Why it's pointless to try to argue with ND and his fellow nuthuggers:
They can't read.
Example 1:
In all seriousness, why all the hate for Dorian? I am honestly curious as it seems unhealthy. I mean, you brought up Dorian as being "underrated" in a Cormier/Ronnie thread, a Levrone thread, and here in a thread about quads; none of which have anything to do with Dorian, and yet you continually bring him into just about every one of your posts. Seriously, why is Dorian on your mind 24/7 
Ronnie's quads in 04 are the best in terms of size. Munzer's in terms of definition & striations.
I bolded the important part. Hulkster did not bring up Dorian. Sculpture brought up Dorian which alerted ND's sixth sense and allowed him to swoop in in near record time to completely derail the thread.
Example 2:
Why must you start this shit again? Do you two have nothing better to do?
Again, Hulkster did not bring up Dorian. Nor was he the first to respond to a post mentioning Dorian.
Example 3:
Flex magazine chose Nasser El Sonbaty as having the best quads of all-time in the late 90's (i.e. after considering Dorian at his best, Platz, Demayo, etc.)
Read your statement again and get back with me...
"best quads of all-time in the late 90's "
I guess that wouldn't be all time would it? It would be of the late 90's...
FAIL
Yikes. Maybe Wiggs can understand this: "In the late 90's Flex magazine chose Nasser El Sonbaty as having the best quads of all-time (i.e. after considering Dorian at his best, Platz, Demayo, etc.)"
Do you get it now? Was it really that difficult for you to understand? How do you function in daily life?
Example 4:
Flex magazine chose Nasser El Sonbaty as having the best quads of all-time in the late 90's (i.e. after considering Dorian at his best, Platz, Demayo, etc.)
coughs ( bull shit ) 
Flex magazine July 2005 Wonder wheels: the 40 all-time greatest legs
I hope my bolds helped you out with that ND. When someone says quads, he means quads. When someone says legs, he means legs. And then you continue trying to flame bigbobs and the great Nasser when YOU are the one that can't read simple words? How nut-huggerish.
Example 5:
Are you saying you never saw the Flex mag where they took what they felt were the best bodyparts of any bodybuilder ever, and put them together into a super-bodybuilder? It had a cover shot - Nasser's quads were used. Some bodyparts were black and others white.
I think I have that mag and that means what compared to that list?
What does it mean compared to that list? Did you seriously ask that? It means NOTHING AT ALL. Do you know why? Because you copy and pasted a completely irrelevant list. All because you cannot read. Quads does not mean legs. Legs does not mean quads. Jesus Christ, you are like a retarded Forest Gump.
Example 6:
No Flex magazine is not credible when it doesn't favor Nasser and yes we've covered your hypocrisy before and you just tried to use Flex magazine as a ' credible source ' until it backfired in your face typical of you
Or maybe the list you posted is irrelevant to the discussion. Ever think of that? Or maybe you can't read for shit. Ever think of that? There was no backfire on bigbob's part. YOU are the one that it backfired on. YOU tried to counter someone's argument with some random irrelevant list.
Example 7:
LMFAO by a mile taken you seriously just ended 
and Nasser didn't even make the list and Tom was number 1 so much for a ' country mile ' and don't try and use they excuse Flex isn't credible not after you just tried to use them as a credible reference
Does it even have to be pointed out anymore? You post an irrelevant list and keep going back to the list to support your argument. The list has nothing to do with the thread, that is why nobody else cares about it. Didn't that ever occur to you?
Example 8:
My point is you're a hypocrite who hailed Flex and two seconds later dismissed it , Nasser does have good quads in fact good legs better than Platz you're either being contrary or stupid you pick
Again with the irrelevant list. Why shouldn't an irrelevant list be dismissed? Only in your mind does a random, irrelevant list pertain to the argument. And you calling somebody else stupid? When you can't read? HA!
Example 9:
are you new to the sport?
new to getbig?
dorian's quads were usually the WORST in the top 5.
even some nobody's quads were comparable at dorian's best LOL
yet he's on this list nothing wrong with Dorian's quads only stupid people think so , same contest opppsssssss looking dumb right about now
same guy jackass
Discussion about quads vs list about legs. How many times must it be said? Once is probably enough. It's just that pointing out how retarded you are (while you try to insult everyone else's intelligence to boot) is keeping me entertained for now. ND, have I convinced you to take up some remedial reading comprehension classes yet?
Example 10:
NO I'm not , you're the idiot who just hailed them for being right and then two seconds later claimed they sucked
and I agree Nasser has awesome quads , legs in fact but they best ever not even close
Hailed them for being right about Nasser having the best quads and claiming they suck for not having Nasser in the top 20 legs of all time are not mutually exclusive.
And what is that second line?! Is it possibly that ND does in fact know the difference between 'quads' and 'legs?' Then why would you have interchanged the two when it suited your argument? Hmmm. BUSTED! ND misusing/misrepresenting magazine articles to suite his argument? Who would have guessed?
Example 11:
I posted the legs article in response to BigBobs post. I highlighted Yates because he said Nasser was better than Yates , whom ironically they omitted
Again, bigbobs was talking about quads. You posted a list about legs. You fail at supporting your argument. Maybe you even knew what you were doing. Maybe you were hoping that nobody would notice. But if your argument is half as obvious as you claim why do you have to misrepresent articles, take things out of context, interchange uninterchangeable terms, etc. (lie, basically) to support your claim? Is it because you know you are wrong all along? Maybe you just like arguing on the internet acting as if you have a clue what you are talking about, hoping a couple other mental midgets will attach themselves to your ballbag along the way?
Example 12:
Who said I was hailing their top 20 list? because I posted it to refute your bullshit? to show how much a hypocrite you are for praising them one moment then basically saying it's useless?
Quads vs legs. And who is the one full of bullshit?
Well, that's only the first 5 pages of this thread, but I think everyone gets the point by now. Thank you and goodnight.
inbeforemeltdown
Btw, Platz had the best quads AND legs of all time.
/thread
