And Luke..yes..instead of the Gov paying me and me paying into a service as you urself might do with ur job...we get the healthcare "free"as a benefit.
...well then at least we can start from a point of agreement.
That agreement must be that your entire argument is based on a faulty premise.
If the CHILDREN of soldiers are entitled to the benefits of socialised healthcare then any and all arguments your side can muster to defend your children availing of taxpayer funded socialised healthcare can similarly be used to defend an orphans (or the needy) entitlement to such taxpayer funded socialised healthcare.
You get taxpayer funded socialised healthcare because you served in the armed forces and the poor; needy; underprivileged; illegals etc didn't serve... that's fine. But your kids are too young to serve and they have access to your taxpayer funded socialised healthcare... if your kids get it without serving so should everybody elses kids.
Yours is the typical retarded moronic Republican catch-cry of forcing everyone to fend for themselves.
You can't build a society that way.
The Luke