ND, why do you keep saying ronnie says dorian is better?
show us the quote.
he said dorian 'would win' which is totally different than being better.
winning the contest (when you don't really deserve to) is commonplace in the IFBB, (see, Yates, Dorian Mr. Olympias 94, 96 and 97)
that is NOT the same as being physically better.
the two are mutually exclusive.
ronnie knew the politics of the dorian reign as well as the rest of us did..
hence, his comment.
Oh the old semantics game huh? well playing your game show me the quote where Ronnie says specifically where Dorian would win because of politics , show me where Ronnie says Dorian would only win not because he's better but because it was predetermined , spare me the semantics bullshit and once again you're reduced to SPEAKING FOR HIM
Ronnie had a lot of options on what he could say YOU want him to say it's because of politics and Ronnie knows about politics huh? playing your game 2000/2001/2002 shall I continue?
Here is a prime example of Ronnie commenting on politics
THOUGHTS ON LOSING TO SCHLIERKAMP AT THE 2002 GNC SHOW OF STRENGTH:
It was nothing more than a way to create interest in the sport. No reigning Mr. Olympia had lost a show like this before. The goal was to shake things up, set the stage for a three-way battle [with Cutler and Schlierkamp] at the 2003 Mr. Olympia. There was no way in the world that I should have lost the GNC. Just look at the photos. I was victimized by the system
Ronnie could have said anything he wanted , he decided he lost because of ' politics ' Mr Humble on Jay Cutler beating him
Jay must be smoking crack to think he could ever beat me , he better be reborn with better genetics Being White sure helped Jay win the Olympia He could have said anything , he choose that and now you're reduced to speculating what he meant , if he meant that he's obviously not shy in saying so
DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.
Let me guess he wasn't really saying Dorian was a close friend , or he's very intelligent or a great Mr Olympia , of he has the best side-chest shot and the thickest back he's ever seen LMFAO what he's really meant to say if we Hulkster-and -read-between-the-lines is Dorian was horrible and I have a better back and a better side chest LMFAO
Taken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90. interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.
Jim: What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?
Ronnie: Dorian would have won again.
Jim: You think so?
Ronnie: I know so. Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block. He's a big guy and has a lot going for him. He overcame so many adversities, like his torn biceps, I couldnt see too much else stopping him.
Where is the politics? I see him elaborating on why Dorian would win , he has a big physique ( muscular bulk ) hard ( Density ) he's a big guy with a lot going for him , the fact you're reduced to speaking for Ronnie shows how pathetic you guys are , Ronnie could have said a LOT of things but it doesn't change what he said that he feels Dorian would win if they shared the same stage and that's a fact no matter how fucking bad you hate it
This ended the Truce thread and started the trend you YOU and the other ball-lickers following me around like lost little puppies lol if Ronnie said " yeah I would beat Dorian I'm better " you guys would be shouting all over the place but you don't so cry me a river suckers
I won Ronnie admits he wouldn't beat Dorian ....case closed.