I asked you to define your "Natural Selection" parameters since you made the statement "I am the biggest proponent of natural selection when it comes to applying it to capitalism and government".
That statement could easily encompass the permitting of slavery, monopolies, no or few workers rights and allow for coercion, intimidation and violent take overs since it fits perfectly in promoting "natural selection" in capitalism and government to which you are "the biggest proponent" of.
Obviously you are not a 100 percent Capitalist since the above, (which did happen under Capitalism and allowed Capitalism to flourish) you are seemingly against.
No, only an idiot would assume I support slavery. I've gone into enough detail here for a 5 year old to understand.
Slavery, monopolies are not the defining features of capitalism nor parts of the sum, it's just that you seem anti-capitalist, extreme pro-socialist plus it gives you an easy position to debate and come out on top if the other party falls into your straw man argument trap.
Your last sentence makes no sense, these things happened and helped capitalism; they also helped dictatorship and medieval tribalism.
I hate to break it to you, socialism as it stand keeps people down in its current form, the welfare system in the EU has helped keep generations of people welfare at the bottom. Given your "logic"; that is a defining factor of socialism simply because it happened under its reign?