Most of you pro Vick meatballs don't even knows the facts of the case. It's not so much that Vick fought dogs (yes thats a shitty thing to do), it's the fact that he torturned and killed dogs + puppies for pleasure. Anyone who says it's ok to shoot a dog for not winning a dog fight is a retard. How about to strangle or beat a dog to death for refusing to fight? Electrocution? Hanging? How about throwing family pets in the ring with fighting dogs to be mutilated? These are all things Mike Vick is guilty of. I've heard of serial killers who started out the same way. Animal mutilation is not normal!
Wake the fuck up you bunch of ignorant sloths, it's not ok to mutilate and torture Innocent animals for your pleasure. Anyone who thinks this is ok is clearly a knuckle dragging goof with little to no education. Obviously half of you buffoons don't even know the facts of the case....shocking Comparing this case to anything but a case of the same type is like comparing apples to oranges and it's unproductive.
Facts of the case? The guy wasn't found guilty of torturing puppies was he? He was found guilty of fundiing dog fighting... THAT is the fact.
You can say he copped a plea or whatever, but if they had all of that on him, do you think they'd just let it walk? If you do, then they are no better because they had proof he did something and didn't charge him for it.
Now... As far as the rest is concerned... the bottom line is that one is a human life (or rather 2) and the other is a bunch of dogs.
I like dogs... dogs are great... I wouldn't kill them or do any of that shit, but in the end, they are a sub class compared to human beings... That's a fact.
Feigning remorse is bullshit... Stallworth doesn't give a shit or else he wouldn't have DRIVEN DRUNK... He made a conscious effort. If you commit a felony under the influence of alcohol and you murder someone, you can't use the excuse it's because you were drunk. That's a fact.
They are dogs... They ARE lower life forms and you fucking hippies are ridiculous.