« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...  (Read 25758 times)

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2009, 11:09:41 AM »
Uncle Rico syndrome.
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2009, 11:11:31 AM »
Quote from: Matt C on May 28, 2009, 11:09:41 AM
Uncle Rico syndrome.

Tell us about your plans for the lesser races?
Logged
I hate the State.

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2009, 11:14:35 AM »
Logged

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2009, 11:20:41 AM »
I think the problem with Arnold's 1980 showing was that he wasn't at his best.  People think he should have lost because they compare him to his best showings, not necessarily the other competitors in that particular show.  Even at say 80% Arnold was clearly the best at the 1980 Mr. O.
Logged

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #29 on: May 28, 2009, 11:24:38 AM »
Quote from: Royal Lion on May 28, 2009, 11:20:41 AM
I think the problem with Arnold's 1980 showing was that he wasn't at his best.  People think he should have lost because they compare him to his best showings, not necessarily the other competitors in that particular show.  Even at say 80% Arnold was clearly the best at the 1980 Mr. O.

......bullshit.






Logged

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #30 on: May 28, 2009, 11:27:15 AM »
Logged

rccs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3085
  • Alma Matter!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #31 on: May 28, 2009, 11:31:33 AM »
Quote from: lax on May 28, 2009, 03:57:41 AM
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

You don't know what you are talking about!
Logged
S

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #32 on: May 28, 2009, 11:33:54 AM »
Quote from: lax on May 28, 2009, 03:57:41 AM
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

This just in....Japan has attacked Pearl Harbor!!
Logged
✝

CastIron

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1738
  • Superman lives!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #33 on: May 28, 2009, 11:36:00 AM »
Arnold needed the 1980 olympia to boost his name for hollywood, rather than being the 1975 Mr Olympia has been turned actor, he wanted a fresh title.

The reigning Mr Olympia or previous champion from 5 years ago.

Sounds better in auditions no doubt.

I say he called in a favour with Mr Weider seeing Arnold made modern bodybuilding what it is.

End of Thread
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #34 on: May 28, 2009, 11:37:44 AM »
Quote from: rccs on May 28, 2009, 11:31:33 AM
You don't know what you are talking about!

Don't mind lax. He never does.  ;D
Logged

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #35 on: May 28, 2009, 11:43:25 AM »
Logged
I hate the State.

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #36 on: May 28, 2009, 12:41:28 PM »
Quote from: Deicide on May 28, 2009, 11:43:25 AM
That's not her...
it is 100% confirmed to be her
Logged

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9372
  • .......
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #37 on: May 28, 2009, 01:03:59 PM »
Arnold at 60% of his best was still good enough to win.
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #38 on: May 28, 2009, 01:14:24 PM »
Quote from: CastIron on May 28, 2009, 11:03:41 AM






.....





As Arnold would say: Say hello to your mother lax.


Arnold's form sucks.
Logged

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9372
  • .......
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #39 on: May 28, 2009, 01:21:21 PM »
He had great conditioning for the 1980 Mr O
look how lean his face is!!!  :o
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #40 on: May 28, 2009, 01:23:06 PM »
didn't arnold do cocaine backstage that year?
Logged

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9372
  • .......
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #41 on: May 28, 2009, 01:41:50 PM »
 :)
Logged

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #42 on: May 28, 2009, 01:51:53 PM »
Quote from: Pollux on May 28, 2009, 11:37:44 AM
Don't mind lax. He never does.  ;D

Its too bad you will never know who I really am

fruity
Logged

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #43 on: May 28, 2009, 01:57:24 PM »
everyone looks small in photos taken from a distance


arnold was a beast, imagine how much he would weigh with a huge gut and huge legs?
Logged

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9372
  • .......
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #44 on: May 28, 2009, 02:12:06 PM »
I think for the 1980 Mr O he knew he wouldn't be able to bring his usual size so focused more on conditioning.
Logged

camelisator

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 436
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #45 on: May 28, 2009, 02:16:21 PM »
Quote from: Stark on May 28, 2009, 04:51:54 AM
blah blah blah blah blah - stop living in the past

Agreed for once.

Stark, how come your started posting from your "BigCypriate" account again?
Logged
G.M.W: King23's Army

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #46 on: May 28, 2009, 03:25:42 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on May 28, 2009, 01:14:24 PM
Arnold's form sucks.

Legs like a tree trunk can't be wrong.  ;)
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #47 on: May 28, 2009, 03:27:42 PM »
Quote from: lax on May 28, 2009, 01:51:53 PM
Its too bad you will never know who I really am

fruity

Like I care, knucklehead.  ::)
Logged

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #48 on: May 28, 2009, 03:29:32 PM »
Quote from: Griffith on May 28, 2009, 01:21:21 PM
He had great conditioning for the 1980 Mr O
look how lean his face is!!!  :o

The second pic you posted is NOT from the '80 Olympia, but the '74 Olympia.
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #49 on: May 28, 2009, 06:22:10 PM »
He won by kissing Joe Weiders ass! ;D Arnolds greatest asset.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »