*Yawn* ND still trying to suggest that the question of who is a better bodybuilder can simply be answered by quantitative factors alone, while ignoring the major qualitative factor that Levrone only beat Nasser when he was not at his best. Your "stats" focus on years when Nasser was still growing (his first five years as a pro) as well as his last few years where he was not even competing seriously anymore.
Using your purely statisitcal method Levrone probably has more wins against Ronnie Coleman than vice versa, so obviously stats alone do not answer the question.
Ronnie Coleman can continue competing until he's 50 or 60 and as his placings drop, would that make him a poorer bodybuilder than if he just chooses to retire now? Of course not.
Similarly, the fact that Nasser continued to compete for several years past his prime does not make him a worse bodybuilder than if he retired after 99 or 2000, yet ND's "statistics" incorrectly suggest this does make him a worse bodybuider.
During his best Nasser got top 3 in 29 of 31 consecutive shows over 4 years (with only two 4th places). He also beat Levrone 11 tinmes during this period (including the 96 Olympia). There's a reason why at the 98 O Flex mag believed it to be a competition between Nasser and Wheeler (Levrone and Ray weren't even considered top contednders).
*Yawn* ND still trying to suggest that the question of who is a better bodybuilder can simply be answered by quantitative factors alone, while ignoring the major qualitative factor that Levrone only beat Nasser when he was not at his best. Your "stats" focus on years when Nasser was still growing (his first five years as a pro) as well as his last few years where he was not even competing seriously anymore.
The question of who is a better bodybuilder has been answered you just don't like the results because as usual your hero doesn't make the cut. You're just gonna have to accept that facts Nasser wasn't as good as you and the other zealots make him out to be
Kevin only beat Nasser when he wasn't at his best? This is Kevin's fault? Nasser didn't show up in great shape and it's Kevin's fault? and that works two ways Bob-o , Nasser only beat Kevin when Kevin was off once again you trying to have it both ways
I posted all the stats that cover both of their entire careers and Kevin outclassed Nasser
Using your purely statisitcal method Levrone probably has more wins against Ronnie Coleman than vice versa, so obviously stats alone do not answer the question.
It's not only wins against each other it's the whole career , wins against each other , wins against others , professional wins , second places , loses , impact everything has to be considered don't just cherry pick one aspect and cry foul
Ronnie Coleman can continue competing until he's 50 or 60 and as his placings drop, would that make him a poorer bodybuilder than if he just chooses to retire now? Of course not.
No and why? he has the most career wins and EIGHT Sandows this sets him apart from everyone and always will
Similarly, the fact that Nasser continued to compete for several years past his prime does not make him a worse bodybuilder than if he retired after 99 or 2000, yet ND's "statistics" incorrectly suggest this does make him a worse bodybuider
It makes him worse because Kevin even at the twilight of his career was still competitive 3rd place in his last contest which shows he was more competitive throughout his entire career and unlike Nasser who had a few good years
During his best Nasser got top 3 in 29 of 31 consecutive shows over 4 years (with only two 4th places). He also beat Levrone 11 tinmes during this period (including the 96 Olympia). There's a reason why at the 98 O Flex mag believed it to be a competition between Nasser and Wheeler (Levrone and Ray weren't even considered top contednders
Oh so you only wanna count the good years
not how it's done . he did NOT beat Levrone 11 times stop typing this out right LIE he did NOT beat Levrone in 1996 he was disqualified for cheating he beat Levrone 10 times and Kevin beat him 25 , Kevin beat him a hell of a lot more than he beat him
And oh you're touting Flex magazine when it suits your purpose but when it doesn't they're flat-out wrong , I see you went to the Hulkster school of hypocrisy . Levrone & Ray were always considered top contenders in 1998 , with the odds on favorites going to Flex ( who was racking up spring show wins ) and Nasser who was the runner-up in 1997 and he blew it , wide open field he had the clear advantage of being the runner-up the previous year and the fan favorite and like the Yankees he choked
Kevin is not only a better bodybuilder than Nasser , he's a much better bodybuilder than Nasser it's not close , not stat wise not physique wise not career wise .
Nasser was a ho-hum bodybuilder that appealed to a base level of fans because he was super massive and not much more , keep trying to create him into something more and good luck because you've failed thus far .
