Author Topic: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...  (Read 25930 times)

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #75 on: July 02, 2009, 05:05:14 AM »
Are you stupid? Why I am something to do with your truth?

So what is the REAL truth enough to swear to your beloved nation called UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

I would not say I am stupid.

I am not a mensa member, either.

I told you the REAL truth. I am LAX and only lax.

Now, please lay down your Phillipino Stick-fighting weapons, skippy

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #76 on: July 02, 2009, 05:08:04 AM »
I would not say I am stupid.

I am not a mensa member, either.

I told you the REAL truth. I am LAX and only lax.

Now, please lay down your Phillipino Stick-fighting weapons, skippy

the guy that knows that he is stupid knows more than the guy who doesn't.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #77 on: July 02, 2009, 05:08:51 AM »
I would not say I am stupid.

I am not a mensa member, either.

I told you the REAL truth. I am LAX and only lax.

Now, please lay down your Phillipino Stick-fighting weapons, skippy
STILL Bypassing.

JUST ANSWER MY QUESTION with YES or NO simply.

Can you swear to your nation(United State OF America) that You are not Mike Dusa?


lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #78 on: July 02, 2009, 05:12:10 AM »
STILL Bypassing.

JUST ANSWER MY QUESTION with YES or NO simply.

Can you swear to your nation(United State OF America) that You are not Mike Dusa?



Yes.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #79 on: July 02, 2009, 05:13:28 AM »
Yes.
OK, I will build a THREAD!!!!!!!!!!! that you LIED to your nation!!!!! Yeah!!!!!!!

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #80 on: July 02, 2009, 05:14:43 AM »
OK, I will build a THREAD!!!!!!!!!!! that you LIED to your nation!!!!! Yeah!!!!!!!

Well

I don't know where you are going
but
wherever it is
you are certainly on your way

takahashi

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #81 on: July 02, 2009, 05:20:04 AM »
Well

I don't know where you are going
but
wherever it is
you are certainly on your way

takahashi
hahahahahahaha!!!
Fake Patriot!! You have betrayed your nation!!!

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #82 on: July 02, 2009, 05:21:46 AM »
hahahahahahaha!!!
Fake Patriot!! You have betrayed your nation!!!

I am glad I am helping you laugh. Laughing is healthy.

Maybe use some of your anger to fuel your lame-ass, Paco inspired so called workouts to start at least looking like you have some INTENSITY in your pathetic, heartless-pantomines that you call exercise

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7300
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #83 on: July 02, 2009, 06:09:03 AM »
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

Did Mentzer say that?

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #84 on: July 02, 2009, 06:24:07 AM »
Did Mentzer say that?

any of the top three from the 73 Universe would smoke the 1980 Arnold
just google from Utube
cool song with it

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #85 on: July 02, 2009, 03:14:29 PM »
 :D

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #86 on: July 02, 2009, 04:22:34 PM »
I'd have Duval, Katz, Corney, and even Waller ahead of him...Tony Emmott, too...just by virtue that they at least TRAINED legs

Pollux

You really hate non-Americans, don't you Moosejay?  ;)

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #87 on: July 02, 2009, 05:04:17 PM »
You really hate non-Americans, don't you Moosejay?  ;)

don't know what he thinks

I am ok with most folks in general

TechnoViking

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4518
  • Too weird to live, too rare to die...----HST
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #88 on: July 02, 2009, 07:04:29 PM »

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #89 on: July 03, 2009, 04:51:14 AM »
any of the top three from the 73 Universe would smoke the 1980 Arnold
just google from Utube
cool song with it
Ken Waller finished dead last(16-th) at the 1980 Mr.Olympia and he was again 16-th in 81.Mike Katz didn't compete in 80,but he was 15-th in 81.

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #90 on: July 03, 2009, 04:53:25 AM »
lax-ative!!!! stop spewing forth shit

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #91 on: July 03, 2009, 05:07:39 AM »
Ken Waller finished dead last(16-th) at the 1980 Mr.Olympia and he was again 16-th in 81.Mike Katz didn't compete in 80,but he was 15-th in 81.

16th-Waller
15th-Jorma Raty
14th-Mike Katz

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #92 on: July 03, 2009, 05:08:15 AM »
lax-ative!!!! stop spewing forth shit

wg
I feel I have lots of goodness to add here!

Tarantula157

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #93 on: July 03, 2009, 05:40:13 AM »
16th-Waller
15th-Jorma Raty
14th-Mike Katz
Well,according to musclememory it's:
14th-Steve Davis
15th-Katz
16th-Waller
17th-Jorma Raty
...It doesn't make any difference actually...

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #94 on: July 03, 2009, 07:14:15 AM »
Well,according to musclememory it's:
14th-Steve Davis
15th-Katz
16th-Waller
17th-Jorma Raty
...It doesn't make any difference actually...

yes
you are right on both counts
the order
and it does not make any difference

challenge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #95 on: July 03, 2009, 08:12:02 AM »
Arnold whipping the stage with the rest of the competitors like usual.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #96 on: July 03, 2009, 08:32:22 AM »
Obvious face lift. Check the stretched back smooth face with the high brow against the ancient neck and hand. He's as fake as Fuck and always has been.

And its worked to his advantage big time.

He's always known what he's doing, and I'm sure he has very few regrets.

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #97 on: July 03, 2009, 10:42:24 AM »
Roger Walker was the guy who got screwed at the 80 O

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #98 on: July 03, 2009, 03:48:00 PM »
Roger Walker was the guy who got screwed at the 80 O

absolutely correct

uberman09

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #99 on: July 03, 2009, 04:00:24 PM »
are you guys really arguing about how some guys in speedos looked like at a bodybuilding contest that took place in 1980 ?  ::)

fuck sake some weirdos on here.