Author Topic: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse  (Read 5949 times)

Mons Venus

  • Guest




Building 7 had few fires and collapsed on its footprint. Building 5 burned COMPLETELY and no collapse. ::)

Discuss.....

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2009, 05:59:45 AM »




Building 7 had few fires and collapsed on its footprint. Building 5 burned COMPLETELY and no collapse. ::)




Discuss.....

240, have you seen this video? I'd like your input on this subject.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2009, 06:00:50 AM »

 ::)


Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2009, 06:38:08 AM »
Battalion & Company info mons?

Your business website please?



IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2009, 06:41:14 AM »
Another genius who is an expert of structural analysis via video  ::)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2009, 06:43:09 AM »
It is what it is, man.  Sad chapter in American history.  


And you guys are attacking the messenger, not the message. 

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2009, 06:55:26 AM »
It is what it is, man.  Sad chapter in American history.  


And you guys are attacking the messenger, not the message. 

Did you watch the vid I posted?  Completely refutes every single claim of the conspiracy nuts.  Purdue Univ also did one....it's somewhere on youtube.  Same result.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2009, 07:19:53 AM »
Did you watch the vid I posted?  Completely refutes every single claim of the conspiracy nuts.  Purdue Univ also did one....it's somewhere on youtube.  Same result.

Every single claim?   Uh, no.

And you can rest assured it was a govt grant that paid for it.

it is what it is.  The writers of the 911 commission report demanded a second investigation, admitted theirs was very incomplete.  And that was in 2005.  Lot of info has come out since then.

People are gonna believe what they're gonna believe.  Besides, we already know it was Aug 2001 that bush was given details and didn't act, so in light of all the day's events, we have that.  it is what it is, no point in over-analyzing it.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2009, 07:26:18 AM »
Every single claim?   Uh, no.

And you can rest assured it was a govt grant that paid for it.

it is what it is.  The writers of the 911 commission report demanded a second investigation, admitted theirs was very incomplete.  And that was in 2005.  Lot of info has come out since then.

People are gonna believe what they're gonna believe.  Besides, we already know it was Aug 2001 that bush was given details and didn't act, so in light of all the day's events, we have that.  it is what it is, no point in over-analyzing it.

You do realize that a president, along with many in the intel community, receivd hundreds/thousands of reports every month, right?  If someone brought you a report that pilots were going to attempt to crash planes into the WTC, just how much credibility would you have given it, pre 9/11?  Of course you will say, oh that would have been priority one....blah, blah, blah.....it's easy to look back and second guess.  You prioritize intel and then act where it's most appropriate.


and as for the conspiracy, I agree people will believe what they want.  I just tend to side with common sense and logic.

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2009, 09:41:39 AM »




Building 7 had few fires and collapsed on its footprint. Building 5 burned COMPLETELY and no collapse. ::)



Discuss.....

Some building fall on their footprint when  NOT on fire.......while others ON fire just burn.  ;)


Makes perfect sense.

kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4598
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2009, 09:44:20 AM »
Dude you're a retard if you think this was an inside job.  Get a fu*king life it's a disgrace to say such things.
Abandon every hope...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2009, 09:50:16 AM »
Dude you're a retard if you think this was an inside job.  Get a fu*king life it's a disgrace to say such things.

KC - the amount of people that would have to be involved in such a plot for it to be an "inside job" is so large that a "secret" of that magintude could never be kept or hidden in todays' age. 

When you really think of the amount of janitors, security guards, engineeers, etc who all would have to be involved in this, it simply holds no water.

   

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2009, 09:53:28 AM »
KC - the amount of people that would have to be involved in such a plot for it to be an "inside job" is so large that a "secret" of that magintude could never be kept or hidden in todays' age. 

When you really think of the amount of janitors, security guards, engineeers, etc who all would have to be involved in this, it simply holds no water.

   

It's funny. People will tell how Bush was retarded, a moron, unintelligent and yet they then turn around and try to imply that he concocted a plan of this magnitude AND has managed to keep it hidden all these years. Funny stuff.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2009, 10:00:25 AM »
try to imply that he concocted a plan of this magnitude AND has managed to keep it hidden all these years. Funny stuff.

I think many of the people who believe it was an inside job DO NOT credit Bush with anything but sititng back and watching things unfold that day.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2009, 10:02:04 AM »
It's funny. People will tell how Bush was retarded, a moron, unintelligent and yet they then turn around and try to imply that he concocted a plan of this magnitude AND has managed to keep it hidden all these years. Funny stuff.

Look, I tried actually considering how a plot of this nature would have to be executed and to me, its literally impossible when you consider how many people would have to be involved in this and still be silent and still be no evidence available.  

In order for this to hold water:

The security guards would have to have been in on this.
The janitors would have to been in on this.
The company with the security taspes would have to have been in on this.
A demolition company would have to be in on this.  
The president and VP in on this and whoever they used to relay the plans and messages.

In addition to the abovbe, we have to assume that no one leeked anything to wives, friends etc.  Additionally, we have to assume that no one ever had a crisis of conscience and backed out.  

We also have to assume that no one ever tried to write a book or make a film on this since they would have made millions or executed.  

We have to assume that this plot was thought of, hatched, planned, war gamed, and executed within 8 months.

These theories are patently absurd to anyone with the capacity to think behind their emotional hatred of Bush.  


kcballer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4598
  • In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2009, 10:09:51 AM »
KC - the amount of people that would have to be involved in such a plot for it to be an "inside job" is so large that a "secret" of that magintude could never be kept or hidden in todays' age. 

When you really think of the amount of janitors, security guards, engineeers, etc who all would have to be involved in this, it simply holds no water.

   

proof enough is that the people questioning it are alive.  If a govt was prepared to kill 1000's of it's own citizens in public why wouldn't it send special ops to kill anyone providing so called evidence of an inside job?
Abandon every hope...

Eyeball Chambers

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14344
  • Would you hold still? You're making me fuck up...
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2009, 10:12:50 AM »
Some building fall on their footprint when  NOT on fire.......while others ON fire just burn.  ;)


Makes perfect sense.

It's weird  :-\
S

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2009, 10:14:15 AM »
proof enough is that the people questioning it are alive.  If a govt was prepared to kill 1000's of it's own citizens in public why wouldn't it send special ops to kill anyone providing so called evidence of an inside job?

It just doesnt make sense from logistics point of view. 

big L dawg

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5729
  • i always tell the truth even when i lie...
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2009, 10:26:07 AM »
I wish someone would just explain how building seven fell.....
DAWG

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2009, 10:39:57 AM »




Building 7 had few fires and collapsed on its footprint. Building 5 burned COMPLETELY and no collapse. ::)

Discuss.....

Compare the above video to this:

 

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2009, 10:44:04 AM »
Compare the above video to this:

 



Now add this video:


IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2009, 10:44:41 AM »
I wish someone would just explain how building seven fell.....

I heard that there were lots of brotha's in the building and their boom boxes were blasting in the resonance frequency of the building it then reached structural failure....true story I heard if from Rev.Wright.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2009, 10:46:00 AM »
Hey MONS.,........Unit shitbag...Unit..where is it....nobody else cares what u have to say...unit
L

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22688
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2009, 10:47:28 AM »
ahh yes, master level science logic.....  both burned....  one collapsed and one didn't.

Must be Elivis and Tupac.

Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: WTC 5 Building Completely Destroyed By Fire But Did Not Collapse
« Reply #24 on: September 25, 2009, 11:00:12 AM »
I wish someone would just explain how building seven fell.....

WTC 7 OWNER Larry Silverstein explains what happened.