Author Topic: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...  (Read 25667 times)

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #100 on: July 03, 2009, 04:01:32 PM »
please go away

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #101 on: July 03, 2009, 04:16:49 PM »
are you guys really arguing about how some guys in speedos looked like at a bodybuilding contest that took place in 1980 ?  ::)

fuck sake some weirdos on here.

actually the weirdos are the people that hate pro bodybuilding yet continue to post here

what do you have to say about them "freud" ::)

E
E

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #102 on: July 03, 2009, 04:35:27 PM »
actually the weirdos are the people that hate pro bodybuilding yet continue to post here

what do you have to say about them "freud" ::)

E

Levrone sucks.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #103 on: July 03, 2009, 05:31:48 PM »
E

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #104 on: July 03, 2009, 05:36:26 PM »

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #105 on: July 03, 2009, 05:38:03 PM »
E

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #106 on: July 03, 2009, 06:19:03 PM »

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #107 on: July 03, 2009, 10:55:03 PM »
are you guys really arguing about how some guys in speedos looked like at a bodybuilding contest that took place in 1980 ?  ::)

fuck sake some weirdos on here.

Who are you and why should we care about what you have to say newbie.  ::) ::) ::) ::)

Pecs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #108 on: July 03, 2009, 10:58:51 PM »
are you guys really arguing about how some guys in speedos looked like at a bodybuilding contest that took place in 1980 ?  ::)

fuck sake some weirdos on here.

you are posting in a bodybuilding forum, so are you a weirdo??

Antony77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #109 on: July 04, 2009, 05:20:05 AM »
Roger Walker was the guy who got screwed at the 80 O

Roger should have beat Mentzer and Zane who were both given gifts that night (particuarly Zane). But Roger shouldn't have been any higher than second or third really cause Arnold just dwarfed him.




Seriously though how the hell did Zane get third?


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #110 on: July 04, 2009, 06:57:53 AM »
Theres always the story that Arnold did not prepare for the O properly and only trained 4-6 weeks.

He'd been training for Conan for a year, decided to do the O the year before (79) already, when he interviewed Zane (and Zane told him the only win more satisfying than his 3rd Mr O win, was beating Arnold in 68!).

He started prepping for the 80 O then, and telling people he was training for Conan and doing the Olympia judging. Rocked up in Australia last moment, obviously the Weiders said no problem, compete.

He knew Conan would only start filming end of 80/early 81 in Spain. He even got George Butler to come out to Australia to do photography and video way ahead of time.

Matterhorn

  • Competitors
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 412
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #111 on: July 04, 2009, 07:30:40 AM »

I kind of like this Arnold guy.

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #112 on: July 04, 2009, 07:46:38 AM »
actually the weirdos are the people that hate pro bodybuilding yet continue to post here

what do you have to say about them "freud" ::)

E

LOL!

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #113 on: July 04, 2009, 07:53:24 AM »
Roger should have beat Mentzer and Zane who were both given gifts that night (particuarly Zane). But Roger shouldn't have been any higher than second or third really cause Arnold just dwarfed him.




Seriously though how the hell did Zane get third?



well
'aNtony'

look at arnold zane bdb pose

Zane=legs
Arnold=NO LEGS

no Olympia with no legs

understand?

challenge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #114 on: July 04, 2009, 08:19:06 AM »
well
'aNtony'

look at arnold zane bdb pose

Zane=legs
Arnold=NO LEGS

no Olympia with no legs

understand?

Where's the logic in that? Zane's legs are visible.. Arnold's are hidden behind Roy Callendar's back. Look at the fdb.. arnold's legs > zane's legs

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #115 on: July 04, 2009, 08:21:44 AM »

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #116 on: July 04, 2009, 10:05:10 AM »
Where's the logic in that? Zane's legs are visible.. Arnold's are hidden behind Roy Callendar's back. Look at the fdb.. arnold's legs > zane's legs

herewith
I 'Challenge' you to look
at the pic I was referring to
NOT the one you are looking at
they are displaying TO THE JUDGES their BDP pose
so you and I are looking at their front sides
you can clearly see both Z & A's legs

Zane=great legs
A=legs devoid of definition, nearly completely

It remains to be said that Mr. Olympia does not = 1/2 of a body

case closed

Matterhorn

  • Competitors
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 412
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #117 on: July 04, 2009, 01:38:01 PM »
well
'aNtony'

look at arnold zane bdb pose

Zane=legs
Arnold=NO LEGS

no Olympia with no legs

understand?

bullshit.

no need to tense your quads in a rear lat spread. arnold knows how to pose correctly and economically. surely flexing his hamstrings and calves in this pic: that's what the judges can see...

Antony77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #118 on: July 04, 2009, 02:19:04 PM »
well
'aNtony'

look at arnold zane bdb pose

Zane=legs
Arnold=NO LEGS

no Olympia with no legs

understand?

Even if Arnold had weak legs it doesn't mean that the rest of the guys did, so how did Zane beat them?
Anyway Arnolds legs were twice as big as Zanes, and Zane just looked like crap I'm sorry to say.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #119 on: July 04, 2009, 07:33:01 PM »
bullshit.

no need to tense your quads in a rear lat spread. arnold knows how to pose correctly and economically. surely flexing his hamstrings and calves in this pic: that's what the judges can see...


dear dumbass:

anyone who knows anything about good bb (meaning, hardly any of you here)...knows that when posing and flexing, you start with calves, then thighs, then rest of upper body. EVERYTHING is flexed at all times during prejudging.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #120 on: July 04, 2009, 07:34:12 PM »
Even if Arnold had weak legs it doesn't mean that the rest of the guys did, so how did Zane beat them?
Anyway Arnolds legs were twice as big as Zanes, and Zane just looked like crap I'm sorry to say.

What it means, simply, is the show was fixed for Arnold. He would have been 8-9th place in a fair show

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #121 on: July 04, 2009, 09:08:14 PM »
I like how Arnold destroyed mentzers mind sending him into retirment and spiraling into a life of insanity..At one stage Mentzer ran into a bank naked rambling that Arnold had hired hitmen to kill him hahaha not only did Arnold own everyone onstage he owned there minds also  ;D

The now famous pics of Mike trying to get heavy handed with Arnold and stand over him complaining how he shouldnt be allowed to compete really dont show how Arnold fuked with Mikes head forcing him to lose any chance he (mentzer) had of placing that night..

The quips were exchanged back and forth at that athletes meeting but Arnold left the killer blow till just as Mike was walking on stage when he said.

Quote
Mike why are you even complaining , you have no chance of  winning - your big beer belly will be rolling around on stage

And with that Mentzers ego deflated and looked like a lost child on stage not knowing where to turn hahaha priceless.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #122 on: July 04, 2009, 10:10:22 PM »
I like how Arnold destroyed mentzers mind sending him into retirment and spiraling into a life of insanity..At one stage Mentzer ran into a bank naked rambling that Arnold had hired hitmen to kill him hahaha not only did Arnold own everyone onstage he owned there minds also  ;D

The now famous pics of Mike trying to get heavy handed with Arnold and stand over him complaining how he shouldnt be allowed to compete really dont show how Arnold fuked with Mikes head forcing him to lose any chance he (mentzer) had of placing that night..

The quips were exchanged back and forth at that athletes meeting but Arnold left the killer blow till just as Mike was walking on stage when he said.

And with that Mentzers ego deflated and looked like a lost child on stage not knowing where to turn hahaha priceless.

you have more fables than mother goose

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #123 on: July 04, 2009, 10:15:47 PM »
you have more fables than mother goose
The bank story has been confirmed on here by his friends and george butler relayed the story many times in print about Arnold dismantling Mentzer mentaly back stage..So moose the goose the fables in this case are true storys.

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Arnold was so bad in 80 that...
« Reply #124 on: July 04, 2009, 10:26:15 PM »
The bank story has been confirmed on here by his friends and george butler relayed the story many times in print about Arnold dismantling Mentzer mentaly back stage..So moose the goose the fables in this case are true storys.

not about the shit you conveyed that he said to Mentzer before he went on stage
that is unadulterated bs