Author Topic: DENNIS JAMES 1993  (Read 3683 times)

LMV

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 932
  • Time Out
DENNIS JAMES 1993
« on: August 15, 2009, 04:27:33 AM »

A man with muscles


spinnis

  • Guest
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2009, 04:44:29 AM »
never looked GREAT, just Good

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2009, 04:55:16 AM »
i wish i looked that mediocre.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2009, 05:15:22 AM »
Looks pretty great to me. Tight waist and striated glutes.

His back and legs look better too with the smaller waist and less ridiculous shoulders.

nukkaready

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1014
  • Getbig!
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2009, 05:27:38 AM »
very incomplete... no flow... high & non-existing lats from front... abs suck... all chest.

NotMrAverage

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2168
  • SCHPORT
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2009, 07:02:24 AM »
He looked better overall here. Better to have no abs than an alien gut thats fo su.
MIRAGETROPIN

claymore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2916
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2009, 07:13:22 AM »
He was posing to michael jackson "jam"...i wonder if  ???

LMV

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 932
  • Time Out
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2009, 02:03:13 PM »

Just imagine what this guy could have accomplished if he had turned pro !

challenge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2009, 02:08:56 PM »
He was posing to michael jackson "jam"...i wonder if  ???

yes


he must be a fan ofcourse!

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36438
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2009, 02:12:12 PM »
it would be nice out of all of these bodybuilders if they posted exactly what they did and ate, its sad to think that 110% of them were on some sort of anabolics
A

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2009, 02:13:29 PM »
it would be nice out of all of these bodybuilders if they posted exactly what they did and ate, its sad to think that 110% of them were on some sort of anabolics
The 90's were the last of the true bodybuilders, after that it all became a chemical war 8)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15234
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2009, 02:17:59 PM »
never looked GREAT, just Good

I wish I looked that "just Good"


tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2009, 03:04:20 PM »
The 90's were the last of the true bodybuilders, after that it all became a chemical war 8)
pro bodybuilding has always been all about drugs, not more so now than before, but consistantly the same throughout its history ( starting 1960's)...the only difference now is less steroids and more peptides...but the amount of drug abuse is the same

MethodGNA

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2086
  • Been Real_Been Nice...But it Hasn't Been Real Nice
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2009, 03:14:47 PM »
pro bodybuilding has always been all about drugs, not more so now than before, but consistantly the same throughout its history ( starting 1960's)...the only difference now is less steroids and more peptides...but the amount of drug abuse is the same


exactly.........people who get all wistful about the pumping iron days, dont realize that it was all about steroids back then too, now its about steroids and peptides.

 

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #14 on: August 15, 2009, 03:25:59 PM »
Same as another pros.
When they were ama, they were in good condition.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2009, 03:55:15 PM »
Same as another pros.
When they were ama, they were in good condition.
yes now no conditioning all drugs ;D

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #16 on: August 15, 2009, 03:56:31 PM »
Same as another pros.
When they were ama, they were in good condition.
david henry, fuoad, evan, phil, wolf, tony, hidetada, etc etc... all these guys make huge improvements in conitioning going from amateur to pro

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2009, 04:06:31 PM »
david henry, fuoad, evan, phil, wolf, tony, hidetada, etc etc... all these guys make huge improvements in conitioning going from amateur to pro
Wolf? not.
David Henry was more shredded before.
Phil and Hide are  maybe only guys who are sharper than before.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #18 on: August 15, 2009, 04:08:07 PM »
Wolf? not.
David Henry was more shredded before.
Phil and Hide are  maybe only guys who are sharper than before.
wolf and henry both come in more detailed now than before.

Nasty Nate

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
Re: DENNIS JAMES 1993
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2009, 05:04:03 PM »
never looked GREAT, just Good

dismissed