Author Topic: Binyamin Netanyahu May Yield To Two-State Solution After Pressure From Obama  (Read 2795 times)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Um Hmph...Like I said before teh foolish Joo thinks america is on it's side. HAHAHAHAH...Here come their destruction militarily, politically, socially, economically and religiously. The so called great BEBE is digressing right on que. IsraHell will be divided in two, western ideologies will bombard Israhell and the government of Israhell will be one of an international nature like the UN, NATO or similar organization. This new goverment will allow the joo to express his "religion" to a degree before terminating it all together. THen will come protests, then will come more oppression...It is just about lights out for the joo.

Binyamin Netanyahu may yield to two-state solution after pressure from Obama

James Hider in Jerusalem

Binyamin Netanyahu is expected to endorse a “two-state solution” in a much-heralded speech this weekend, but he may stall on American demands to freeze Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

Feeling the squeeze between the US Administration, which wants a moratorium on settlement growth and a commitment to a Palestinian state, and his national-religious coalition, which favours neither, the Israeli Prime Minister appears likely to try to steer a middle course.

Israeli newspapers were full of speculation about what Mr Netanyahu — who has so far refused openly to back a Palestinian state alongside Israel — might offer to deflect pressure from Washington. Ehud Barak, his Defence Minister, urged him this week to recognise a Palestinian state, but members of Mr Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party have cautioned him against the move.

Haaretz, the centre-left newspaper, said that the Prime Minister was likely to mention a two-state solution and pledge to adhere to the “road map” — a US-brokered document that calls for an end to Israeli settlement building and a clampdown on militant groups by the Palestinian Authority. The road map was adopted in 2003 but both sides have accused each other of failing to meet their obligations.

While accepting the road map Mr Netanyahu is not thought to be planning to mention an explicit freeze on settlements, as demanded by President Obama in his keynote speech to the Muslim world in Cairo last week.

In conceding to a two-state solution, he may even try to ask the US to relax its demands that all settlement expansions should be stopped — a move that is vehemently opposed by Mr Netanyahu’s national-religious constituency.

Such a compromise would in effect take the peace process back to where it was under the previous centre-left Government of Ehud Olmert, whose resignation amid repeated corruption allegations eventually brought the Israeli Right to power this year. Mr Olmert had pledged to take action against settlements but opponents said that the Jewish communities built on land conquered by Israel in the 1967 war still enjoyed an unprecedented growth spurt while he was in office.

The dilemma faced by Mr Netanyahu will raise uncomfortable memories of his first stint as Prime Minister in the late 1990s, when his fractious right-wing coalition toppled him after he yielded to American pressure to hand over tracts of the West Bank to the control of the Palestinian Authority as part of the now defunct Oslo peace accords.

Analysts noted that Mr Netanyahu appeared to have been taken by surprise by the strength of Mr Obama’s resolve to thwart the growth of settlements.

Members of the ruling coalition, wary of their leader caving in, have cautioned the Prime Minister against giving too much away before negotiations have even resumed. “The US pressure is mainly psychological. One should not forget that the President is not the only one in the United States. There’s the Congress and the Senate, which support Israel,” Miri Regev, a Likud MP, said.

Another powerful member of Mr Netanyahu’s party, Benny Begin, the son of Israel’s first right-wing Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, said that “if the only solution is two states for two peoples, then there is no solution”.

Mr Netanyahu has in the past opposed the creation of an independent Palestinian state, arguing that such an entity would soon fall under the control of the Iranian-backed Hamas, the Islamist movement that rules the Gaza Strip.

C

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4598
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Good Palestine should be a recognized country.  It's been far too long since they had their own homeland.  About time a president stood up for arab rights in this injustice.
Abandon every hope...

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
A 2 state solution would be smart for Israel. It would put the ball completely in Hamas's court to shape up or ship out.

Still, the best solution is to make Gaza part of Egypt and the West Bank part of Jordan.

Big Mark C

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1010
A 2 state solution would be smart for Israel. It would put the ball completely in Hamas's court to shape up or ship out.

Still, the best solution is to make Gaza part of Egypt and the West Bank part of Jordan.

why are you betraying your jewish heritage hersh?   huh nick?    nick hersh?    you there hersh?

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Good Palestine should be a recognized country.  It's been far too long since they had their own homeland.  About time a president stood up for arab rights in this injustice.

Because they've done so much for us right?
L

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Good Palestine should be a recognized country.  It's been far too long since they had their own homeland.  About time a president stood up for arab rights in this injustice.

Good for those magical "Palestinians" where were they pre-1967? And just where was there "homeland"?

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
And how about their muslim brothers? Jordan...Egypt...hmm. They would rather the Palestinians go away.
L

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Good for those magical "Palestinians" where were they pre-1967? And just where was there "homeland"?

There was no state of israel, the region was called PALESTINE (get some history books) before america carved it up and pushed the Palestinians out for the sake of the Joo and caused all of the trouble seen in the region today.
C

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Good for those magical "Palestinians" where were they pre-1967? And just where was there "homeland"?

Thats the point the borders were drawn, but there didn't seem to be a problem when Egypt and Jordan took land it only became a problem when the Isreal took land which they won in battle.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
And how about their muslim brothers? Jordan...Egypt...hmm. They would rather the Palestinians go away.

They would rather the JOO go away
C

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
And who lived there SAMSON...who hmmm...Jews and Arabs. There was no Arab gov, it was controled by the Brits. Sorry raghead u guys lost, deal with it.
L

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
There was no state of israel, the region was called PALESTINE (get some history books) before america carved it up and pushed the Palestinians out for the sake of the Joo and caused all of the trouble seen in the region today.

Ah you need to get some history books it was the British who "carvered" it up. And why was it called Palestine? Well becaus e the Romans used the terms for Hebrews in the area as an insult.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Ah you need to get some history books it was the British who "carvered" it up. And why was it called Palestine? Well becaus e the Romans used the terms for Hebrews in the area as an insult.

Very well said, Kazan.

History and facts bear no resistance to some on here, though.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
If it ain't wiki or some CT bs....they don't want to know.
L

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
They would rather the JOO go away

All the same. The Arabs with all of their oil and wealth still live in squaller, destitution and ignorance. They haven't progress an inch in all these years no matter the resources and money flowing in. The Israeli's, with no oil or natural resources and under the constant threat of invasion and terrorist attacks, have flourished in all spectrum's. The "Palestinians" receive more foreign aid per capita than any other people in the world. Yet they live like animals, unable to sit and actually think about their situation and why its terrible. They have Gaza and the West Bank now, yet nothing improves. Just more money spent on killing Jews and fattening the Swish bank accounts of their brave and noble "leaders". Fucking sad.

Says much about the Arabs that inherit the area...just happy to crawl along on through the dirt getting a check in the mail every month with their share of the oil revenue. Just enough to keep them happy and imprisoned.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Don't u think the Israeli's would love to come to a solution that both parties could deal with. Yet Hamas and Iran and the other supporters or meddlers won't allow it. The IRA laid down their guns and u got peace. Imagine if Hamas was silent for several years and laid down their guns. And while the two aren't completely the same, u can draw similar conclusions.
L

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
All the same. The Arabs with all of their oil and wealth still live in squaller, destitution and ignorance. They haven't progress an inch in all these years no matter the resources and money flowing in. The Israeli's, with no oil or natural resources and under the constant threat of invasion and terrorist attacks, have flourished in all spectrum's. The "Palestinians" receive more foreign aid per capita than any other people in the world. Yet they live like animals, unable to sit and actually think about their situation and why its terrible. They have Gaza and the West Bank now, yet nothing improves. Just more money spent on killing Jews and fattening the Swish bank accounts of their brave and noble "leaders". Fucking sad.

Says much about the Arabs that inherit the area...just happy to crawl along on through the dirt getting a check in the mail every month with their share of the oil revenue. Just enough to keep them happy and imprisoned.

Exactly, why is the world supposed to support a people that have no intention of helping themselves.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
And who lived there SAMSON...who hmmm...Jews and Arabs. There was no Arab gov, it was controled by the Brits. Sorry raghead u guys lost, deal with it.

THe Arabs were ALWAYS there....and yes there was a Arab government until the whites came to destroy and steal. The real reason for entering into the Middle East was OIL!!! and Israhell would be the "PORT" america and England would use to transport the oil out of. That was before oil was discovered EVERYWHERE in the region, then the Persian Gulf and Red Sea became more important. Israel to america was only a doorway into the Middle East and a "weapon" to keep any UPRISINGS from happeing in the region. But that is just about over now...

Remember the Romans came and destroyed the region 2000 years ago and essentially chased the JOO from the region. Even they will tell you they haven't been there in over two thousand years. So how does a people lay claim to a land they were not on for thousands of years? What right do they have to anything at this point? And if you try and use the claim that the land belongs to them, then you better pack your shit becasue I know of a LOT of Native People who want you out of america ASAP.....BECAUSE IT IS THEIR LAND!!!!!
C

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Don't u think the Israeli's would love to come to a solution that both parties could deal with. Yet Hamas and Iran and the other supporters or meddlers won't allow it. The IRA laid down their guns and u got peace. Imagine if Hamas was silent for several years and laid down their guns. And while the two aren't completely the same, u can draw similar conclusions.

Somewhat. But the IRA wanted home rule, it was political in nature. Yes there was hatred of Protestants and the like, but it boiled down to wanting Home Rule and seats in Parliament. They laid down the weapons and the political arms did what they had to do and they achieved it.

But lets be honest about Hamas and Co., they want to kill Jews and what they want is religious and ingrained on them. I truly believe that their own state is in the back of their minds while killing Jews occupies the majority of their empty heads. They teach their own CHILDREN  killing Jews, how to kill Jews, why to kill Jews, the glory of killing Jews and the fake history as to why it's all justified. In UN schools no less. Their aims aren't political, they don't care about a homeland because if they finally got one, their reason for existing would come to and end. Shit, what do they know about infrastucture?Law" Real Education? Finance? Diplomacy? Nation building? That's right, NOTHING. It would be a disaster.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Ur kidding me right...silly raghead.

A mandate of the British Empire, which had inherited it from the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I, where it had been part of a province.

Palestine was not a "country," it was a region controlled by the British Empire. It was run neither by Arabs nor Jews.
And there were both Arabs and Jews there. The UN divided it between them in 1948, then the Arabs attacked the Jews and lost.
L

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Somewhat. But the IRA wanted home rule, it was political in nature. Yes there was hatred of Protestants and the like, but it boiled down to wanting Home Rule and seats in Parliament. They laid down the weapons and the political arms did what they had to do and they achieved it.

But lets be honest about Hamas and Co., they want to kill Jews and what they want is religious and ingrained on them. I truly believe that their own state is in the back of their minds while killing Jews occupies the majority of their empty heads. They teach their own CHILDREN  killing Jews, how to kill Jews, why to kill Jews, the glory of killing Jews and the fake history as to why it's all justified. In UN schools no less. Their aims aren't political, they don't care about a homeland because if they finally got one, their reason for existing would come to and end. Shit, what do they know about infrastucture?Law" Real Education? Finance? Diplomacy? Nation building? That's right, NOTHING. It would be a disaster.


My point was that the hatred was there. The Brits finally began to outright kill IRA members...murdert them. Hamas much like the IRA, have become professional terrorists, not freedom fighters.
L

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Ur kidding me right...silly raghead.

A mandate of the British Empire, which had inherited it from the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I, where it had been part of a province.

Palestine was not a "country," it was a region controlled by the British Empire. It was run neither by Arabs nor Jews.
And there were both Arabs and Jews there. The UN divided it between them in 1948, then the Arabs attacked the Jews and lost.


Right on. The British and French divided it up with the Sykes Picot Agreement. Never a country/nation/bed and breakfast named Palestine. No govt. No army. No Palestinians. This shit is fantasy. The Arabs and Arafat created this whole mess when they created the Palestinian Movt. out of thin air for use as human artillery shells against the Jews.


Quote
My point was that the hatred was there. The Brits finally began to outright kill IRA members...murdert them. Hamas much like the IRA, have become professional terrorists, not freedom fighters.

You're right. Good points. The line between someone/some group you can feel empathy for changes once you cross that line.

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
All the same. The Arabs with all of their oil and wealth still live in squaller, destitution and ignorance. They haven't progress an inch in all these years no matter the resources and money flowing in. The Israeli's, with no oil or natural resources and under the constant threat of invasion and terrorist attacks, have flourished in all spectrum's. The "Palestinians" receive more foreign aid per capita than any other people in the world. Yet they live like animals, unable to sit and actually think about their situation and why its terrible. They have Gaza and the West Bank now, yet nothing improves. Just more money spent on killing Jews and fattening the Swish bank accounts of their brave and noble "leaders". Fucking sad.

Says much about the Arabs that inherit the area...just happy to crawl along on through the dirt getting a check in the mail every month with their share of the oil revenue. Just enough to keep them happy and imprisoned.

American foreign policy and World Bank has kept the Arabs from progressing at all despite selling oil to the whole world. With Israhell spending american taxpayers 33 BILLION dollars, of course they are going to flourish. Not to mention they are another financial tax haven for ill gotten money from corupt joo run american businesses and lets not forget the massive mineral and gold wealth they are stealing from Africa. If it were not for these things and america the joo would be in the same pathetic state as the Arabs.

What foreign aid given to the Palestinians? These people have been under constant bombardment from the joo and have spent way too much time building and re-building their cities. Not to mention dealing with embargoes, resource shortages and strife. Gimmie a break
C

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
I am very sure there was a bed and breakfast. Where do u get these delusional facts G....wow!
L

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
THe Arabs were ALWAYS there....and yes there was a Arab government until the whites came to destroy and steal. The real reason for entering into the Middle East was OIL!!! and Israhell would be the "PORT" america and England would use to transport the oil out of. That was before oil was discovered EVERYWHERE in the region, then the Persian Gulf and Red Sea became more important. Israel to america was only a doorway into the Middle East and a "weapon" to keep any UPRISINGS from happeing in the region. But that is just about over now...

Remember the Romans came and destroyed the region 2000 years ago and essentially chased the JOO from the region. Even they will tell you they haven't been there in over two thousand years. So how does a people lay claim to a land they were not on for thousands of years? What right do they have to anything at this point? And if you try and use the claim that the land belongs to them, then you better pack your shit becasue I know of a LOT of Native People who want you out of america ASAP.....BECAUSE IT IS THEIR LAND!!!!!

So what? If you are not strong enough to keep the land you won't.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ