Author Topic: Glenn Beck Now Claims 1.7 Million Attended 9-12 Protests (Read 4953 times)

blacken700 · « **on:** September 19, 2009, 06:15:59 AM »

Denial State the University that did the study

Here you go a real life research professor and expert on crowd estimation (not a ROTC cadet) says the crowd was about 75,000
Farouk El-Baz, a Boston University research professor and expert on crowd estimation, said his informal research from media coverage indicates 75,000 as the peak number. Peter Piringer, a spokesman for the District of Columbia Fire Department, said he made an unofficial estimate of 60,000 to 70,000 at the beginning of the event.
Since when is it OK to only agree with the president? Is this guy serious? Has he completely blotted the Bush years out of his memory? From 9-11 through most of 2005 if you disagreed with Bush you were an America-hating enabler who supported the terrorists. What a total ass hat. ONLY on the propaganda network could this tool get away with such nonsense.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #1 on:** September 19, 2009, 06:28:35 AM »

well it's official now...

If that's 1.7 million, then I have to ask how many were actually at Obama's inauguration? That crowd dwarfed the 9/12 protest which never once filled the mall. Must have been 5 million at the inauguration huh fox?

240 is Back · « **Reply #2 on:** September 19, 2009, 07:13:02 AM »

No longer can we hear "Hey, FOX never claimed it, just the wingnut organizer of the event!"

75,000 looks about right, and was the estimation of a Boston University research professor.

Beck, of course, believes there were TWENTY times that.

now, imagine if Olbermann went on MSNBC and said there were THIRTY MILLION PEOPLE at the Obama inauguration (the same 20x exaggeration). He'd be mocked for the next ten years.

tonymctones · « **Reply #3 on:** September 19, 2009, 07:30:03 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on September 19, 2009, 07:13:02 AM

No longer can we hear "Hey, FOX never claimed it, just the wingnut organizer of the event!"

75,000 looks about right, and was the estimation of a Boston University research professor.

Beck, of course, believes there were TWENTY times that.

now, imagine if Olbermann went on MSNBC and said there were THIRTY MILLION PEOPLE at the Obama inauguration (the same 20x exaggeration). He'd be mocked for the next ten years.

LOL you guys...

FOX reported 10's of thousands beck who has gone a bit wacko said 1.7 million

240 is Back · « **Reply #4 on:** September 19, 2009, 07:44:32 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 07:30:03 AM

LOL you guys...

FOX reported 10's of thousands beck who has gone a bit wacko said 1.7 million

Beck is on FOX.

he's repeatedly said 1.7 million, and tried to explain how he reached this conclusion.

They endorse his re-telling of this obvious lie by allowing him to keep retelling it.

So by putting Beck on the air to say "1.7 million!" over and over, they're reporting it.

Bindare_Dundat · « **Reply #5 on:** September 19, 2009, 07:54:52 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on September 19, 2009, 06:15:59 AM

Denial State the University that did the study

Here you go a real life research professor and expert on crowd estimation (not a ROTC cadet) says the crowd was about 75,000
Farouk El-Baz, a Boston University research professor and expert on crowd estimation, said his informal research from media coverage indicates 75,000 as the peak number. Peter Piringer, a spokesman for the District of Columbia Fire Department, said he made an unofficial estimate of 60,000 to 70,000 at the beginning of the event.
Since when is it OK to only agree with the president? Is this guy serious? Has he completely blotted the Bush years out of his memory? From 9-11 through most of 2005 if you disagreed with Bush you were an America-hating enabler who supported the terrorists. What a total ass hat. ONLY on the propaganda network could this tool get away with such nonsense.

You're having a hard time letting go of this protest thing huh?

240 is Back · « **Reply #6 on:** September 19, 2009, 07:58:20 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on September 19, 2009, 07:54:52 AM

You're having a hard time letting go of this protest thing huh?

Beck's been bragging 1.7 million nonstop.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #7 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:00:06 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on September 19, 2009, 07:54:52 AM

You're having a hard time letting go of this protest thing huh?

1.7 million? uh yea...

Bindare_Dundat · « **Reply #8 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:04:02 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 08:00:06 AM

1.7 million? uh yea...

Did I ever claim anything close to a million? What's informal research? Who cares? This is getting old fast.

There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.

tonymctones · « **Reply #9 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:04:24 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on September 19, 2009, 07:44:32 AM

Beck is on FOX.

he's repeatedly said 1.7 million, and tried to explain how he reached this conclusion.

They endorse his re-telling of this obvious lie by allowing him to keep retelling it.

So by putting Beck on the air to say "1.7 million!" over and over, they're reporting it.

FOX SHOWS HAVE ALSO SHOWN 10's OF THOUSANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jack ass

beck is his own person and as such allowed to do whatever he wants

you think olbeiman continuing to allow garofallow on his show continuing to allow her to call be racists and even worse says that MSNBC agrees with her b/c they allow her to keep coming on?

fuking idiot

try listening to FOX instead of beck FOX is saying 10's of thousands as the clip clearly states...

240 is Back · « **Reply #10 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:06:42 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 08:04:24 AM

FOX SHOWS HAVE ALSO SHOWN 10's OF THOUSANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They reported it both. Wither further analysis, we know 1.7 is incorrect. yet they allow beck to keep reporting it. on Fox. Your assertion they only say 1.7 "some of the time" is correct.

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 08:04:24 AM

try listening to FOX instead of beck FOX is saying 10's of thousands as the clip clearly states...

So fox radio is telling the truth, but FOX TV news is lying? I can accept that, thank you.

blacken700 · « **Reply #11 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:15:29 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on September 19, 2009, 07:54:52 AM

You're having a hard time letting go of this protest thing huh?

I'm having a hard time with you fuck nuts believing what this moron says without doing a little research yourself. then going out on election year and voting.AS PAT BUCANNAN SAYS THE DUMBING DOWN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #12 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:17:36 AM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on September 19, 2009, 08:04:02 AM

Did I ever claim anything close to a million? What's informal research? Who cares? This is getting old fast.

There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million. There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.There was a million. No, there was 60,000. No there was 200,000, No. there was 2 million.

I didn't say you, I was commenting on "you're having a hard time letting go" I was just pointing out that of course it's going to be talked about when the number is overblown like that. That's what's being talked about here, the number. So I didn't mean to imply you said, I'm just saying why...

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #13 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:22:41 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 08:04:24 AM

FOX SHOWS HAVE ALSO SHOWN 10's OF THOUSANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jack ass

beck is his own person and as such allowed to do whatever he wants

you think olbeiman continuing to allow garofallow on his show continuing to allow her to call be racists and even worse says that MSNBC agrees with her b/c they allow her to keep coming on?

fuking idiot

try listening to FOX instead of beck FOX is saying 10's of thousands as the clip clearly states...

did fox report that it was a sea of people filling the mall? yup...

was it? Nope...

tonymctones · « **Reply #14 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:28:12 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 08:22:41 AM

did fox report that it was a sea of people filling the mall? yup... was it? Nope...

again huggy "full" is a subjective term

did they report 10's of thousand? YUP

was there? YUP

guess which one is concrete and which one is up for interpretation?

I know youre smarter then this you just walked down a bad road and refuse to turn around but at the very least you can quit heading the wrong direction...

240 is Back · « **Reply #15 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:30:18 AM »

tony,

why do you think FOX allows their employee beck to keep spuouting numbers which we now know to be untrue?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #16 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:34:00 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 08:28:12 AM

"full" is a subjective term

no it's not. you can estimate a full mall. All estimations of a full mall are a million+ lies lies lies

The fox reporter pointed to the crowd in front of him and said the whole mall was the same. That's packed. That's as many people that were there for Obama. That's a huge lie.

tonymctones · « **Reply #17 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:35:15 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on September 19, 2009, 08:30:18 AM

tony,

why do you think FOX allows their employee beck to keep spuouting numbers which we now know to be untrue?

it attracts attention same as MSNBC and olbeirman

if you think different please answer why MSNBC allows olbeirman to do the things he does?

tonymctones · « **Reply #18 on:** September 19, 2009, 08:36:32 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 08:34:00 AM

no it's not. you can estimate a full mall. All estimations of a full mall are a million+ lies lies lies The fox reporter pointed to the crowd in front of him and said the whole mall was the same. That's packed. That's as many people that were there for Obama. That's a huge lie.

actually brain child it is

when you get a drink at a restaraunt they bring you a full glass but is it full to the point of overflowing? no so is it not full?

full a subjective term like a "big" crowd

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #19 on:** September 19, 2009, 09:18:20 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 08:36:32 AM

actually brain child it is

when you get a drink at a restaraunt they bring you a full glass but is it full to the point of overflowing? no so is it not full?

full a subjective term like a "big" crowd

LOL... did you actually just type this out or am I dreaming? Is she still a complete person after losing 30 lbs of fat from liposuction. It's subjective, 1/5th of her is out back in a barrel. 1/5th is now dead. If you loved her 100% before, do you only love her 90% now or 200% because she looks better. It's subjective, yea baby... (this went over tony's head

see the following post)

tonymctones · « **Reply #20 on:** September 19, 2009, 09:30:08 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 09:18:20 AM

LOL... did you actually just type this out or am I dreaming? Is she still a complete person after losing 30 lbs of fat from liposuction. It's subjective, 1/5th of her is out back in a barrel. 1/5th is now dead. If you loved her 100% before, do you only love her 90% now or 200% because she looks better. It's subjective, yea baby...

"love" is subjective too hugo

do you understand what subjective means? Im starting to think that you dont....

subjective means that each person internalizes it differently or its subject to each persons interpretation...

I was thinking you were just trying to make a point which while stupid as shit had the slightest bit of credibility but now Im not sure...

If youre trying to make a point hugo stick to beck he put it in concrete terms 1.7 million not subjective terms like "full" or "large" crowd.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #21 on:** September 19, 2009, 09:49:07 AM »

If I step on a bug and half of him runs off, did I kill the bug, it's subjective

Brilliant tony... yea, this is funny shit you got going but what the fox reporter said is not subjective. The reporter pointed to a group of people in front of him and said that it was the same all the way to the end of the mall. The group he pointed to was tightly packed. So he said the whole mall was the same as the tightly packed group he pointed at. There's nothing subective about that. At no time did the bulk of the mall ever come close to what he said. There's nothing subjective there, it's a lie! All pictures and video show wide open spaces in the mall.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #22 on:** September 19, 2009, 09:52:08 AM »

when you brush your hair and some comes out in the brush, do you still have a full head of hair, it's subjective

god I love that. funny stuff tony, I had a good laugh but hope you see your error here.

tonymctones · « **Reply #23 on:** September 19, 2009, 10:01:45 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 09:49:07 AM

If I step on a bug and half of him runs off, did I kill the bug, it's subjective Brilliant tony... yea, this is funny shit you got going but what the fox reporter said is not subjective. The reporter pointed to a group of people in front of him and said that it was the same all the way to the end of the mall. The group he pointed to was tightly packed. So he said the whole mall was the same as the tightly packed group he pointed at. There's nothing subective about that. At no time did the bulk of the mall ever come close to what he said. There's nothing subjective there, it's a lie! All pictures and video show wide open spaces in the mall.

are you fuking serious right now hugo?

what you said is he said it was "full" now what you just typed is a different story...which one is it?

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on September 19, 2009, 09:52:08 AM

when you brush your hair and some comes out in the brush, do you still have a full head of hair, it's subjective god I love that. funny stuff tony, I had a good laugh but hope you see your error here.

you seriously dont understand the term "subjective" do you?

really define it for me in your own words please

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #24 on:** September 19, 2009, 10:03:01 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on September 19, 2009, 10:01:45 AM

are you fuking serious right now hugo?

what you said is he said it was "full" now what you just typed is a different story...which one is it?
you seriously dont understand the term "subjective" do you?

really define it for me in your own words please

No, are you fucking serious?. sadly I think you are.