So don't blame Clinton for having Bin Laden in the palm of his hand more than 10 times and letting him go? Riiiiight!
As for Bush, they get threats everyday (same as Obama) which one do take more seriously than another? But after 9/11 they were all taken seriously and that precisly why we were kept safe for the last 7 1/2 years. Obama is trying to take us back to a pre 9/11 mentality that left us open in the first place. Sorry but diplomacy does't work as Obama has been proving!
Clinton was very soft on terror. So was Bush, until we got attacked.
I don't understand "Obama is soft on terror" when he's not only unleashed the Iraqi national forces to beat the shit out of the insurgents as CNN won't let us (and they are).
And Obama is doubling the number of troops in Afghanistan. You know, to actually catch bin Laden and kill the taleban who got very strong thru 2008, as you well know. They now run 80%+ of the country, and they only had 25% of the country in 2005. Obama ain't having that shit. He's beating the hell out of them now. We didn't have the forces there to do that from 05 to 08 because they were cleaning up Iraq.
And he's kept most of the nifty interrogation policies in place. our guys still do what they want.
So can you list the exact policies Obama has done to undo the Bush policies? We're "less safe" now, even though we have MORE troops fighting the bad guys? I'm confused dude.
