Author Topic: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?  (Read 4051 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« on: September 13, 2009, 12:09:41 PM »
A lot of questions on this one.  Was photo trickery used?  The flags don't lie...



The "9/12 Tea Party" in DC today isn't high on any of our must-watch lists, but it is huge news in the land of the Right Wing. Run by FreedomWorks, who has paid for the whole thing, this rally is getting fluffed by CNN and positively tongue-washed by Fox.

Numbers of the participants vary from "tens of thousands" (New York Times, Washington Post) to "close to a million (ABC News).

But Michelle Malkin is claiming 2 MILLION!

And has the photo to prove it!



This is the lead photo on Malkin's site, where she claims tha the march numbered two million. It's bein widely reproduced all over the Right-Wing blogosphere.

There's a problem, though: the livecam from which this shot was taken shows a flag flying at full mast, not half-mast.

A second problem: this webcam is looking at the traffic on 14th Street. The Teabaggers gathered at Freedom Plaza and marched down Pennsylvania Avenue, not 14th St.

Where and when was this shot taken? What rally was this? Was this actually the Teabaggers March today? Or is Malkin trying to deceive her followers (it wouldn't be the first time, certainly.)

Is there any Kossack in DC who can fill us in on the details of crowd size, rally procession, and the validity of this photo?

Because if Malkin is cheating, she deserves to get a big "FAIL."

UPDATED - Here's the screencapture of the same site at 3:30 EST today:




Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2009, 01:50:33 PM »
  Take everything that that Neocon Aunty Thomasina says with a grain of salt.

  And then confront her about it (one of my favorite YT clips):

 

brooklynbruiser

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1782
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2009, 04:32:17 PM »
She doesn't give a fuck. She repeats what she is told.

And Alex Jones needs an ass-whipping. :)
Almost always, yes.

Eyeball Chambers

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14348
  • Would you hold still? You're making me fuck up...
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2009, 04:41:31 PM »
I think she's hot, man I'd like to fuck her and Hasselbeck...

They could call me a liberal bitch while they raped me ;D


S

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2009, 04:42:50 PM »
malkin = one of the original 911 truthers.  before any of the loose change kids.  She was one of the first, when the idea was VERy unpopular and unpatriotic.

Then, oddly, FOX news hires her an she turns a 180.  hmm.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2009, 08:08:10 PM »
Michelel malkin now admitting the organizer was "in error" when making his 2 million estimate.

The entire report was this guy's tweet.  he grew it from 1 to 1.5 to 2 million in attendance, as his tweets went by.  Really.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2009, 09:04:16 PM »
Michelel malkin now admitting the organizer was "in error" when making his 2 million estimate.

The entire report was this guy's tweet.  he grew it from 1 to 1.5 to 2 million in attendance, as his tweets went by.  Really.
this is the same guy that said abc was the source for the numbers?

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2009, 10:49:31 PM »
Did msnbc use video from another gathering in this story? The video starts at 45 sec.


tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2009, 10:51:55 PM »
Did msnbc use video from another gathering in this story?


THOSE FUKING LIARSSSSSS AAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHH FOX NEWS MUST HAVE GOTTEN TO THEM...

I DEMAND THEY RETRACT THEIR IGNORANT LIES AND IMMEDIATLEY APPOLOGIZE  ;D

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2009, 10:55:51 PM »




Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2009, 10:58:13 PM »
THOSE FUKING LIARSSSSSS AAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHH FOX NEWS MUST HAVE GOTTEN TO THEM...

I DEMAND THEY RETRACT THEIR IGNORANT LIES AND IMMEDIATLEY APPOLOGIZE  ;D

, I just wanna get my hands on some aerial photo's. There's gotta be some around somewhere.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2009, 11:05:59 PM »
, I just wanna get my hands on some aerial photo's. There's gotta be some around somewhere.
I'd love to see that too and compare to the inauguration since the numbers there were given a pretty accurate range.  There's a lot of video taken in the street in that picture/clip you're showing as they're marching down it and they're spaced pretty far apart.  But at the inauguration, it was packed.  I'm guessing around 60,000 in that crowd.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2009, 11:10:33 PM »
I'd love to see that too and compare to the inauguration since the numbers there were given a pretty accurate range.  There's a lot of video taken in the street in that picture/clip you're showing as they're marching down it and they're spaced pretty far apart.  But at the inauguration, it was packed.  I'm guessing around 60,000 in that crowd.

What I'm mainly addressing is that some are saying the photo wasn't even the protest but I just posted a  video from msnbc showing that it was, so now I'm more confused than anything.

I agree that the people are spaced out quite a bit but this video feed from  another camera is almost 2 hours long I think and shows a steady stream of people. If the time is right then it has to be more than 60,000.


tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2009, 11:11:50 PM »
I'd love to see that too and compare to the inauguration since the numbers there were given a pretty accurate range.  There's a lot of video taken in the street in that picture/clip you're showing as they're marching down it and they're spaced pretty far apart.  But at the inauguration, it was packed.  I'm guessing around 60,000 in that crowd.
So what your saying is fox reported it right then?

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #14 on: September 13, 2009, 11:29:18 PM »
So what your saying is fox reported it right then?
nope, that's not the mall dummy. :D

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2009, 11:30:56 PM »
What I'm mainly addressing is that some are saying the photo wasn't even the protest but I just posted a  video from msnbc showing that it was, so now I'm more confused than anything.

I agree that the people are spaced out quite a bit but this video feed from  another camera is almost 2 hours long I think and shows a steady stream of people. If the time is right then it has to be more than 60,000.


same video I posted to show it looks like 60,000 max.  coming and going, yea.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2009, 11:34:26 PM »
same video I posted to show it looks like 60,000 max.  coming and going, yea.

Can you correct me cause in this diagram it suggests 240,000 can be sqeezed in the ticket section but the crowd of people in the video stretches all the way back. Is this diagram from another area? Couldnt you sqeeze all these people on the street into the ticket area?


Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2009, 12:04:41 AM »
If the protest started at Freedom Plaza (F) and stretched out all the way to the Capitol all those people could possibly fill the 240,000 ticket area that's in the diagram. I think it's fair to say, it's not a million, but it's not as low as some are saying either.


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2009, 05:56:12 AM »
this is the same guy that said abc was the source for the numbers?

Both the event organizer and 333386 claimed ABC as the source.

ABC vehemently denies it, and neither the event organizer or 33 can provide any proof ABC ever wrote it.  In this age of website cache, it should be a BREEZE to prove it was on ABC's website.  They haven't done that - yet.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33695
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2009, 06:46:32 AM »
Both the event organizer and 333386 claimed ABC as the source.

ABC vehemently denies it, and neither the event organizer or 33 can provide any proof ABC ever wrote it.  In this age of website cache, it should be a BREEZE to prove it was on ABC's website.  They haven't done that - yet.

That is because they can't.  The only claimed ABC stated it in order to lend it a temporary air of credibility.  Something that would not have happened if they claimed it was from FAUX Noise.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2009, 06:52:25 AM »
48 hours later... sitll not a shred of proof that ABC said 2 million were in the house.

You'd think they would be screaming this from the rooftops.  Instead, they're being quiet.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2009, 07:23:23 AM »
48 hours later... sitll not a shred of proof that ABC said 2 million were in the house.

You'd think they would be screaming this from the rooftops.  Instead, they're being quiet.

Are you still claiming that the photo is fake?

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2009, 07:25:56 AM »
Are you still claiming that the photo is fake?
he also claims that fox news broadcasted the millions number as well not a shred of proof for that either....

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2009, 07:27:07 AM »
Are you still claiming that the photo is fake?

Lets agree the real number is probably between 250k and 1 million. 

Its not 60k thats just partisan dreaming. 

Its not 2 million either.

The pictures dont lie. 

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Is Malkin Selling Phony March Numbers?
« Reply #24 on: September 14, 2009, 07:31:03 AM »
Lets agree the real number is probably between 250k and 1 million.  

Its not 60k thats just partisan dreaming.  

Its not 2 million either.

The pictures dont lie.  


In my opinion judging from the msnbc video and the  length of road they took up I'd say the number is even under 200,000. It's close but probably just a little under that. There is no way in hell it hit 1 million people as much as I'd like to believe it did. 60,000 is ridiculously low and is just a desperate attempt to discredit a respectable turnout..