Author Topic: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.  (Read 3506 times)

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2009, 02:41:46 PM »
Jay looks 40lbs lighter, he'll be ripped to shreds, more vascular than his 2001 appearance and will barely make the top 5 because he is too small.....I hope he wins though.
looks bleak

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2009, 02:46:14 PM »
Jays wife look very attractive there
I would love to see a return to 2001 form for Jay

body88

  • Guest
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2009, 02:48:57 PM »
Jay looks 40lbs lighter, he'll be ripped to shreds, more vascular than his 2001 appearance and will barely make the top 5 because he is too small.....I hope he wins though.


So you can tell he's 40 lbs lighter in a triple xl shirt, thats black, in a picture taken from 10 feet away.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2009, 03:12:24 PM »
Jays wife look very attractive there
I would love to see a return to 2001 form for Jay
I think he will.
But he must be bigger than 2001 version to stand next to Kai.

lastrep

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 546
  • One Last Rep!
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2009, 03:17:49 PM »
You guys assume 2001 Jay is the hands-down winner? Think again.. many of the competitors will match and BEAT that condition tonight with MUCH better shape and muscle maturity.

Time has passed for Jay.. unless AMI / Flex decide they want to keep him

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #30 on: September 25, 2009, 03:20:58 PM »
I think he will.
But he must be bigger than 2001 version to stand next to Kai.
He looks small this year

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #31 on: September 25, 2009, 03:28:07 PM »
He looks small this year
Yeah. Thats one thing i dont like about him.
But hey, Bbing is all about ilusion. WHo knows..
Ronnie was big in his cloth even if he is in shape.

TruthHurts

  • Guest
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #32 on: September 25, 2009, 03:45:14 PM »
Jay looks 40lbs lighter, he'll be ripped to shreds, more vascular than his 2001 appearance and will barely make the top 5 because he is too small.....I hope he wins though.

 Funny that you pretend to hate bodybuilding yet this kind of thing "slips out"

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #33 on: September 25, 2009, 03:47:27 PM »
a great suit on nasser


He could do without shoulder pads in that suit of his.

Blockhead

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7793
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #34 on: September 25, 2009, 08:13:33 PM »
:o
Don't .... say... ANYTHING ...I repeat: ANYTHING... about the person that Bob is talking to!   :-X   :-X    :-X




 - Block!
?

Blockhead

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7793
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #35 on: September 25, 2009, 08:16:53 PM »
Jays wife look very attractive there
I would love to see a return to 2001 form for Jay
HAHAHAHA!  Have fun in prison, Okami!


 Not only do you get thrown into the abyss of Time Out but you will now face jail time and liquidation of assets.



 - Block!
?

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #36 on: September 25, 2009, 08:51:48 PM »

the jaw bones on these two are funny

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Bob Chick looks bigger than Cutler.
« Reply #37 on: September 25, 2009, 09:15:08 PM »