:17 PM »

you think Ronnie was 3 pounds LIGHTER in 1999 despite arms, chest quads, entire upper body noticably bigger?

LMAO

are you morons for real?

the numbers don't make sense - because they are inaccurate.

Hulkster · « **Reply #48 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:47:13 PM »

Quote

1999/1997 forget the weight what looks better?

1999:

Hulkster · « **Reply #49 on:** May 26, 2009, 04:51:56 PM »

to further prove the obvious inaccuracies, Ronnie was listed as 263 pounds at the 2000 olympia and he absolutely DWARFS his 1996 pro cup size, and yet the numbers say only a 3 pound difference LOL

can't weasle your way out of this stuff nuthuggers