Translation : The argument used to rationalize Dorian beating Ray.
No , no the argument that Dorian beat Ray because he was much bigger , harder , drier and better balanced oh and wider too and just plain better

which proves my point , the judges have criteria they must adhere to and if someone meets part of that criteria better than others he shouldn't be awarded the title
perfect example despite not being the most ' symmetrical ' Dorian never lost a symmetry round ever wonder why?
All rounds are physique rounds meaning symmetry is not judged as a separate and distinct entity , all rounds are physique rounds that means all the criteria is assessed in every round . muscular bulk , balance & proportion , density & dryness , etc
You can't give the overall title to a guy who is very hard and dry , yet lacks balance & muscular bulk , same with the muscularity round you can't give the title to the biggest guy if he's lacking in density & dryness , it's the guy who meets ALL of this criteria better than the others who is usually crowned the victor
Shawn Ray would have been multiple Mr Olympia if he was competing in 1981/1982/1983 the sport passed him by eons ago although he did very well for himself as did Lee Labrada