« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Dorian Yates - What a back  (Read 30936 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #75 on: June 13, 2009, 08:44:48 AM »
Even from the back he gets killed when the non-existent arms are raised.

And from the front and sides... :-X

He'd be lucky to place top 5 in the late 90s! Coleman and Wheeler chased him out!
Logged

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #76 on: June 13, 2009, 08:51:17 AM »
I love that pic you post where Dorian is 6 inches shorter and 3/4 the size of Levrone or Dillet.  Further proof of your desperation.
Logged

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #77 on: June 13, 2009, 08:51:54 AM »
why is a dorian back thread ALWAYS a cue for black people to post a ronnie back shot...

ronnie had more volume...so did paul dillet...who cares :-\

o wait...he's black so we r supposed to
Logged
carpe` vaginum!

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #78 on: June 13, 2009, 08:56:54 AM »
Quote
So we're back to the lighting excuse?

they are desperate. its that simple. and their list is only so long, so they keep having to go back up to the top.. ::)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #79 on: June 13, 2009, 08:59:54 AM »
Quote from: ProteinFarts! on June 13, 2009, 08:51:54 AM
why is a dorian back thread ALWAYS a cue for black people to post a ronnie back shot...

ronnie had more volume...so did paul dillet...who cares :-\

o wait...he's black so we r supposed to

wrong. he had more volume AND way better arms, better lower back thickness, better taper, better glutes/hams, virtually equal detail...

you can't focus on one attribute and leave out all the rest

thats not how the sport works..

also,  dont see how race comes it to it.Ronnie could be purple and dorian could be green and all of the above are still 100% true.,.

dorians calves killed  ronnie;s though
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Viking11

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2002
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #80 on: June 13, 2009, 09:20:23 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on June 13, 2009, 08:33:29 AM
Having mediocre arms that in no way balance with the torso far outweighs calves, from ANY angle.

Besides which Coleman's calves were solid in the late 90s and fairly balanced with thighs and rest of physique.
  ummm, we were talking about backs. I only brought up calves because, particularly in back shots, his calves hurt the overall pose, and that's what makes it less impressive. Ronnie? His calves were in NO way proportionate. His thigh/calf imbalance - due, in part, to some of the best thighs ever, was pretty bad. Maybe only Roy Callender had it worse.  Ronnie was great, but calves?- please. As to arms, Dorian only had a problem after he tore the left biceps. In 93, they were huge, NOONE was saying he had underpar arms then. Even afterwards, ever seen his side triceps shot? Probably never been a better one. So really were talking one- injured muscle. Shall we bring up Ronnie the last couple years of his career after HE got injured?  Who looked better after getting hurt? Ronnie or Dorian?
Logged

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #81 on: June 13, 2009, 09:20:47 AM »
Logged

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #82 on: June 13, 2009, 09:26:11 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on June 13, 2009, 08:38:21 AM
Yates was chased out, no way the Columbu of the 90s was getting any more gifts when overmatched LOL
arm positioning is not the same, but you know this.
Logged

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #83 on: June 13, 2009, 09:30:50 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on June 13, 2009, 08:59:54 AM
wrong. he had more volume AND way better arms, better lower back thickness, better taper, better glutes/hams, virtually equal detail...

you can't focus on one attribute and leave out all the rest

thats not how the sport works..

also,  dont see how race comes it to it.Ronnie could be purple and dorian could be green and all of the above are still 100% true.,.

dorians calves killed  ronnie;s though
again, you are posting a day of contest peaked ronnie pic and a 6 week out Yates pic and comparing?
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #84 on: June 13, 2009, 09:34:11 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on June 13, 2009, 08:59:54 AM
wrong. he had more volume AND way better arms, better lower back thickness, better taper, better glutes/hams, virtually equal detail...

you can't focus on one attribute and leave out all the rest

thats not how the sport works..

also,  dont see how race comes it to it.Ronnie could be purple and dorian could be green and all of the above are still 100% true.,.

dorians calves killed  ronnie;s though

I think its safe to say this is the best back double bi of both ronnie and dorian.

Say what you want, but I like Ronnie's pic better.
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #85 on: June 13, 2009, 09:39:31 AM »
Quote from: intenceman on June 13, 2009, 09:20:23 AM
  ummm, we were talking about backs. I only brought up calves because, particularly in back shots, his calves hurt the overall

Uh, if you bring up calves then we're talking everything.


Quote
arm positioning is not the same, but you know this.

Positioning isn't a viable excuse when that same relative size and cuts deficit is seen across multiple pics. ;)
Logged

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #86 on: June 13, 2009, 09:58:10 AM »
Pumpster and Huckster trolling in a Yates thread, hard to believe... ::)
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #87 on: June 13, 2009, 09:59:16 AM »
Quote from: Mr.1derful on June 13, 2009, 09:58:10 AM
Pumpster and Huckster trolling in a Yates thread, hard to believe... ::)

Well ensconed in your mind once again lol
Logged

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #88 on: June 13, 2009, 10:01:10 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on June 13, 2009, 09:59:16 AM
Well ensconed ensconced in your mind once again lol

Try sticking to words you can handle..lol
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #89 on: June 13, 2009, 10:03:23 AM »
Quote from: Mr.1derful on June 13, 2009, 10:01:10 AM
Try sticking to words you can handle..lol

lol this is the clown with a history of internet diahhrea, trying too hard to impress by using 30 words when 10 will do.

In your mind kid. ;D
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79850
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #90 on: June 13, 2009, 10:32:53 AM »
Quote from: pumpster on June 13, 2009, 10:03:23 AM
lol this is the clown with a history of internet diahhrea, trying too hard to impress by using 30 words when 10 will do.

In your mind kid. ;D

I own your mind like Dorian owned Ronnie , you're in yet another Yates thread typing my name  ;)

Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79850
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #91 on: June 13, 2009, 10:41:16 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on June 13, 2009, 08:59:54 AM
wrong. he had more volume AND way better arms, better lower back thickness, better taper, better glutes/hams, virtually equal detail...

you can't focus on one attribute and leave out all the rest

thats not how the sport works..

also,  dont see how race comes it to it.Ronnie could be purple and dorian could be green and all of the above are still 100% true.,.

dorians calves killed  ronnie;s though


He can't possibly have more volume when he's 22 pounds lighter you moron , and his forearms are triceps are most certainly not ' way better ' better lower back thickness? LMAO how does he have better glutes? explain that one homo , both have striated glutes what makes Ronnie's better? no scratch that I don't want to know and hams?  ::) ALL you do is type he's better PROVE they're better and stop trying to accumulate PARTS it's NOT how it works for the billionth time

and irony alert you can't focus on one attribute and leave out all the rest

thats not how the sport works..


it's exactly what YOU just did you hypocrite , you clearly neglected muscular bulk , sorry sport 269 pounds beats 247 pounds in this department , you neglected balance & proportion ( for a reason ) you neglected posing & presentation , you're an ignorant hypocrite and that's a bad combo
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79850
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #92 on: June 13, 2009, 10:45:06 AM »
Quote from: ProteinFarts! on June 13, 2009, 08:51:54 AM
why is a dorian back thread ALWAYS a cue for black people to post a ronnie back shot...

ronnie had more volume...so did paul dillet...who cares :-\

o wait...he's black so we r supposed to

They hate the fact a white guy beat their ebony hero and that's the bottom line , Hulkster already referred to Dorian was the ' blocky white guy ' pumpster already said the Weiders hand picked Yates because he was white , pumpster said Priest was racist because he thinks Dorian would beat Ronnie , I mean the list goes on and on
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #93 on: June 13, 2009, 10:50:07 AM »
Quote from: delta9mda on June 13, 2009, 09:30:50 AM
again, you are posting a day of contest peaked ronnie pic and a 6 week out Yates pic and comparing?

lol those precontest pics of dorian look better than any stage shots ever taken!

 ::)

its in dorian's favor to use shots like that, and he STILL gets killed..

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79850
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #94 on: June 13, 2009, 10:53:35 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on June 13, 2009, 10:50:07 AM
lol those precontest pics of dorian look better than any stage shots ever taken!

 ::)

its in dorian's favor to use shots like that, and he STILL gets killed..



No they don't look better than any onstage and what's funny is Dorian destroyed everyone and he didn't look like that now imagine how far he would be if he did  ;)

the reason Dorian looks better in the precontest is mainly due to his shape which he lost to much of when he dieted down , he can carry more weight and still maintain his density & dryness , something Coleman had a problem doing from 1998-1999  ;)

Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #95 on: June 13, 2009, 10:54:10 AM »
of course I referred to dorian as a blocky white guy.

and if he were purple, I would have said blocky purple guy lol

he is blocky as all hell, plain and simple. has the aesthetics of a construction worker or powerlifter, not the greatest bb champ ever, like Ronnie..

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #96 on: June 13, 2009, 10:54:29 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on June 13, 2009, 08:59:54 AM
wrong. he had more volume AND way better arms, better lower back thickness, better taper, better glutes/hams, virtually equal detail...



think the TOPIC of the thread says its about dorians back...

i usually EXPECT responces from black guys immediately posting ronnies pic..

i'm usually right :-\
Logged
carpe` vaginum!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79850
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #97 on: June 13, 2009, 10:55:20 AM »
Quote from: Mr.1derful on June 13, 2009, 09:58:10 AM
Pumpster and Huckster trolling in a Yates thread, hard to believe... ::)

What else are they gonna do? they were soundly defeated in the Truce Thread now they have to try and exact some sort of revenge
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #98 on: June 13, 2009, 10:56:30 AM »
but I am not black. I am a caucasian canadian.

just because I think ronnie crushes dorian doesn't mean I have to be a black person.

thats the most retarded thing I have ever heard.. ::)

Peter McGough says ronnie's 2001 AC physique is the best he has ever seen onstage, I guess he must be black too LOL

 ::)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates - What a back
« Reply #99 on: June 13, 2009, 10:57:10 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 13, 2009, 10:55:20 AM
What else are they gonna do? they were soundly defeated in the Truce Thread now they have to try and exact some sort of revenge

yeah, the FlowerShop Worker ran away from the truce thread, now he regrets it LOL

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »