Author Topic: holy jesus...new shot of Yates 94 ...best back double bi EVER (Read 6115 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #50 on:** June 06, 2009, 05:00:11 PM »

1997 raping 1999 all over again . 9th place in 1997 lmfao 1999 would be left for dead

seste · « **Reply #51 on:** June 06, 2009, 05:34:30 PM »

I still think Benaziza had better back

Hulkster · « **Reply #52 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:07:00 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 06, 2009, 04:53:30 PM

yawn back to teh topic of back double biceps shots lol here is Ronnie 1997 pwing Ronnie 1999 LMFAO

Ronnie 1999 placed 9th against a Dorian with a torn bicep/tricep and quad , now how well would Ronnie 1999 place against and injury free Dorian at 269 pounds? LMFAO

owned

holy fuck you must have been inhaling too many flower fumes at work today.

ronnie's 99 form CRUSHES his 97 form and would crush dorian just like he crushed Flex, Shawn, Kevin, Nasser et al.:

why are you trying to argue something so incredibly stupid?

oh wait..your Narcissistic Flowerboy

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #53 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:12:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 06, 2009, 06:07:00 PM

holy fuck you must have been inhaling too many flower fumes at work today.

ronnie's 99 form CRUSHES his 97 form and would crush dorian just like he crushed Flex, Shawn, Kevin, Nasser et al.:

why are you trying to argue something so incredibly stupid?

oh wait..your Narcissistic Flowerboy

ha ha ha direct comparison 1997 schooling 1999 in the same pose

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #54 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:14:14 PM »

Delts 20X more detailed and defined e.g harder and dryer , midsection leaps & bounds better , tighter , more defined and flat , 1999 Ronnie's best ever LMFAO not when he's getting owned by 1997

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #55 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:21:01 PM »

A closer shot of the exact same pose and even at his worse he destroys Coleman in this pose

262 pounds , unrivaled balance and proportion , full diamond shaped calves that complement his quads , hard as nails and dry as the dessert

johnny1 · « **Reply #56 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:31:23 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 06, 2009, 06:21:01 PM

A closer shot of the exact same pose and even at his worse he destroys Coleman in this pose

262 pounds , unrivaled balance and proportion , full diamond shaped calves that complement his quads , hard as nails and dry as the dessert

Outstanding balance, propotion, structure, in that shot of Dorian 1994.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #57 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:32:58 PM »

Quote from: johnny1 on June 06, 2009, 06:31:23 PM

Outstanding balance, proportion, structure, in that shot of Dorian 1994.

Great post ! he's massive everywhere not just in a few areas all muscles working in unison

Hulkster · « **Reply #58 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:34:59 PM »

and yet still Ronnie is better:

Hulkster · « **Reply #59 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:35:53 PM »

^

ouch.

dorian does have better calves though.

its the same old story: dorian crushes ronnie below the knees, gets beaten from the knees on up..

Hulkster · « **Reply #60 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:37:54 PM »

notice the quality that ronnie has that dorian lacks:

the ripped glutes and hams
the delineation of all the muscle groups in the arms: all three tri heads, brachialis, etc -dorian's arms show nothing.
the superior arm shape, taper etc.

its not close to the eye that pays attention to detail..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #61 on:** June 06, 2009, 06:43:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 06, 2009, 06:34:59 PM

and yet still Ronnie is better:

And you can do is type he's better when in fact he's not

See Hulkster contests are judged by a set of criterion

is Ronnie Coleman carrying more muscular bulk than Dorian? NO , sorry 262 pounds is more than 247 pounds , Advantage Dorian

is he sporting better muscle balance & proportion? NO sorry Ronnie even at his best still has a short torso , long legs , and long arms in relation to his torso , no calves , his balance is actually good for his structure at this weight however compared to Dorian it's still deficient , Advantage Dorian

Density & dryness? I would be willing to push this because Ronnie 2001 was hard as nails and dry as fuck but see the most prized possession is muscular size and density and 262 dense pounds beats 247

Posing & presentation , in this particular pose it's a push in this area this is one pose Ronnie can pull off

I'm sorry kid using the IFBB judging criteria Dorian wins this pose even at among his worse against Ronnie at his best

this is how it's done

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #62 on:** June 07, 2009, 02:35:08 AM »

Quote from: England_1 on June 05, 2009, 03:00:59 PM

great shot!!.. from where you have got it?.. any links?

affeman · « **Reply #63 on:** June 07, 2009, 02:41:05 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 06, 2009, 06:14:14 PM

Delts 20X more detailed and defined e.g harder and dryer , midsection leaps & bounds better , tighter , more defined and flat , 1999 Ronnie's best ever LMFAO not when he's getting owned by 1997

He looked way better standing alone in 97, true, but he was too small yet. Simply got crushed standing next to a Nasser or Kevin sizewise.

From 98 on he could also hang size-wise with the big boys, tough he had to sacrifice some details, it was the right decision looking at his competition history I'd say.