yes nasser's back lacked a lot the same way dorian shoulders and arms lacked!!.. so why should we consider the back muscle more important??.. back as a whole is a big body part but still it's not everything.. as you see in this 96 video nasser's quads, hams, chest, abs, arms were all better and bigger than dorian's while dorian only had a better back!!..
I don't get your delusion with Yates delts

and arms? Dorian's biceps were never great worse when he tore one but his triceps ( parts of the arms

) and forearms are very good , ironically you overlook Nasser's pathetic forearms , like Hulkster you cherry pick while glossing over Nasser's flaws
Back is a huge and complex mucle group without one you're fucked , infranspinatus , teres major & minor , lats upper and lower , traps , spinal erectors these are all muscles and when you only have with and traps you're severly lacking
Another mistake you make like the Hulkster is you keep trying to rack up parts , it doesn't work that way it's poses who has the better pose that what counts , and I already said Nasser clearly has the better front double bicep pose and maybe ( maybe key word ) the ab-thigh , all the other poses Nasser is soundly beaten
Another glarring flaw of Nasser was his conditioning , he was hard from the front and soft from the back sorta like Jay was , his back looked like someone erased it his glutes were never striated he could never get completely hard and dry , please learn how contests are judged before you comit to an opinion otherwise you run the risk of me correcting you which is becoming a habit lately
