who's morality? well I think history can make a good case that a life of nacissism, hedonism, sloth and infidelity lead to a lot of unhappiness and destruction. I am not afraid to draw the line here. It is the morality of sane, disiplined, unselfish, faithful and productive people. Is that Jay and Branch?...I dont know, just posing the question. Are they ever immoral, yes they are human, it comes down to the classic scale of justice. Which side does the scale tip to?
narcissism= love of self, love of ego, etc....
hedonism= do what makes you happyest, all things considered...
sloth= to be free of concern, worry, stress
those three words all represent charcter traits whih are not necessarily negative traits, in fact they can be quite positive. because of the belief system that is pushed upon people, these words now carry with them a negative connotation, even though the actual traits the words describe arent negative things. in fact they can be admirable at times.
infidelity in of itself represents a negative action, a distrust of a bond. you canot use that in the way you did, its an unfair comparison. its like saying to lie is bad because lying is bad. or somehting along those lines.
sane, disciplined, and unselfish are all words which carry a positive vibe to them in todays culture. however, they could in fact represent negative actions, for example a disciplined person who doesnt think outside of their discipline (aka not having a mind of your own). etc.
morality is relative from planet to planet, continent to continent, country to coutnry, state to state, city to city, block to blcok, and person to person. for one person it may be moral to give a bum on the street the change from their pocket (giving to the needy), to another person it may be moral to tel the bum to get off the street quit begging and get a job (dsregarding fears of confrontation and giving constructive critism)... get it?
