Author Topic: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...  (Read 25763 times)

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« on: May 28, 2009, 03:57:41 AM »
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2009, 04:05:42 AM »
since zI don't know how
someone post youtube '1973 Mr. universe'...with Lou, Mike and Ken

ANY three of these guys would have wiped the floor with your precious A...and tghis was 7 yeears PRIOR

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2009, 04:30:50 AM »
and what was that gross, greasy hair of his
was that a german thuing?

yumpin yiminy yunior!

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2009, 04:39:31 AM »
impossible!!

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2009, 04:50:46 AM »
Mods delete this thread immediately.

It's been proven Arnold was the clear winner with Dickerson close second.





Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2009, 04:51:54 AM »
blah blah blah blah blah - stop living in the past

eddiebubble

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2009, 04:55:51 AM »
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

Calf implants, fake muscles from a bottle (which he no longer has) a toupee, a fake plastic face yet this awful wooden actor with the silly monotone voice is stinking rich.  ???

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2009, 05:29:40 AM »
Mods delete this thread immediately.


hahaha  ;D

The.Giant

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1837
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2009, 05:39:58 AM »
If you want to argue every questionable competition result I suggest you hang yourself with a rusty chain because you are in for a long and unfulfilled life.
It's Hip to be Square!

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2009, 05:44:01 AM »
If you want to argue every questionable competition result I suggest you hang yourself with a rusty chain because you are in for a long and unfulfilled life.

already uin a wheelchair, Mahatma

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2009, 05:44:19 AM »
Mods delete this thread immediately.

It's been proven Arnold was the clear winner with Dickerson close second.






Exactly! Amen to that. Nice try, Ex-lax  ;D

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2009, 05:45:04 AM »
i wish i looked that bad.

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2009, 05:45:47 AM »
If you want to argue every questionable competition result I suggest you hang yourself with a rusty chain because you are in for a long and unfulfilled life.

LMAO!  

What can one say...Ex-lax can't let it go.  :D

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2009, 05:49:09 AM »
haha i still cant get over that gay story about mike katz beefy once told here.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2009, 06:15:33 AM »
LMAO!  

What can one say...Ex-lax can't let it go.  :D

but you are forever gay

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2009, 06:16:12 AM »

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2009, 06:16:30 AM »
forever gayyy, i want to be forever gayyyy..

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32180
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2009, 06:43:11 AM »
AS DOWNSIZED as he was there from his best ,he is still in most shots schooling mentzer.which proves if it was 73/75 mentzer would be wiping the sweat of arnolds brow.

Tombo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2009, 06:44:13 AM »


1. she's a dud root and been told so
2. she's been told shes a golddigger
3. she's never been loved
4. daddy issues LOLOLOLOL

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2009, 07:34:09 AM »
AS DOWNSIZED as he was there from his best ,he is still in most shots schooling mentzer.which proves if it was 73/75 mentzer would be wiping the sweat of arnolds brow.

you see
but you don't see
A would have had a hard time beating wheelchair bb's with those 'wheels'

You gotta admit this

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2009, 07:40:52 AM »
I hate the State.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32180
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2009, 07:43:02 AM »
you see
but you don't see
A would have had a hard time beating wheelchair bb's with those 'wheels'

You gotta admit this
100 PCT NO LEGS...

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2009, 09:45:45 AM »
but you are forever gay

OMG! That was so funny!  ::)


TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2009, 10:06:54 AM »
No one had legs back then. Nor the drugs they have today. Or training methods, nutrition. Nobody cared about legs,  GTFO
 

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2009, 11:03:41 AM »






.....





As Arnold would say: Say hello to your mother lax.