Author Topic: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'  (Read 531 times)

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« on: September 15, 2009, 08:31:25 AM »
Closing The Book On The 'Bush Legacy'


Sep 11 2009,
Thursday's annual Census Bureau report on income, poverty and access to health care-the Bureau's principal report card on the well-being of average Americans-closes the books on the economic record of George W. Bush.


It's not a record many Republicans are likely to point to with pride.

On every major measurement, the Census Bureau report shows that the country lost ground during Bush's two terms. While Bush was in office, the median household income declined, poverty increased, childhood poverty increased even more, and the number of Americans without health insurance spiked. By contrast, the country's condition improved on each of those measures during Bill Clinton's two terms, often substantially.

The Census' final report card on Bush's record presents an intriguing backdrop to today's economic debate. Bush built his economic strategy around tax cuts, passing large reductions both in 2001 and 2003. Congressional Republicans are insisting that a similar agenda focused on tax cuts offers better prospects of reviving the economy than President Obama's combination of some tax cuts with heavy government spending. But the bleak economic results from Bush's two terms, tarnish, to put it mildly, the idea that tax cuts represent an economic silver bullet.

But few would argue that national economic policy is irrelevant to economic outcomes. And rightly or wrongly, voters still judge presidents and their parties largely by the economy's performance during their watch. In that assessment, few measures do more than the Census data to answer the threshold question of whether a president left the day to day economic conditions of average Americans better than he found it.
If that's the test, today's report shows that Bush flunked on every relevant dimension-and not just because of the severe downturn that began last year.


Consider first the median income. When Bill Clinton left office after 2000, the median income-the income line around which half of households come in above, and half fall below-stood at $52,500 (measured in inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars). When Bush left office after 2008, the median income had fallen to $50,303. That's a decline of 4.2 per cent.

That leaves Bush with the dubious distinction of becoming the only president in recent history to preside over an income decline through two presidential terms, notes Lawrence Mishel, president of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. The median household income increased during the two terms of Clinton (by 14 per cent, as we'll see in more detail below), Ronald Reagan (8.1 per cent), and Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford (3.9 per cent). As Mishel notes, although the global recession decidedly deepened the hole-the percentage decline in the median income from 2007 to 2008 is the largest single year fall on record-average families were already worse off in 2007 than they were in 2000, a remarkable result through an entire business expansion. "What is phenomenal about the years under Bush is that through the entire business cycle from 2000 through 2007, even before this recession...working families were worse off at the end of the recovery, in the best of times during that period, than they were in 2000 before he took office," Mishel says.Bush's record on poverty is equally bleak. When Clinton left office in 2000, the Census counted almost 31.6 million Americans living in poverty. When Bush left office in 2008, the number of poor Americans had jumped to 39.8 million (the largest number in absolute terms since 1960.) Under Bush, the number of people in poverty increased by over 8.2 million, or 26.1 per cent. Over two-thirds of that increase occurred before the economic collapse of 2008.


The trends were comparably daunting for children in poverty. When Clinton left office nearly 11.6 million children lived in poverty, according to the Census. When Bush left office that number had swelled to just under 14.1 million, an increase of more than 21 per cent.

The story is similar again for access to health care. When Clinton left office, the number of uninsured Americans stood at 38.4 million. By the time Bush left office that number had grown to just over 46.3 million, an increase of nearly 8 million or 20.6 per cent.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2009, 08:32:56 AM »
From 2000 thru 2008,

Rich got richer.  Poor got poorer.

This is undeniable.  Obama's making the rich poorer, and the poor richer.  Fair?  Who knows.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2009, 08:36:09 AM »
From 2000 thru 2008,

Rich got richer.  Poor got poorer.

This is undeniable.  Obama's making the rich poorer, and the poor richer.  Fair?  Who knows.

How is he making the "poor richer"?  He may be handing out checks and attempting to redistribute wealth from those that create to those that sit around and get drunk off well-fare checks, but how exactly is he making the poor richer? Are they getting more educated? Learning how to save money and start small businesses? Produce something of value?

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2009, 08:37:05 AM »
From 2000 thru 2008,

Rich got richer.  Poor got poorer.

This is undeniable.  Obama's making the rich poorer, and the poor richer.  Fair?  Who knows.

How is he making the poor richer?By raising unemployment to 9.7%.He has done NOTHING for ANYONE so far.Other then exploding the deficit.

By the way tax cuts work,however if you spend it faster then it comes in any program will fail.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2009, 08:41:35 AM »
He's handing out govt $ to poor people.  he's raising taxes especially harder on the rich, ending bush tax cuts.

When you say, "By the way tax cuts work,"... I have to scratch my head.  Bush used major tax cuts from 00 to 08.  They worked... if your goal was financial collapse in sept 08?

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2009, 09:10:31 AM »
He's handing out govt $ to poor people.  he's raising taxes especially harder on the rich, ending bush tax cuts.

When you say, "By the way tax cuts work,"... I have to scratch my head.  Bush used major tax cuts from 00 to 08.  They worked... if your goal was financial collapse in sept 08?

Ok, but that isn't making anyone richer or more wealthy. In that case, he isn't even handing out other peoples money, he is handing out printed vapor money from the Fed. Even going by wealth redistrubution, Obama is then taking $$ from those that produce the most and use it the best (I know it's relative, but follow me here) to create more wealth, and giving it to those who produce nothing, who won't invest it, who won't use it to create jobs, businesses or anything worth a nickel. It sounds like he is just following more failed policy and making everyone poor.

How did the tax cuts cause the financial collapse? They didn't. Tax revenues went up, I'm not connecting the 2, but it is what happened. I will also say that the increase in tax revenues came from our heavily leveraged bubble economy as well. Lots of causes for the financial collapse, but cutting taxes wasn't one of them.


Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2009, 09:15:07 AM »
i agree about Bush being irresponsible. but now Obama is guilty of the same - however on a smaller scale. Fighting a war without the money to pay for it. why isn't Obama just pulling all the troups?
As empty as paradise

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2009, 09:16:06 AM »
He's handing out govt $ to poor people.  he's raising taxes especially harder on the rich, ending bush tax cuts.

When you say, "By the way tax cuts work,"... I have to scratch my head.  Bush used major tax cuts from 00 to 08.  They worked... if your goal was financial collapse in sept 08?

At what point did the government do anything to make money other than tax it's citizens? Is it really government money?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Closing The Book On 'The Bush Legacy'
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2009, 09:26:14 AM »
i agree about Bush being irresponsible. but now Obama is guilty of the same - however on a smaller scale. Fighting a war without the money to pay for it. why isn't Obama just pulling all the troups?

Now you're asking the real questions. It really is that simple.

Take a look at U.S. presidential/Govt. history. Look at the advisors who surround the Presidents, their history, connections, belief's etc. A lot of old players are still in positions of influence and policy making. A lot of them have prior careers in other integrated war areas. The president may be new and exciting, but his advisors and policy makers etc are all cut from the same cloth.