He's likeable, for sure. I know this has been asked before, but I've never understood the answer. When it comes to rights/freedoms, isn't there logical limitations that should apply? For instance, is really so that a person should have absolute freedom? I say no. Here's why. What if we allowed child molestors to practice their "right", would you agree to them doing so? Of course not. That is just one example of how rights/freedoms should be limited.
I know the argument will be, "yeah, but homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone". True, however, what if the original couple would have been gay? That would have been the end of mankind. For you ones that support homosexuality, that would mean non-existence for you. So, the question isn't is it a right/freedom, but that of, is it logical, reasonbale, good for the overall human race. There are allot of freedoms/rights that people would like to practice, however we all know, in the long run, it wouldn't be the best for humanity. I've got more, but I would like to get your opinion on this, as I'm just like the next freedom/right activist, I want my freedom/rights. Peace!
GC/DEA_AGENT