the thing is, there have been some instances of judging that is so wrong it points to a fix.
eg. dorian 93 was going to be given first in the muscularity round without being compared to his competitors.
what does that say about the judging system? why even bother to have a round if the judges didnt care how dorian compared to his fellow competitors and were going to give him first no matter what he looked like?
now, Im not saying that 93 was a fix or that dorian didnt deserve to win.
but the process used to arrive at the conclusion has to be fair and equitable each time. just because some is good doesn't mean you can throw all the rules out and do whatever you want, as was the case in this instance...